"Ninja Looting" for instructional design: the design challenges of creating a game-based learning environment

ABSTRACT

Computer and video games have become an increasingly prevalent form of entertainment. While the primary purpose of games is entertainment, the underlying design employs a variety of strategies and techniques which require players to analyze, synthesize, and to use critical thinking skills. Ironically, these are also many of the same types of critical thinking skills educators and instructional designers attempt to foster when creating educational materials and media. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of a 3D game-based learning environment and to highlight some of the issues that arose during the design, development, and production. Specifically, this paper presents (a) game design elements which can be appropriated (looted) from game design, (b) cognitive research that supports the integration of the elements for instructional design, (c) a discussion of challenges encountered while creating a 3D game-based learning environment with limited resources, and (d) various low-cost and free resources (to avoid ninja looting).

References

1. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., and Squire, K. 2001. Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition and Instruction. 19, 1, 47--94.
2. Bers, M. 1999. Zora: a graphical multi-user environment to share stories about the self. In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL'99), 33--40.
3. Bers, M. and Cassell, J. 1999. Interactive storytelling systems for children: using technology to explore language and identity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9, 2, 603--609.
4. Bowman, R. F. 1982. A "Pac-Man" theory of motivation: Tactile implications for classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 2, 9, 14--17.
5. Bruckman, A. 1997. Moose Crossing: Construction, community, and learning in a networked virtual world for kids. Ph.D Thesis, MIT.
6. Carson, D. 2000. Environmental storytelling: Creating immersive 3D worlds using lessons learned from the theme park industry. Gamasutra. http://www.gamasutra.com/features/20000301/carson_pfv.htm
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R. 1980. Intrinsic rewards in school crime. In Verble, M. (Ed.), Dealing in Discipline. University of Mid-America Press.
8. Dickey, M. D. 2005. Engaging by Design: How Engagements strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 2, 67--83.
9. Dickey, M. D. 2006. Game Design Narrative for Learning: Appropriating Adventure Game Design Narrative Devices and Techniques for the Design of Interactive Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 3.
10. Gee, J. P. 2003. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave.
11. Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., and Oliver, K. 1999. Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth, (Ed.) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Vol. II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 115--140.
12. Interactive Digital Software Association (IDSA), 2002. Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.idsa.com.
13. Jenkins, H. 2002. Game design as narrative architecture. http://web.mit.edu/21fms/www/faculty/henry3/games&narrative.html#1.
14. Jonassen, D. 1999. Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth, (Ed.) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Vol. II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 215--240.
15. Malone, T. W. 1981. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333--369.
16. Malone, T. W., and Lepper, M. R. 1987. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.). Aptitude, learning and instruction. Volume 3: Cognitive and affective process analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Polkinghorne, D. E. 1988. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. University of New York Press.
18. Prensky, M., 2001. Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.
19. Provenzo, E. F. 1991. Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Harvard University Press.
20. Rieber, L. P. 1996. Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 2, 43--58.
21. Robinson, J. A. and Hawpe, L. 1986. Narrative thinking as a heuristic process. In T. E. Sarbin, (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. Praeger.
22. Squire, K. 2003. Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming 2, 1.
23. Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster.
24. Winn, W. 2002. Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 3, 331--351.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

    • Computer-assisted instruction

    • Computer-managed instruction

  • Enterprise computing

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Animation

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)