skip to main content
10.1145/1140491.1140512acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

3D contour perception for flow visualization

Published:28 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the most challenging problems in data visualization is the perception of 3D flow fields because judging the orientation of 3D paths is perceptually difficult. It is hypothesized that perception of the orientations of streamlines in space can greatly benefit from stereoscopic depth cues and motion parallax. In addition, because stereoscopic depth perception is a super-acuity and relies on such factors as small-scale stereoscopic disparity gradient based on texture, stereoscopic depth judgments will be exceptionally sensitive to display quality. In conventional displays, the aliasing of pixels gives completely spurious texture information to the mechanisms of stereoscopic depth perception. We carried out a study to evaluate the importance of 3D cues in perceiving the orientation of curved contours. The result showed that stereo and motion cues are essential to perceiving the orientation of 3D lines. If, however, the contours are rendered as shaded tubes, good orientation information is available even without stereo or motion depth cues.

References

  1. Cabral, B. and Leedom, C. 1993. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, '93, 27, 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Campbell, F. W. and Green, D. G. 1965. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature 209: 191--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Frisby, J. P., Buckley, D., and Duke, P. A. 1996. Evidence for recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing. Perception, 25, 129--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Geiben, M., Rumpf, M. 1993. Visualization of finite elements and tools for numerical analysis. In Advances in Scientific Visualization. F. H. Post and AJS Hin (eds) Springer Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Howard, I. P. and Rogers, B. J. 1995. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford Psychology Series No 29. Oxford University Press. Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hultquist, J. P. M. 1992. Constructing Stream Surfaces in Steady 3D Vector Fields. Proceedings of Visualization'92. 171--198 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Interrante, V., and Grosch, C. 1998. Visualizing 3D flow. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 18(4):49--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Laidlaw, D. H. Kirby, R. M., Davidson, J. S., Miller, T. S. DaSilva, M., Warren, W. H. and Tarr, M. (2001) Quantitative comparative evaluation of 2D vector visualization methods. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '01, October. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Laramee, R. S., Weiskopf, D., Schneider, J., and Hauser, H. 2004 Investigating swirl and tumble with a comparison of visualization techniques. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization (Vis 2004), 51--58, October 15--19, Austin, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. van Ee, R., and Schor, C. M. 2000. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research, 40, 151--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Norman, J. F. Todd, J. T. Perotti, V. I and Tittle, J. S. 1996. The visual perception of 3-D length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 173--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rezk-Salama, C. Hastreiter, P., Teitzel, C., and Ertl, T. 1999 Interactive exploration of volume line integral convolution based on 3D texture mapping. Proceedings IEEE Visualization '99, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rogers, B. and Cagenello, R. 1989. Disparity curvatures and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature 339: 137--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sollenberger, R. L., and Milgram, P. 1993. The effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three dimensional path tracing task. Human Factors, 35(3) 483--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Schroeder, W., Volpe, C. R. and Lorensen, W. E. 1991. The stream polygon: a technique of 3D vector field visualization. Proceedings IEEE Visualization '99, 126--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Tyler, C. 1975. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Research 15, 583--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Uumori, K. and Nishida, S. 1994. The dynamics of the visual system in combining conflicting KDE and binocular stereopsis cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(5), 526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wallach, H. 1959. The perception of motion. Scientific American. July, 56--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ware, C. and Franck, G. 1996. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 15(2) 121--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wheatstone, C. 1838. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Pert the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 128, 371--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zockler, M., Stalling, D., and Hege, H. C. 1996. Interactive Visualization of 3D Vector fields using illuminated streamlines. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '96 San Francisco. 107--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. 3D contour perception for flow visualization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
      July 2006
      181 pages
      ISBN:1595934294
      DOI:10.1145/1140491

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 July 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader