skip to main content
research-article

An Improved Vertex Caching Scheme for 3D Mesh Rendering

Published:01 July 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Modern graphics cards are equipped with a vertex cache to reduce the amount of data needing to be transmitted to the graphics pipeline during rendering. To make effective use of the cache and facilitate rendering, it is key to represent a mesh in a manner that maximizes the cache hit rate. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective algorithm for generating a sequence for efficient rendering of 3D polygonal meshes based on greedy optimization. The algorithm outperforms the current state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of rendering efficiency of the resultant sequence. We also adapt it for the rendering of progressive meshes. For any simplified version of the original mesh, the rendering sequence is generated by adaptively updating the reordered sequence at full resolution. The resultant rendering sequence is cheap to compute and has reasonably good rendering performance, which is desirable to many complex rendering environments involving continuous rendering of meshes at various level of details. The experimental results on a collection of 3D meshes are provided.

References

  1. Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 13-16, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Deering, “Geometry Compression,” Proc. 22nd Ann. Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M.M. Chow, “Optimized Geometry Compression for Real-Time Rendering,” Proc. Eighth Conf. Visualization, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Neider et al., OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, release 1. Addison-Wesley, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Discrete Applied Math., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 207-217, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Estkowski, J.S. B. Mitchell, and X. Xiang, “Optimal Decomposition of Polygonal Models into Triangle Strips,” Proc. 18th Ann. Symp. Computational Geometry, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. Evans, S. Skiena, and A. Varshney, “Optimizing Triangle Strips for Fast Rendering,” Proc. Seventh Conf. Visualization, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Hoppe, “Optimization of Mesh Locality for Transparent Vertex Caching,” Proc. 26th Ann. Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. X. Xiang, M. Held, and J. Mitchell, “Fast and Effective Stripification of Polygon Surface Models,” Proc. Symp. Interative 3D Graphics, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Diaz-Gutierrez et al., “Constrained Strip Generation and Management for Efficient Interactive 3D Rendering,” Proc. Computer Graphics Int'l Conf. (CGI), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137-148, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 306-316, May-June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Z. Karni, A. Bogomjakov, and C. Gotsman, “Efficient Compression and Rendering of Multi-Resolution Meshes,” Proc. Conf. Visualization, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Lin and T.P. Yu, “Greedy Algorithms for Rendering Sequence Generation of Triangle Meshes for Controllable and FIFO Cache Models,” manuscript, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Cuthill and J. McKee, “Reducing the Bandwidth of Sparse Symmetric Matrices,” Proc. 1969 24th Nat'l ACM Conf., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Alliez and M. Desbrun, “Valence-Driven Connectivity Encoding for 3D Meshes,” Proc. Eurographics Conf., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Sloan, “An Algorithm for Profile and Wavefront Reduction of Sparse Matrices,” Int'l J. Numerical Methods Eng., vol. 23, pp. 1315-1324, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. W.J. Schroeder, J.A. Zarge, and W.E. Lorensen, “Decimation of Triangle Meshes,” Proc. 19th Ann. Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Hoppe, “Progressive Meshes,” Proc. 23rd Ann. Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M.-E. Algorri and F. Schmitt, “Mesh Simplification,” Proc. Eurographics Conf., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Ronfard, J. Rossignac, and J. Rossignac, “Full-Range Approximation of Triangulated Polyhedra,” Proc. Eurographics Conf., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 64-77, May 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Gibbs, W.J. Poole, and P. Stockmeyer, “An Algorithm for Reducing the Bandwidth and Profile of a Sparse Matrix,” SIAM J. Numerical Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 235-251, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Josep Díaz , Jordi Petit , Maria Serna, A survey of graph layout problems, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.34 n.3, p.313-356, September 2002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Improved Vertex Caching Scheme for 3D Mesh Rendering

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!