Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices

ABSTRACT

Transfer scenarios is a method developed to support the design of innovative interactive technology. Such a method should help the designer to come up with inventive ideas, and at the same time provide grounding in real human needs. In transfer scenarios, we use marginal practices to encourage a changed mindset throughout the design process. A marginal practice consists of individuals who share an activity that they find meaningful. We regard these individuals not as end-users, but as valuable input in the design process. We applied this method when designing novel applications for autonomous embodied agents, e.g. robots. Owners of unusual pets, such as snakes and spiders, were interviewed - not with the intention to design robot pets, but to determine underlying needs and interests of their practice. The results were then used to design a set of applications for more general users, including a dynamic living-room wall and a set of communicating hobby robots.

References

1. Bell, G., Blythe, M. and Sengers, P., Making by Making Strange: Defamiliarization and the Design of Domestic Technologies. In Computer-Human Interaction Vol 12, No 2, ACM Transactions (2005), 149--173.
2. Buchenau, M. and Fulton Suri, J. Experience prototyping. In Proc. DIS'00, ACM Press (2000), 424--433.
3. Bødker, S. and Buur, J. The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 9, No. 2 pp. 152--169, June 2002.
4. Denning, P. J. 2004. The social life of innovation. Commun. ACM 47, 4 (2004), 15--19.
5. Djajadiningrat J. P., Gaver, W. and Fres, J.W. Interaction Rebelling and Extreme Characters: Methods for Exploring Aesthetic Interactions In Proc. DIS'00, ACM Press (2000) 66--71.
6. Dourish, P. Implications for Design. In Proc. CHI 06, ACM Press (2006), 541--550.
7. ECAgents project. http://ecagents.istc.cnr.it/
8. E-puck robots. http://lsa.epfl.ch/~mondada/e-puck/
9. Fong, T. Nourbakhsh I. and Dautenhahn K. A survey of Socially Interactive Robots, In Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (2003), 143--166.
10. Gaver, W., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes In Interactions Vol 6, No 1 (1999), 21--29.
11. Gemperle, F., DiSalvo, C., Forlizzi, J., and Yonkers, W. 2003. The Hug: a new form for communication. In Proc. of DUX '03, ACM Press (2003), 1--4.
12. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1992.
13. Holmquist, Lars Erik. User-Driven Innovation in the Future Applications Lab. Ext. Abstracts of CHI'04, ACM Press (2004), 1091--1092.
14. Håkansson, M., Ljungblad, S. and Holmquist L. E. Capturing the Invisible: Designing Context-Aware Photography. In Proc. of DUX'03, ACM/AIGA (2003).
15. Håkansson, M., Gaye, L. Ljungblad, S. and Holmquist, L.E. More Than Meets the Eye: An Exploratory User Study of Context Photography. In Proc. NordiCHI'06, (2006).
16. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., and Eiderbäck, B. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proc. CHI '03. ACM Press (2003), 17--24.
17. Kujala, S. and Kauppinen, M. 2004. Identifying and selecting users for user-centered design. In Proc. NordiCHI'04, ACM Press (2004), 297--303.
18. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1985.
19. Ljungblad, S., Håkansson, M., Gaye, L. and Holmquist, L. E. Context Photography: Modifying the Digital Camera Into a New Creative Tool. In Ext. Abstracts of CHI'04, ACM Press (2004), 24--29.
20. Ljungblad S. Walter, K., Jacobsson, M. and Holmquist, L. E. Designing Personal Embodied Agents with Personas. In Proc. Ro-Man'06, IEEE Press (2006).
21. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman E. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective of Information Technology, MIT Press, USA, 2004.
22. Mackay, W. E., Ratzer, A. V., and Janecek, P. Video artifacts for design: bridging the Gap between abstraction and detail. In Proc. DIS'00, ACM Press (2000), 72--82.
23. Maes P. Modeling Adaptive Autonomous Systems Artificial Life 1 (1994), 135--162.
24. Macdonald, N. Beyond Human Centered Design? Interactions Vol 12, No 2, (2005) 75--79.
25. Marti, S. and Schmandt, C. Physical Embodiments for Mobile Communication Agents. In Proc. of UIST'05, ACM Press (2005), 231--240.
26. Muller, M.J. and Kuhn, S. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 24--28, June 1993.
27. Pruitt, J. and Grudin, J. Personas: Practice and theory. In Proc. DUX'03, (2003), 1--15.
28. Rogers, Y. and Belotti, V. Grounding blue-sky research: How Can Ethnography Help? Interactions, Vol 4, No 3 (1997), 58--63
29. Sengers, P. Autobiographical Design. CHI 2006 Workshop on Theory and Method for Experience-Centred Design, 2006.
30. Spinosa, C. Dreyfus, H. and Flores F. Disclosing New Worlds. MIT Press, 1997.
31. Von Hippel, E. Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts, Management Science 32, No 7 July (1986), 791--805.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • HCI theory, concepts and models

  • Interaction design

    • Interaction design process and methods

      • Interface design prototyping

      • User centered design

    • Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms