skip to main content
article

Impact of Internet-based distributed monitoring systems on offshore sourcing of services

Published:01 August 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The use of Internet-based distributed monitoring systems has allowed firms to source services globally that were hitherto thought of as being too risky or complex to execute offshore. These systems enable buyers of such services (clients) to monitor the execution of processes in real-time and exert a degree of managerial control over information workers of another firm located in a distant region. Our research shows that process codifiability plays a key role in determining output quality. Further, we show that the efforts made by the client and the provider in monitoring work via Internet-based monitoring mechanisms have a significant impact on output quality. Finally, we show that these monitoring mechanisms enable clients and providers of services to focus on those processes that are best managed by each entity. This scheme of optimal allocation of monitoring effort is termed by us as the efficient monitoring frontier.

References

  1. Aron, D. and Olivcila, P. 1994. Bonus and penalty schemes as equilibrium incentive devices, with application to manufacturing systems. J. Law Econ. Organiz. 10, 1, 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aron, R., Bandyopadhyay, S., Jayanty, S., and Pathak, P. To appear. Monitoring process quality in offshore outsourcing: A model and findings from multi-country survey. J. Oper. Manag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, R., Clemons, E. K., and Reddi, S. 2005. Just right outsourcing: Understanding and managing strategic risk. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 22, 2, 37--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Aron, R. and Singh, J. 2005. Getting offshoring right. Harv. Bus. Rev. (Dec.) 135--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, G. 1992. Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Politi. Econ. 100, 3, 598--614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bakos, J. and Brynjolfsson, E. 1993. Information technology, incentives and the optimal number of suppliers. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 10, 2, 37--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brynjolfsson, E. 1994. Information assets, technology, and organization. Manag. Sci. 40, 12, 1645--1662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T., Gurbaxani, V., and Kambil, A. 1994. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Manag. Sci. 40, 12 (Dec.), 1628--1644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gartner. 2005. Business process outsourcing: Research Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurbaxani, V. and Whang, S. 1991. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Comm. ACM 34, 59--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hitt, L. 1999. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Sys. Resear. 10, 134--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1992. Knowledge, control and organizational structure, Parts I and II. In Contract Economics, Wen, L. and Wijkander, H. Eds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 251--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [email protected]. 2005a. As the BPO business grows, there's a greater focus on metrics and measurement. Knowledge &commet; Wharton. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&id=1102Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [email protected]. 2005b. How some BPO providers seek to build and protect their turf. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&id=1101Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [email protected]. 2005c. The little start-up that could: A conversation with Raman Roy, father of Indian BPO. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=794.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Levy, F. and Murnane, R. 2004. The New Division of Labor. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lewis, T. and Sappington, D. 1991. Incentives for monitoring quality. The RAND J. Econ. 22, 3, 370--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Malone, T., Yates, J., and Benjamin, R. 1987. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun. ACM 30, 6, 484--497. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. NASSCOM. 2005. The NASSCOM-McKinsey Study. Research Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Starbird, S. 2001. Penalties, rewards, and inspection: Provisions for quality in supply chain contracts. J. Opera. Res. Soc. 52, 1, 109--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Impact of Internet-based distributed monitoring systems on offshore sourcing of services

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!