article

Odor source localization using a mobile robot in outdoor airflow environments with a particle filter algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper discusses odor source localization (OSL) using a mobile robot in an outdoor time-variant airflow environment. A novel OSL algorithm based on particle filters (PF) is proposed. When the odor plume clue is found, the robot performs an exploratory behavior, such as a plume-tracing strategy, to collect more information about the previously unknown odor source. In parallel, the information collected by the robot is exploited by the PF-based OSL algorithm to estimate the location of the odor source in real time. The process of the OSL is terminated if the estimated source locations converge within a given small area. The Bayesian-inference-based method is also performed for comparison. Experimental results indicate that the proposed PF-based OSL algorithm performs better than the Bayesian-inference-based OSL method.

References

  1. Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50, 174-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Consi, T. R., Atema, J., Goudey, C. A., Cho, J., & Chryssostomidis, C. (1994). AUV guidance with chemical signals. In Proceedings of 1994 symposium on autonomous underwater vehicle technology (pp. 450-455).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Farrell, J. A., Pang, S., & Li, W. (2005). Chemical plume tracing via an autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 30, 428-442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ferri, G., Caselli, E., Mattoli, V., Mondini, A., Mazzolai, B., & Dario, P. (2009). SPIRAL: a novel biologically-inspired algorithm for gas/odor source localization in an indoor environment with no strong airflow. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57, 393-402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Grasso, F. W., Consi, T. R., Mountain, D. C., & Atema, J. (2000). Biomimetic robot lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: progress and challenges. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 30(1), 115-131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hayes, A. T., Martinoli, A., & Goodman, R. M. (2003). Swarm robotic odor localization: off-line optimization and validation with real robots. Robotica, 21, 427-441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Holland, O., & Melhuish, C. (1996). Some adaptive movements of animats with single symmetrical sensors. In Proceedings of 4th conference on simulation and adaptive behavior--from animals to animats (Vol. 4, pp. 55-64).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ishida, H., Suetsugu, K., Nakamoto, T., & Moriizumi, T. (1994). Study of autonomous mobile sensing system for localization of odor source using gas sensors and anemometric sensors. Sensors and Actuators. A, Physical, 45, 153-157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishida, H., Nakamoto, T., & Moriizumi, T. (1998). Remote sensing of gas/odor source location and concentration distribution using mobile system. Sensors and Actuators. B, Chemical, 49, 52-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kahn, H. (1956). Use of different Monte Carlo sampling techniques. In H. A. Meyer (Ed.), Symposium onMonte Carlo methods (pp. 146- 190). New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kowadlo, G., & Russell, R. A. (2006). Using naïve physics for odor localization in a cluttered indoor environment. Autonomous Robots, 20(3), 215-230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kowadlo, G., & Russell, R. A. (2009). Improving the robustness of naïve physics airflow mapping using Bayesian reasoning on a multiple hypothesis tree. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57, 723-737. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Li, F., Meng, Q. H., Bai, S., Li, J. G., & Popescu, D. (2008). Probability-PSO algorithm for multi-robot based odor source localization in ventilated indoor environments. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 5314. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics (pp. 1206-1215). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, J. G., Meng, Q. H., Li, F., Zeng, M., & Popescu, D. (2009). Mobile robot based odor source localization via particle filter. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on decision and control (pp. 2984-2989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, W., Farrell, J. A., Pang, S., & Arrieta, R. M. (2006). Moth-inspired chemical plume tracing on an autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22, 292-307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lilienthal, A. J., & Duckett, T. (2004). Building gas concentration gridmaps with a mobile robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 48, 3-16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lilienthal, A. J., Loutfi, A., & Duckett, T. (2006). Airborne chemical sensing with mobile robots. Sensors, 6, 1616-1678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marques, L., Nunes, U., & de Almeida, A. T. (2006). Particle swarm-based olfactory guided search. Autonomous Robots, 20(3), 277- 287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pang, S., & Farrell, J. A. (2006). Chemical plume source localization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B. Cybernetics, 36, 1068-1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Russell, R. A., Thiel, D., & Mackay-Sim, A. (1994). Sensing odour trails for mobile robot navigation. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2672- 2677).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell, R. A., Thiel, D., Deveza, R., & Mackay-Sim, A. (1995). A robotic system to locate hazardous chemical leaks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 556-561).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Russell, R. A., Bab-Hadiashar, A., Shepherd, R. L., & Wallace, G. G. (2003). A comparison of reactive chemotaxis algorithms. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 45(2), 83-97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sandini, G., Lucarini, G., & Varoli, M. (1993). Gradient-driven self-organizing systems. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots systems (pp. 429-432).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vergassola, M., Villermaux, E., & Shraiman, B. I. (2007). 'Infotaxis' as a strategy for searching without gradients. Nature, 445, 406-409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Zarzhitsky, D., Spears, D. F., & Spears, W. M. (2005). Distributed robotics approach to chemical plume tracing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (pp. 4034-4039).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!