Douglas W. Jones
Abstract
Exploiting the redundancy in election records to conduct useful audits and improve the system design process.
References
- Adler, J. Confidence: What it is and how to achieve it. NIST Symposium on Building Trust and Confidence in Voting Systems. December 2003, Gaithersburg, MD; www.votehere.net/papers/NIST_121003.pdf.Google Scholar
- Arizona Revised Statutes, 2003. Title 16, Chapter 5, Article 12, Section 16-664---Recount of votes by automatic tabulating system; www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp.Google Scholar
- California Elections Code, 2003. Chapter 4---Official canvass, Section 15302---General provisions; www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.Google Scholar
- California Elections Code, 2003. Chapter 4---Official canvass, Section 15360---One percent manual tally; www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.Google Scholar
- Colorado Revised Statutes, 2003. Title 1, Article 10.5, Section 108---Method of recount; www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/geninfo.htm.Google Scholar
- Federal Election Commission. 2002 Voting System Standards, Volume I. Section 2.2.5, System audit; fecweb1.fec.gov/pages/vss/vss.html.Google Scholar
- Federal Election Commission. 2002 Voting System Standards, Volume II. Section 5.2, Basis of software testing; fecweb1.fec.gov/pages/vss/vss.html.Google Scholar
- Hargrove, T. Voter totals often not known. Cincinatti Post. (Dec. 12, 2000); www.cincypost.com/news/2000/undsid120500.html.Google Scholar
- Iowa Code, 2003 Supplement. Section 39A.3, Election misconduct in the second degree; www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/2003SUPPLEMENT/39A/3.html.Google Scholar
- Procedures at a General Election. Department for Constitutional Affairs, London, August 2001; www.dca.gov.uk/elections/ge2001/procedures/.Google Scholar
- Schoenmakers, B. Fully auditable electronic secret-ballot elections. Xootic. July 2000; www.win.tue.nl/xootic/magazine/jul-2000/schoenmakers.pdf.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Auditing elections
Comments