skip to main content
article

Fast proximity computation among deformable models using discrete Voronoi diagrams

Published:01 July 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present novel algorithms to perform collision and distance queries among multiple deformable models in dynamic environments. These include inter-object queries between different objects as well as intra-object queries. We describe a unified approach to compute these queries based on N-body distance computation and use properties of the 2nd order discrete Voronoi diagram to perform N-body culling. Our algorithms involve no preprocessing and also work well on models with changing topologies. We can perform all proximity queries among complex deformable models consisting of thousands of triangles in a fraction of a second on a high-end PC. Moreover, our Voronoi-based culling algorithm can improve the performance of separation distance and penetration queries by an order of magnitude.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

High Resolution
Low Resolution

References

  1. Agarwal, P., Guibas, L., Nguyen, A., Russel, D., and Zhang, L. 2004. Collision detection for deforming necklaces. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications 28, 2-3, 137--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baraff, D., and Witkin, A. 2001. Physically Based Modeling. ACM SIGGRAPH Course Notes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baraff, D., Witkin, A., and Kass, M. 2003. Untangling cloth. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 862--870. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bridson, R., Fedkiw, R., and Anderson, J. 2002. Robust treament for collisions, contact and friction for cloth animation. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 594--603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cohen, J., Lin, M., Manocha, D., and Ponamgi, M. 1995. I-COLLIDE: An interactive and exact collision detection system for large-scale environments. In Proc. of ACM Interactive 3D Graphics Conference, 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dobkin, D., Hershberger, J., Kirkpatrick, D., and Suri, S. 1993. Computing the intersection-depth of polyhedra. Algorithmica 9, 518--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ehmann, S., and Lin, M. C. 2001. Accurate and fast proximity queries between polyhedra using convex surface decomposition. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. of Eurographics'2001) 20, 3, 500--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ericson, C. 2004. Real-Time Collision Detection. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fischer, I., and Gotsman, C. 2005. Fast approximation of high order Voronoi diagrams and distance transforms on the GPU. Technical report CS TR-07-05, Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, S., and Lin, M. C. 2001. Deformed distance fields for simulation of non-penetrating flexible bodies. Proc. of EG Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation, 99--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Govindaraju, N., Redon, S., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2003. CULLIDE: Interactive collision detection between complex models in large environments using graphics hardware. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Workshop on Graphics Hardware, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Govindaraju, N., Knott, D., Jain, N., Kabal, I., Tamstorf, R., Gayle, R., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2005. Collision detection between deformable models using chromatic decomposition. ACM Trans. on Graphics (Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH) 24, 3, 991--999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heidelberger, B., Teschner, M., Keisner, R., Mueller, M., and Gross, M. 2004. Consistent penetration depth estimation for deformable collision response. Proc. of Vision, Modeling and Visualization, 315--322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoff, K., Zaferakis, A., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2002. Fast 3d geometric proximity queries between rigid and deformable models using graphics hardware acceleration. Tech. Rep. TR02-004, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. James, D. L., and Pai, D. K. 2004. BD-Tree: Output-sensitive collision detection for reduced deformable models. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 393--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Johnson, D. E., and Cohen, E. 2004. Unified distance queries in a heterogeneous model environment. In ASME DETC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawachi, K., and Suzuki, H. 2000. Distance computation between non-convex polyhedra at short range based on discrete Voronoi diagrams. IEEE Geometric Modeling and Processing, 123--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kim, Y. J., Otaduy, M. A., Lin, M. C., and Manocha, D. 2002. Fast penetration depth computation for physically-based animation. In Proc. of ACM/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 23--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Knott, D., and Pai, D. K. 2003. CInDeR: Collision and interference detection in real-time using graphics hardware. Proc. of Graphics Interface, 73--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Larsen, E., Gottschalk, S., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. 2000. Distance queries with rectangular swept sphere volumes. Proc. of IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3719--3726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsson, T., and Akenine-Möller, T. 2001. Collision detection for continuously deforming bodies. In Eurographics, 325--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin, M., and Canny, J. F. 1991. Efficient algorithms for incremental distance computation. In IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1008--1014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin, M. C., and Manocha, D. 2004. Collision and proximity queries. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd Ed., J. E. Goodman and J. O'Rourke, Eds. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, ch. 35, 787--807.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mirtich, B. 1998. V-Clip: Fast and robust polyhedral collision detection. ACM Transactions on Graphics 17, 3 (July), 177--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mueller, M., Heidelberger, B., Teschner, M., and Gross, M. 2005. Meshless deformation based on shape matching. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 471--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Okabe, A., Boots, B., and Sugihara, K. 1992. Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Quinlan, S. 1994. Efficient distance computation between non-convex objects. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3324--3329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Redon, S., and Lin, M. 2006. A fast method for local penetration depth computation. Journal of Graphics Tools, To Appear.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Redon, S., Kim, Y. J., Lin, M. C., and Manocha, D. 2004. Fast continuous collision detection for articulated models. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sigg, C., Peikert, R., and Gross, M. 2003. Signed distance transform using graphics hardware. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sud, A., Otaduy, M. A., and Manocha, D. 2004. DiFi: Fast 3D distance field computation using graphics hardware. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics) 23, 3, 557--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sud, A., Govindaraju, N., Gayle, R., and Manocha, D. 2006. Interactive 3d distance field computation using linear factorization. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, 117--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sud, A., Govindaraju, N., Gayle, R., and Manocha, D. 2006. Surface distance maps. Tech. Rep. TR06-011, Dept of Computer Science, University of North Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sundaraj, K., and Laugier, C. 2000. Fast contact localization of moving deformable polyhedra. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Teschner, M., Heidelberger, B., Muller, M., Pomeranets, D., and Gross, M. 2003. Optimized spatial hashing for collision detection of deformable objects. Proc. of Vision, Modeling and Visualization, 47--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Teschner, M., Kimmerle, S., Heidelberger, B., Zachmann, G., Raghupathi, L., Fuhrmann, A., Cani, M.-P., Faure, F., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Strasser, W., and Volino, P. 2005. Collision detection for deformable objects. Computer Graphics Forum 19, 1, 61--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. van den Bergen, G. 1997. Efficient collision detection of complex deformable models using AABB trees. Journal of Graphics Tools 2, 4, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Volino, P., and Thalmann, N. M. 2000. Accurate collision response on polygon meshes. In Proc. of Computer Animation, 154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fast proximity computation among deformable models using discrete Voronoi diagrams

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
            ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 25, Issue 3
            July 2006
            742 pages
            ISSN:0730-0301
            EISSN:1557-7368
            DOI:10.1145/1141911
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 2006
            Published in tog Volume 25, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader