skip to main content
article

Policing congestion response in an internetwork using re-feedback

Published: 22 August 2005 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    This paper introduces a novel feedback arrangement, termed re-feedback. It ensures metrics in data headers such as time to live and congestion notification will arrive at each relay carrying a truthful prediction of the remainder of their path. We propose mechanisms at the network edge that ensure the dominant selfish strategy of both network domains and end-points will be to set these headers honestly and to respond correctly to path congestion and delay, despite conflicting interests. Although these mechanisms influence incentives, they don't involve tampering with end-user pricing. We describe a TCP rate policer as a specific example of this new capability. We show it can be generalised to police various qualities of service. We also sketch how a limited form of re-feedback could be deployed incrementally around unmodified routers without changing IP.

    References

    [1]
    R. Braden, D. Clark, S. Shenker, and J. Wroclawski. Developing a next-generation Internet architecture. White paper, DARPA, July 2000.
    [2]
    B. Briscoe and S. Rudkin. Commercial models for IP quality of service interconnect. BTTJ, 23(2), Apr. 2005.
    [3]
    k. claffy. The nature of the beast: Recent traffic measurements from an Internet backbone. In Proc. INET'98. ISOC, 1998.
    [4]
    D. Clark, K. Sollins, J. Wroclawski, and R. Braden. Tussle in cyberspace: Defining tomorrow's Internet. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'02, CCR, 32(4), Aug. 2002.
    [5]
    D. D. Clark. Combining sender and receiver payments in the Internet. In G. Rosston and D. Waterman, editors, Interconnection and the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, Oct. 1996.
    [6]
    J. Crowcroft and P. Oechslin. Differentiated end to end Internet services using a weighted proportional fair sharing TCP. CCR, 28(3):53--69, July 1998.
    [7]
    S. Floyd and K. Fall. Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(4):458--472, Aug. 1999.
    [8]
    S. Floyd and V. Jacobson. Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 1(4):397--413, Aug. 1993.
    [9]
    A. Ganesh, P. Key, and L. Massoulié. Feedback and bandwidth sharing in networks. In Proc. 39th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, 2001.
    [10]
    D. K. Goldenberg, L. Qiu, H. Xie, Y. R. Yang, and Y. Zhang. Optimizing cost and performance for multihoming. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'04, CCR, 34(4):79--92, Oct. 2004.
    [11]
    A. Jain, S. Floyd, M. Allman, and P. Sarolahti. Quick-Start for TCP and IP. Internet Draft draft-ietf-tsvwg-quickstart, IETF, May 2005. (Work in progress).
    [12]
    D. Katabi, M. Handley, and C. Rohrs. Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'02, CCR, 32(4):89--102, Oct. 2002.
    [13]
    F. P. Kelly. Models for a self-managed Internet. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A358 (2000):2335--2348, 1999.
    [14]
    F. P. Kelly, A. K. Maulloo, and D. K. H. Tan. Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(3):237--252, 1998.
    [15]
    A. Odlyzko. A modest proposal for preventing Internet congestion. Technical report TR 97.35.1, AT&T Research, Florham Park, New Jersey, Sept. 1997.
    [16]
    T. J. Ott, T. V. Lakshman, and L. H. Wong. SRED: Stabilized RED. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Comm's (Infocom'99), pages 1346--1355, Mar. 1999.
    [17]
    J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP throughput: A simple model and its empirical validation. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM'98, CCR, 28(4), 1998.
    [18]
    R. Pan, L. Breslau, B. Prabhaker, and S. Shenker. Approximate fairness through differential dropping. CCR, 33(2):23--40, Apr. 2003.
    [19]
    K. K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, and D. Black. The addition of explicit congestion notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 3168, IETF, Sept. 2001.
    [20]
    V. A. Siris. Resource control for elastic traffic in CDMA networks. In Proc. ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networks (MobiCom'02), Sept. 2002.
    [21]
    N. Spring, D. Wetherall, and D. Ely. Robust explicit congestion notification (ECN) signaling with nonces. RFC RFC3540, IETF, June 2003.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enforcing Fairness in the Traffic Policer Among Heterogeneous Congestion Control AlgorithmsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.327641032:1(34-49)Online publication date: Feb-2024
    • (2017)Alternative backoff: Achieving low latency and high throughput with ECN and AQM2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2017.8264863(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2017
    • (2017)A survey of distributed denial-of-service attack, prevention, and mitigation techniquesInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10.1177/155014771774146313:12(155014771774146)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Policing congestion response in an internetwork using re-feedback

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
      ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 35, Issue 4
      Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
      October 2005
      324 pages
      ISSN:0146-4833
      DOI:10.1145/1090191
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      • cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '05: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
        August 2005
        350 pages
        ISBN:1595930094
        DOI:10.1145/1080091
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 August 2005
      Published in SIGCOMM-CCR Volume 35, Issue 4

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. QoS
      2. characterisation
      3. congestion
      4. incentives
      5. policing

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)495
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Enforcing Fairness in the Traffic Policer Among Heterogeneous Congestion Control AlgorithmsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.327641032:1(34-49)Online publication date: Feb-2024
      • (2017)Alternative backoff: Achieving low latency and high throughput with ECN and AQM2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2017.8264863(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2017
      • (2017)A survey of distributed denial-of-service attack, prevention, and mitigation techniquesInternational Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks10.1177/155014771774146313:12(155014771774146)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2017
      • (2016)Activity-based congestion management for fair bandwidth sharing in trusted packet networksNOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502817(231-239)Online publication date: Apr-2016
      • (2016)Reducing Internet Latency: A Survey of Techniques and Their MeritsIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2014.237521318:3(2149-2196)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
      • (2015)Oh flow, are thou happy? Tcp sendbuffer advertising for make benefit of clouds and tenantsProceedings of the 7th USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing10.5555/2827719.2827720(1-1)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2015
      • (2015)Exploiting the Power of Multiplicity: A Holistic Survey of Network-Layer MultipathIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2015.245394117:4(2176-2213)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2015
      • (2014)Economic incentives for adopting congestion accountability protocols2014 26th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC)10.1109/ITC.2014.6932931(1-9)Online publication date: Sep-2014
      • (2013)FCPACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/2534169.248600443:4(135-146)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2013
      • (2013)Service Boost: Towards on-demand QoS enhancements for OTT apps in LTE2013 21st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)10.1109/ICNP.2013.6733663(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2013
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media