skip to main content
10.1145/1179295.1179336acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Attribute activation: an approach for learning visual representation

Published:30 July 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper will present an instructional approach entitled, "Attribute Activation" for creating and understanding visual representations. This is a technique based on cognitive theory. It will facilitate the construction and critique of visual images by slowing students down to be systematic. This instructional approach will encourage students to identify the important elements of a portrayal and understand how meaning is constructed. This document includes a literature review that explores the power of visual literacy for learning, a brief exploration of individual differences in visual processing, visual selectivity, visual problem solving, and attribute activation theory. It goes on to describe how new media and technology can be used to enhance the Attribute Activation technique. Finally, the implications for visual education will be discussed.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Low Resolution
High Resolution

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. 1983. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arnheim, R. (1974). Virtues and vices of the visual media, chapter viii. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Media and symbols: The forms of expression, communication, and education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, R. 1999. Representation construction, externalized cognition and individual differences. Learn and Instruction, 9(4), 343--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Daley, E. 2003. Expanding the concept of literacy {electronic version}. Educause Review(Mar./Apr.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Flattley, R. n. d. Visual literacy. Retrieved Feb. 21, 2004, from http://dtc.pima.edu/psychology/Visual_Literacy.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hart, R. P., & O'Shanick, G. J. 1993. Forgetting rates for verbal, pictorial, and figural stimuli. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 245--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kargopoulos, P., Bablekou, Z., Gonida, E., & Kiosseoglou, G. 2003. Effects of face and name presentation on memory for associated verbal descriptors. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 415--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kozma, R. B. 1991. Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kuhn, D. (1984). Cognitive development, chapter 4. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hand. In H. Kuklick & E. Long (Eds.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of cultures past and present (Vol. 6). London: JAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Levi, W. H., & Lentz, R. 1982. Effects of text illustrations: A review of the research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lohse, G. I., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., & Rueter, H. H. 1994. A classification of visual representations. Communication of the ACM, 37(12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lowe, R. 2000. Visual literacy and learning in science: Eric digest. Retrieved Apr. 10, 2003, from http://www.eduref.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Massironi, M. 2002. The psychology of graphic images: Seeing, drawing, communicating: L. Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer, R. E. 1976. Comprehension as affected by structure of problem representation. Memory and Cognition, 4, 249--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia learning: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Norman, D. A. 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine: Perseus Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. O'Donnell, A. 1992. Searching for information in knowledge maps and texts. Paper presented at the 25th International Congress of Psychology, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Olson, D. R. 1985. Computer as tools of the intellect. Educational Researcher, 14(5), 5--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rieber, L. P. 1995. A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 45--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Spiro, R., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Nix & Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, & multimedia (pp. 203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Steed, M. B. 1994. Effects of computer simulation construction on shifts in cognitive representation: A case study using stella. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Steed, M. B. 2001, March. 3d visualization. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual ATACC conference, Jasper Park Lodge, Jasper, Alberta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor, R. P., & Cunnif, N. (1987). Graphical vs. Textual representation: An empirical study of novices' program comprehension. In G. M. Olson, S. Shepard & E. Soloway (Eds.), Empirical studies of programmers: Second workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tufte, E. R. 2000. Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative (Fourth printing, with revisions, April 2000. -- ed.): Graphics Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Vekiri, I. 2002. What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Watkins, J. K., Miller, E., & Brubaker, D. 2004. The role of the visual image: What are students really learning from pictorial representations? Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 23--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Weir, S. 1987. Cultivating minds: A logo casebook. New York: Harper & Row. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Winn, B. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials, chapter 5. In H. A. Houghton & D. M. Willows (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Vol 1. Basic research (pp. 152--198). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, L. 1967. Philosophical investigations (3rd edn ed.). Oxford: tr. G. E. M. Anscombe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Attribute activation: an approach for learning visual representation

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGGRAPH '06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators program
              July 2006
              246 pages
              ISBN:1595933646
              DOI:10.1145/1179295

              Copyright © 2006 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 30 July 2006

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader