10.1145/12178.12189acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshpwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

User technology—from pointing to pondering

Published:09 January 1986Publication History

ABSTRACT

From its beginning, the technology of personal workstations has been driven by visions of a future in which people would work in intimate partnership with computer systems on significant intellectual tasks. These visions have been expressed in various forms: Memex (Bush, 1945), Man-Machine Symbiosis (Licklider, 1960), NLS (Engelbart, 1963), Dynabook (Kay, 1977), and others.

The tight coupling between human and computer required by these visions necessitated advances in the ways humans and computers interact. These advances have slowly begun to accumulate into what might be called a user technology. This user technology includes hardware and software techniques for building effective user interfaces: bitmapped displays, menus, pointing devices, “modeless” command languages, animation, and interface metaphors. But it must include a technical understanding of the user himself and of the nature of human-computer interaction. This latter part, the scientific base of user technology, is necessary in order to understand why interaction techniques are (or are not) successful, to help us invent new techniques, and to pave the way for machines that aid humans in performing significant intellectual tasks.

In this paper, we trace some of the history of our understanding of users and their interaction with workstation—the personal part of personal workstations. In keeping with the spirit of other papers at this conference, we have centered this review around our own experiences, perspectives, and work and have not attempted a complete history of the field. In concentrating on our own work, we do not wish to mimimize the importance of others' work; we simply want to tell our own story. Our focus is on what we have learned about users in our years of studying them and how we see our findings relating to the original visions of the personal workstation.

References

  1. Anderson, 3. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, C. G., & Newell, A. (1971). Computer structures: readings and examples. New York: McGraw- Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, August.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Card, S. K. (1978). Studies in the psychology of computer text editing systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601-613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1976). The manuscript editing task: A routine cognitive skill (Technical Report SSL-76-8). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980a). Computer text-editing: an information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 32-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980b). The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM 23, 396-410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer Interaction. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Card, S. K., Pavel, M., & Farrell, J. E. (1984). Window-based computer dialogues. Proceedings of IFIPInteract '84, 355-359. London: IFIP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelbart, D. (1963). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect. In P. W. Howerton and D. C. Weeks (Eds.), Vistas in hoCormation Handling, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Spartan Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. English, W. K., Engelbart, D. C., & Berman, M. A. (1967). Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. 1EEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, 5-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Halasz, F. G. (1984). Mental models and problem solving in using a calculator. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Halasz, F. G., & Moran, T. P. (1983). Mental models and problem solving in using a calculator. Proceedings of the CHI '83 Conference on tIuman Factors in ComputhzgSystems. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Irby, C., Bergsteinsson, L., Moran, T. P., Newman, W., & Tesler, L. (1977). A methodology for user interface design. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kay, A. (1977). Microelectronics and the personal computer. Scientific American, September, 230-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-I (March), 4-11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Moran, T. P. (1978). Introduction to the Command Language Grammar (Technical Report SSL-78-3). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Moran, T. P. (1981). The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 3-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Moran, T. P. (1983). Getting into a system: external-internal task mapping analysis. Proceedings of the CHI "83 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Newman, W., & Sproull, R. (1979). Principles of interactive computer graphics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Payne, S. J. (1984). Task-action grammars. Proceedings of Interact "84: First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, London. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Young, R. M. (1981). The machine inside the machine: users' models of pocket calculators. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 51-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Young, R. M. (1983). Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User technology—from pointing to pondering

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              HPW '86: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on The history of personal workstations
              January 1986
              198 pages
              ISBN:0897911768
              DOI:10.1145/12178

              Copyright © 1986 ACM

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 9 January 1986

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Qualifiers

              • Article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader
            About Cookies On This Site

            We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

            Learn more

            Got it!