Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a general introduction to the idea that musical structure can be represented geometrically. It begins by defining those elements that appear in the models in the three papers that follow. A brief review is given of psychological results demonstrating that these music-theoretic definitions describe implicit knowledge that listeners have of tonal-harmonic music. This is followed by a brief historical summary of maps that were proposed previously of keys, tones, and chords, and a hybrid tone-chord map. The article then summarizes a number of issues that arise in connection with geometric representations. Finally, the innovations in the three proposed models are highlighted, particularly their contributions to visualizing the dynamics and temporal relationships that exist in extended musical pieces.
References
- Chew, E. 2000. Towards a Mathematical Model of Tonality. Ph.D. dissertation, Operations Research Center, MIT. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Cuddy, L. L. and Thompson, W. F. 1992. Asymmetries of perceived key movement in chorale sequences: converging evidence from a probe-tone analysis. Psychological Research 54 (1992), 51-59.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Gollin, E. 1998. Some aspects of three-dimensional Tonnetze. J. Music Theory 42 (1998), 195-206.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Heinichen, J. D. 1969. Der Generalbass in der Komposition. Hildesheim, New York; G. Olms (originally published in 1728).Google Scholar
- Helmholtz, H. L. F. 1954. On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. A. J. Ellis, ed. and translator. Dover, New York. (Revised edition originally published in 1885).Google Scholar
- Hyer, B. 2001. Tonality. In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. S. Sadie, ed. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
- Journal of Music Theory. Special Issue on Neo-Riemannian Theory 42, 2 (1998).Google Scholar
- Krumhansl, C. L. 1979. The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology 11 (1979), 346-374.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Krumhansl, C. L. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Krumhansl, C. L. 2004. The cognition of tonality --- as we know it today. J. New Music Research 33 (2004), 253-268.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J. J., and Castellano, M. A. 1982a. Key distance effects on perceived harmonic structure in music. Perception & Psychophysics 32 (1982), 96-108. {author: please check against text to see if ref to 1982a is correct}Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J. J. and Kessler, E. J. 1982b. Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 (1982), 24-36. {author: please check against text to see if ref to 1982b is correct}Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Krumhansl, C. L. and Kessler, E. J. 1982. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review 89 (1982), 334-368.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Krumhansl, C. L. and Toiviainen, P. 2001. Tonal cognition. In The Biological Foundations of Music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930 (2001), 77-91.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lerdahl, F. 2001. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1983. Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Longuet-higgins, H. C. and Steedman, M. J. 1971. On interpreting Bach. Machine Intelligence 6 (1971), 221-241.Google Scholar
- Mattheson, J. 1980. Kleine General-Bass-Schule. Laaber-Verlag (Originally published in 1735).Google Scholar
- Rasch, R. 1983. Three Musical Circles for Keyboard. The Diapason Press, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Schoenberg, A. 1969. Structural Functions of Harmony. (Rev. ed.). Norton, New York (Originally published in 1954).Google Scholar
- Shepard, R. N. 1982. Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review 89 (1982), 305-333.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Thompson, W. F. and Cuddy, L. L. 1989. Sensitivity to key change in chorale sequences: A comparison of single voices and four-voice harmony. Music Perception 7 (1989), 151-168.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Toiviainen, P. and Krumhansl, C. L. 2003. Measuring and modeling real-time responses to music: Tonality induction. Perception 32 (2003), 741-766.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
Index Terms
The geometry of musical structure: a brief introduction and history





Comments