David Sloan
Andy Heath
Brian Kelly
ABSTRACT
We argue that while work to optimize the accessibility of the World Wide Web through the publication and dissemination of a range of guidelines is of great importance, there is also the need for a more holistic approach to maximizing the role of the Web in enabling disabled people to access information, services and experiences. The persistently disappointingly low levels of usability of Web content for disabled people indicates that focusing on the adoption of accessibility guidelines by content authors, tool developers and policy makers is not sufficient for a truly inclusive Web. This approach fails to acknowledge the role of the Web as an enabler in a broader context and may stifle creative use of Web content and experiences to enhance social inclusion.Using e-learning as an example, and describing current metadata developments, we present a framework that will guide Web authors and policy makers in addressing accessibility at a higher level, by defining the context in which a Web resource will be used and considering how best existing or new alternatives may be combined to enhance the accessibility of the information and services provided by the site in question. We demonstrate how guidelines such as those produced by the W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative have a role to play within this wider context, along with metadata and user profiling initiatives.
References
- Alexander D. (2004) What is the relationship between usability and accessibility, and what should it be? Presented at OZeWAI 2005 Conference. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://deyalexander.com/presentations/usability-accessibility/Google Scholar
- Beyer H. and Holtzblatt K. (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centred systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brajnik G. (2005) Engineering accessibility through corporate policies. Congresso Annuale AICA 2005, Comunità Virtuale dalla Ricerca all'Impresa, dalla Formazione al Cittadino, Udine, Italy, Oct. 2005. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio/publications.html#aica05Google Scholar
- Brajnik G. (2005) Accessibility assessments through heuristic walkthroughs. In: Proceedings of HCItaly 2005, Simposio su Human-Computer Interaction. Rome, Italy, Sept. 2005. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio/publications.html#hcihw05Google Scholar
- British Standards Institute (2006) Publicly Accessible Specification: Guide to good practice in commissioning accessible web sites (PAS 78). London: British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
- CEN-ISSS (Comite Europeen de Normalisation) Learning Technologies Workshop. CEN Workshop Agreements (standards) are available for download from a link on this site: Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.cenorm.be/isss/Workshop/It/Google Scholar
- Chisholm W. and Henry S. (2005) Interdependent components of Web accessibility. Proceedings of W4A at WWW2005: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark J. (2002) Building Accessible Web Sites. Indianapolis: New Riders. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark J. (2005) Big Stark & Chunky. A List Apart 191. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/lowvision/Google Scholar
- Colwell C. and Petrie H. (1999). A preliminary evaluation of the WAI guidelines for producing accessible web pages. In C. Bühler and H. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology on the threshold of the new millenium. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Coyne K. and Nielsen J. (2001) Beyond ALT text: making the web easy to use for users with disabilities. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.Google Scholar
- Di Blas N., Paolini P. and Speroni M. (2004) "Usable accessibility" to the Web for blind users. In: Proceedings of 8th ERCIM Workshop: User Interfaces for All, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Disability Rights Commission.(2004) The Web:Access and inclusion for disabled people. London:TSO.Google Scholar
- Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://dublincore.org/Google Scholar
- Dublin Core Accessibility Working Group Wiki. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://dublincore.org/accessibilitywiki/Google Scholar
- IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee Resource Aggregation Model for Learning Education and Training: Activity. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://ieeeltsc.org/wg11CMI/ramlet/Google Scholar
- IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata IEEE Std 1484.12.1#8482;-2002. Retrieved November 1st 2005:http://www.ieeeltsc.org/wg12LOMGoogle Scholar
- IMS Global Learning Consortium. Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications, version 1.0. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://ncam.wgbh.org/salt/guidelines/Google Scholar
- Global Learning Consortium Learner Information Package Accessibility for LIP Version 1.0 Final Specification: Information Model, XML Binding, Best Practice Guide, Conformance Specification, Use Cases, Examples, June 2003. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibilityGoogle Scholar
- IMS Global Learning Consortium AccessForAll Meta-data Specification Version 1.0 Final Specification: Overview, Information Model, XML Binding, Best Practice Guide, Examples, July 2004. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibilityGoogle Scholar
- ISO IEC JTC1 SC36 WG7 Individualized Adaptability and Accessibility in E-learning, Education and Training. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://clhfa.jtc1sc36.org/Google Scholar
- Jordan P. (2002) Designing Pleasurable Products. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Keates S. and Clarkson J. (2004), Countering design exclusion -- An introduction to inclusive design. Springer.Google Scholar
