article

The geometry of musical structure: a brief introduction and history

Online:01 October 2005Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a general introduction to the idea that musical structure can be represented geometrically. It begins by defining those elements that appear in the models in the three papers that follow. A brief review is given of psychological results demonstrating that these music-theoretic definitions describe implicit knowledge that listeners have of tonal-harmonic music. This is followed by a brief historical summary of maps that were proposed previously of keys, tones, and chords, and a hybrid tone-chord map. The article then summarizes a number of issues that arise in connection with geometric representations. Finally, the innovations in the three proposed models are highlighted, particularly their contributions to visualizing the dynamics and temporal relationships that exist in extended musical pieces.

References

  1. Chew, E. 2000. Towards a Mathematical Model of Tonality. Ph.D. dissertation, Operations Research Center, MIT. Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuddy, L. L. and Thompson, W. F. 1992. Asymmetries of perceived key movement in chorale sequences: converging evidence from a probe-tone analysis. Psychological Research 54 (1992), 51-59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gollin, E. 1998. Some aspects of three-dimensional Tonnetze. J. Music Theory 42 (1998), 195-206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Heinichen, J. D. 1969. Der Generalbass in der Komposition. Hildesheim, New York; G. Olms (originally published in 1728).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Helmholtz, H. L. F. 1954. On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. A. J. Ellis, ed. and translator. Dover, New York. (Revised edition originally published in 1885).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyer, B. 2001. Tonality. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. S. Sadie, ed. Macmillan, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Journal of Music Theory. Special Issue on Neo-Riemannian Theory 42, 2 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Krumhansl, C. L. 1979. The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology 11 (1979), 346-374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Krumhansl, C. L. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Krumhansl, C. L. 2004. The cognition of tonality --- as we know it today. J. New Music Research 33 (2004), 253-268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J. J., and Castellano, M. A. 1982a. Key distance effects on perceived harmonic structure in music. Perception & Psychophysics 32 (1982), 96-108. {author: please check against text to see if ref to 1982a is correct}Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J. J. and Kessler, E. J. 1982b. Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982), 24-36. {author: please check against text to see if ref to 1982b is correct}Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Krumhansl, C. L. and Kessler, E. J. 1982. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review 89 (1982), 334-368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Krumhansl, C. L. and Toiviainen, P. 2001. Tonal cognition. In The Biological Foundations of Music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930 (2001), 77-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lerdahl, F. 2001. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1983. Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Longuet-higgins, H. C. and Steedman, M. J. 1971. On interpreting Bach. Machine Intelligence 6 (1971), 221-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mattheson, J. 1980. Kleine General-Bass-Schule. Laaber-Verlag (Originally published in 1735).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasch, R. 1983. Three Musical Circles for Keyboard. The Diapason Press, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schoenberg, A. 1969. Structural Functions of Harmony. (Rev. ed.). Norton, New York (Originally published in 1954).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Shepard, R. N. 1982. Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review 89 (1982), 305-333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Thompson, W. F. and Cuddy, L. L. 1989. Sensitivity to key change in chorale sequences: A comparison of single voices and four-voice harmony. Music Perception 7 (1989), 151-168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Toiviainen, P. and Krumhansl, C. L. 2003. Measuring and modeling real-time responses to music: Tonality induction. Perception 32 (2003), 741-766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The geometry of musical structure: a brief introduction and history

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!