ACM Digital Library home
ACM home
Advanced Search
research-article

Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends

Computers in Human BehaviorVolume 75Issue COctober 2017 pp 749–756https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018
Online:01 October 2017Publication History
  • 4citation
  • 0
  • Downloads
Metrics
Total Citations4
Total Downloads0
Last 12 Months0
Last 6 weeks0

Abstract

Our understanding of the prevalence, correlates, predictors, and outcomes of sexting is increasing; however, little is known about potential positive aspects of this emerging behavior, and whether the consequences of sexting vary by gender or relationship type (committed vs. casual). Using a sample of 352 undergraduate students (106 men, 246 women) the present study addresses this gap in the literature. Sixty-two percent of the participants reported that they had sent or received a sexually-explicit picture message. Of these, 56% reported that the sexting occurred with a committed partner, and 44% reported that it was with a casual partner. Men were significantly more likely to report sexting with a casual partner, while women were more likely to report sexting with a committed partner. Approximately half of young adults identified positive or neutral outcomes related to sexting; however, there were differences by relationship type and gender. For the most part, women and those who sexted with a casual partner identified fewer positive and more negative consequences than did men and those who sexted with a committed partner. Overall, findings point to the importance of considering individual and relationship characteristics in identifying and responding to teen and young adult sexting. Men more likely to have sent last sext to casual than committed sex partner.Women more likely to have sent last sext to committed than casual sex partner.About half reported positive sexual or emotional sexting consequences.One tenth reported negative sexual or emotional sexting consequences.Sexts sent in casual relationships have more negative and fewer positive outcomes.

References

  1. bib1 J.R. Agustina, Analyzing sexting from a criminological perspective. beyond child pornography issues: Sexting as a threshold for victimization, in: Cybercrime & security, west, thomson reuters, section 4, Vol. 4, 2012, pp. 64-96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. bib2 J.R. Agustina, E.L. Gmez-Durn, Sexting: Research criteria of a globalized social phenomenon, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41 (2012) 1325-1328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. bib3 Associated Press (AP) & MTV, AP-MTV Digital abuse study, executive summary, 2009, September 23. http://www.athinline.org/MTV-AP_Digital_Abuse_Study_Executive_Summary.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. bib4 E.G. Benotsch, D.J. Snipes, A.M. Martin, S.S. Bull, Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults, Journal of Adolescent Health, 52 (2013) 307-313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. bib5 M. Burkett, Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults' negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting, Sexuality & Culture, 19 (2015) 835-863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. bib6 K. Cooper, E. Quayle, L. Jonsson, C.G. Svedin, Adolescents and self-taken sexual images: A review of the literature, Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (2016) 706-716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. bib7 D.M. Crimmins, K.C. Siegfried-Spellar, Peer attachment, sexual experiences, and risky online behaviors as predictors of sexting behaviors among undergraduate students, Computers in Human Behavior, 32 (2014) 268-275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. bib10 M.J. Davis, A. Powell, D. Gordon, T. Kershaw, Iwant your sext: Sexting and sexual risk in emerging adult minority men, AIDS Education & Prevention, 28 (2016) 138-152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. bib11 R. Delevi, R.S. Weisskirch, Personality factors as predictors of sexting, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 2589-2594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. bib12 A.L. Dir, A. Coskunpinar, J.L. Steiner, M.A. Cyders, Understanding differences in sexting behaviors across gender, relationship status, and sexual identity, and the role of expectancies in sexting, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16 (2013) 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. bib13 A.L. Dir, M.A. Cyders, Risks, risk factors, and outcomes associated with phone and Internet sexting among university students in the United States, Archives Of Sexual Behavior, 44 (2015) 1675-1684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. bib14 A.L. Dir, M.A. Cyders, A. Coskunpinar, From the bar to the bed via mobile phone: A first test of the role of problematic alcohol use, sexting, and impulsivity-related traits in sexual hookups, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 1664-1670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. bib15 A.L. Dir, C. Koo, M.A. Cyders, Sexting: A new and emerging behavior of risk, in: Psychology of risk-taking, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, US, 2013, pp. 151-185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. bib16 N. Dring, Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting?, Cyberpsychology, 8 (2014) 1-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. bib17 M. Drouin, Sexual communication in the digital age, in: The Wiley handbook of psychology, technology and society, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, pp. 176-191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. bib18 M. Drouin, C. Landgraff, Texting, sexting, attachment, and intimacy in college students' romantic relationships, Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2012) 444-449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. bib19 M. Drouin, J. Ross, E. Tobin, Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression?, Computers in Human Behavior, 50 (2015) 197-204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. bib20 M. Drouin, E. Tobin, Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations, Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014) 412-418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. bib21 M. Drouin, K.N. Vogel, A. Surbey, J.R. Stills, Let's talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) A25-A30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. bib22 E. Englander, Low risk associated with most teenage sexting: A study of 617 18-year-olds, Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Center, 2012. http://webhost.bridgew.edu/marc/SEXTING%20AND%20COERCION%20report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. bib23 C.J. Ferguson, Sexting behaviors among young Hispanic women: Incidence and association with other high-risk sexual behaviors, Psychiatric Quarterly, 82 (2011) 239-243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. bib24 M. Fleschler Peskin, C.M. Markham, R.C. Addy, R. Shegog, M. Thiel, S.R. Tortolero, Prevalence and patterns of sexting among ethnic minority urban high school students, Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 16 (2013) 454-459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. bib25 J.R. Garcia, A.N. Gesselman, S.A. Siliman, B.L. Perry, K. Coe, H.E. Fisher, Sexting among singles in the USA: Prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images, Sexual Health (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. bib26 A.M. Garrison, J.H. Kahn, S.A. Miller, E.M. Sauer, Emotional avoidance and rumination as mediators of the relation between adult attachment and emotional disclosure, Personality and Individual Differences, 70 (2014) 239-245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. bib27 D. Gordon-Messer, J. Bauermeister, A. Grodzinski, M. Zimmerman, Sexting among young adults, Journal of Adolescent Health, 52 (2012) 301-306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. bib28 L. Henderson, E. Morgan, Sexting and sexual relationships among teens and young adults, McNair Scholars Research Journal, 7 (2011) 31-39. http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/mcnair_journal/vol7/iss1/9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. bib29 E.A. Impett, A. Muise, D. Peragine, Sexuality in the context of relationships, in: APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 1: Person-based approaches, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2014, pp. 269-315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. bib30 J.A. Jewell, C.S. Brown, Sexting, catcalls, and butt slaps: How gender stereotypes and perceived group norms predict sexualized behavior, Sex Roles, 69 (2013) 594-604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. bib31 B. Klettke, D.J. Hallford, D.J. Mellor, Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review, Clinical Psychology Review, 34 (2014) 44-53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. bib32 M.A. Lewis, H. Granato, J.A. Blayney, T.W. Lostutter, J.R. Kilmer, Predictors of hooking up sexual behavior and emotional reactions among U.S. college students, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41 (2012) 1219-1229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. bib33 J.R. Lippman, S.W. Campbell, Damned if you do, damned if you don'tif you're a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States, Journal of Children and Media, 8 (2014) 371-386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. bib34 K.P. Mark, J.R. Garcia, H.E. Fisher, Perceived emotional and sexual satisfaction across sexual relationship contexts: Gender and sexual orientation differences and similarities, Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24 (2015) 120-130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. bib35 B.T. McDaniel, M. Drouin, Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18 (2015) 628-634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. bib36 M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (2003) 53-152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. bib37 M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. bib38 J.N. Morey, A.L. Gentzler, B. Creasy, A.M. Oberhauser, D. Westerman, Young adults' use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 1771-1778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. bib39 S.M. Ogletree, J. Fancher, S. Gill, Gender and texting: Masculinity, femininity, and gender role ideology, Computers in Human Behavior, 37 (2014) 49-55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. bib56 J. Owen, F.D. Finchman, Young adults' emotional reactions after hooking up encounters, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40 (2011) 321-330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. bib40 J.J. Owen, G.K. Rhoades, S.M. Stanley, F.D. Fincham, Hooking upamong college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39 (2010) 653-663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. bib41 T.S. Parker, K.M. Blackburn, M.S. Perry, J.M. Hawks, Sexting as an intervention: Relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations, American Journal of Family Therapy, 41 (2013) 1-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. bib42 A.B. Perkins, J.V. Becker, M. Tehee, E. Mackelprang, Sexting behaviors among college students: Cause for concern?, International Journal of Sexual Health, 26 (2014) 79-92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. bib43 J. Ringrose, R. Gill, S. Livingstone, L. Harvey, Aqualitative study of children, young people and sexting: A report prepared for the NSPCC, National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, London, 2012. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/44216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. bib44 J. Ringrose, L. Harvey, R. Gill, S. Livingstone, Teen girls, sexual double standards and sexting: Gendered value in digital image exchange, Feminist Theory, 14 (2013) 305-323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. bib45 P. Samimi, K.G. Alderson, Sexting among undergraduate students, Computers in Human Behavior, 31 (2014) 230-241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. bib46 E.C. Stasko, P.A. Geller, Reframing sexting as a positive relationship behavior, in: Paper presented at American Psychological Association 2015 Convention, August 69, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015. www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2015/08/reframing-sexting.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. bib48 J.R. Temple, J.A. Paul, P. van den Berg, V.D. Le, A. McElhany, B.W. Temple, Teen sexting and its associations with sexual behaviours, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 166 (2012) 828-833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. bib49 J. Van Ouytsel, M. Walrave, E. Van Gool, Sexting: Between thrill and fearhow schools can respond, Clearing House, 87 (2014) 204-212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. bib50 S. Walker, L. Sanci, M. Temple-Smith, Sexting: Young women's and men's views on its nature and origins, Journal of Adolescent Health, 52 (2013) 697-701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. bib57 M. Wei, D.W. Russell, B. Mallinckrodt, D.L. Vogel, The experiences in close relationships scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure, Journal of Personality Assessment, 88 (2007) 187-204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. bib51 R.S. Weisskirch, R. Delevi, Sexting and adult romantic attachment, Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (2011) 1697-1701. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. bib52 R.S. Weisskirch, M. Drouin, R. Delevi, Relational anxiety and sexting, Journal of Sex Research (2016) 1-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. bib53 B.K. Wiederhold, Should adult sexting be considered for the DSM?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, &Social Networking, 14 (2011) 481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. bib54 B.K. Wiederhold, Does sexting improve adult sexual relationships?, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 18 (2015) 627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. bib55 D. Wysocki, C. Childers, Let my fingers do the talking: Sexting and infidelity in cyberspace, Sexuality and Culture, 15 (2011) 217-239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

Get this Article
View Issue’s Table of Contents
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!