- Kelly B., Phipps L., Swift E. (2004) Developing A Holistic Approach For E-Learning Accessibility. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2004, Vol. 30, Issue 3.Google Scholar
- Kelly B., Sloan D., Phipps L. Petrie H. and Hamilton F. (2005) Forcing Standardization or Accommodating Diversity? A Framework for Applying the WCAG in the Real World. Proceedings of W4A at WWW2005: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly B., Phipps L., Howell C. (2005) Implementing a holistic approach to e-learning accessibility, In: Cook, J. and Whitelock, D. Exploring the frontiers of e-learning: borders, outposts and migration; ALT-C 2005 12th International Conference Research Proceedings, ALT Oxford.Google Scholar
- Koyani S., Bailey R., Nall J., Allison S., Mulligan C., Bailey K. and Tolson, M. (2003) Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/guidelines_notice.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Lazar J., Dudley-Sponaugle A., and Greenidge K. (2004) Improving Web Accessibility: A Study of Webmaster Perceptions. Computers and Human Behavior, 20(2), 269--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meyer E. (2005) Is Accessible Design a Myth? In: Proceedings of W4A at WWW2005: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meyer E. A., Meyer K. S. (2005) S5: A Simple Standards-Based Slide Show System: Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/Google Scholar
- Microsoft Corporation (2003) Accessible Technology in Computing--Examining Awareness, Use, and Future Potential. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.microsoft.com/enable/research/phase2.aspxGoogle Scholar
- National Institute on Aging (2002) Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and web site accessibility guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Nevile L. (2005) User-centered accessibility supported by distributed, cumulative authoring. In Proceedings of AusWeb Conference 2005. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw05/papers/refereed/nevile/Google Scholar
- Newell A. and Gregor P. (2000) User-Sensitive Inclusive Design. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU 2000) Arlington VA. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paciello M. (2000). Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Lawrence, KA: CMP Books. Google ScholarDigital Library
- The Plain English Campaign: Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.plainenglish.co.ukGoogle Scholar
- ReadSpeaker. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.readspeaker.comGoogle Scholar
- Seeman L. (2002) Inclusion Of Cognitive Disabilities in the Web Accessibility Movement. In Proceedings of International WWW Conference (11), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
- Sloan D., Stratford J. and Gregor P. (2006) Using multimedia to enhance the accessibility of the learning environment for disabled students: reflections from the Skills for Access project. ALT-J 14(1) March 2006. Abingdon: Routledge, 39--54.Google Scholar
- Sloan M. (2001) Web Accessibility and the DDA. In: Paliwala, A. and Moreton, J (eds) The Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT) 2001 (2). Retrieved March 10th 2005: http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-2/sloan.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Support-EAM. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.support-eam.orgGoogle Scholar
- Tate Online: Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.tate.org.uk/imap/Google Scholar
- Thatcher J., Bohman P., Burks M. Henry S., Regan B., Swierenga S., Urban M. and Waddell C. (2002) Constructing accessible web sites. Birmingham, UK: glasshaus. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Theofanos M. and Redish J. (2003) Guidelines for Accessible and Usable Web Sites: Observing Users Who Work With Screen Readers. Retrieved October 24th 2005: http://redish.net/content/papers/interactions.htmlGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2000) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. February 2000. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/Google Scholar
- W3C (2005) Questions and Answers about Baseline and WCAG 2.0. Retrieved 1st March 2006: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag20-baseline.phpGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2005) Evaluation, Repair, and Transformation Tools for Web Content Accessibility. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/existingtools.htmlGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2005) Web Accessibility Initiative. Policies relating to Web accessibility. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/Google Scholar
- W3C (2004) Web Accessibility Initiative Statement on Web Access Report from UK Disability Rights Commission. Retrieved March 10th 2005: http://www.w3.org/2004/04/wai-drc-statement.htmlGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2002) User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. December 2002. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/Google Scholar
- W3C (1999) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Version 1. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/10Google Scholar
- W3C (2005) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Version 2, W3C Working Draft. Retrieved November 1st 2005: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/Google Scholar
- WebCredible. The DRC Blew it. May 2004. Retrieved March 16th 2005: http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-accessibility/drc-blew-it.shtmlGoogle Scholar
- Zeldman, J. (2003) Designing with Web standards. Indianapolis, Indiana: New Riders. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Contextual web accessibility - maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines
Comments