Abstract
How will a virus propagate in a real network? How long does it take to disinfect a network given particular values of infection rate and virus death rate? What is the single best node to immunize? Answering these questions is essential for devising network-wide strategies to counter viruses. In addition, viral propagation is very similar in principle to the spread of rumors, information, and “fads,” implying that the solutions for viral propagation would also offer insights into these other problem settings. We answer these questions by developing a nonlinear dynamical system (NLDS) that accurately models viral propagation in any arbitrary network, including real and synthesized network graphs. We propose a general epidemic threshold condition for the NLDS system: we prove that the epidemic threshold for a network is exactly the inverse of the largest eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix. Finally, we show that below the epidemic threshold, infections die out at an exponential rate. Our epidemic threshold model subsumes many known thresholds for special-case graphs (e.g., Erdös--Rényi, BA powerlaw, homogeneous). We demonstrate the predictive power of our model with extensive experiments on real and synthesized graphs, and show that our threshold condition holds for arbitrary graphs. Finally, we show how to utilize our threshold condition for practical uses: It can dictate which nodes to immunize; it can assess the effects of a throttling policy; it can help us design network topologies so that they are more resistant to viruses.
- Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. 2002. Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control. Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Bailey, N. 1975. The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its Applications. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
- Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509--512.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Berger, N., Borgs, C., Chayes, J. T., and Saberi, A. 2005. On the spread of viruses in the internet. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm (SODA). Vancouver, BC, Canada. 301--310. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Boguñá, M. and Pastor-Satorras, R. 2002. Epidemic spreading in correlated complex networks. Physical Review E 66, 047104.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Briesemeister, L., Lincoln, P., and Porras, P. 2003. Epidemic profiles and defense of scale-free networks. WORM 2003. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Chung, F., Lu, L., and Vu, V. 2003a. Eigenvalues of random power law graphs. Annals of Combinatorics 7, 21--33.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Chung, F., Lu, L., and Vu, V. 2003b. Spectra of random graphs with given expected degrees. PNA 100, 11 (May 27), 6313--6318.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Cohen, R., Havlin, S., and ben Avraham, D. 2003. Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations. Physical Review Letters 91 (Dec.), 34.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Eguiluz, V. M. and Klemm, K. 2002. Epidemic threshold in structured scale-free networks. arXiv:cond-mat/02055439.Google Scholar
- Erdös, P. and Rényi, A. 1960. On the evolution of random graphs. In Publication 5. Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary. 17--61.Google Scholar
- Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., and Faloutsos, C. 1999. On power-law relationship of the internet topology. In Proceedings of ACM Sigcomm 1999. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ganesh, A., Massoulié, L., and Towsley, D. 2005. The effect of network topology on the spread of epidemics. In INFOCOM.Google Scholar
- Hayashi, Y., Minoura, M., and Matsukubo, J. 2003. Recoverable prevalence in growing scale-free networks and the effective immunization. arXiv:cond-mat/0305549 v2.Google Scholar
- Hethcote, H. W. 2000. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Review 42, 599--653. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hethcote, H. W. and Yorke, J. A. 1984. Gonorrhea Transmission Dynamics and Control. Vol. 56. Springer. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, M. W. and Smale, S. 1974. Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Kephart, J. O. and White, S. R. 1991. Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses. In Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. 343--359.Google Scholar
- Kephart, J. O. and White, S. R. 1993. Measuring and modeling computer virus prevalence. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. 2--15. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kumar, S. R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., and Tomkins, A. 1999. Trawling the web for emerging cyber-communities. Computer Networks 31, 11--16, 1481--1493. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- MacCluer, C. R. 2000. The many proofs and applications of perron's theorem. SIAM Review 42, 3, 487--498. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Madar, N., Kalisky, T., Cohen, R., ben Avraham, D., and Havlin, S. 2004. Immunization and epidemic dynamics in complex networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 2, 269--276.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Martin, H., Ed. 2002. The Virus Bulletin: Independent Anti-Virus Advice. World Wide Web, http://www.virusbtn.com. Ongoing.Google Scholar
- McKendrick, A. G. 1926. Applications of mathematics to medical problems. In Proceedings of Edin. Math. Society. Vol. 14. 98--130.Google Scholar
- Medina, A., Lakhina, A., Matta, I., and Byers, J. 2001. Brite: Universal topology generation from a user's perspective. Tech. Rep. BUCS-TR2001-003, Boston University. World Wide Web, http://www.cs.bu.edu/brite/publications/. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Moreno, Y., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Vespignani, A. 2002. Epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks. The European Physical Journal B 26, 521--529.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Newman, M. E. J., Forrest, S., and Balthrop, J. 2002. Email networks and the spread of computer viruses. Physical Review E 66, 035101(R).Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pastor-Satorras, R. and Vespignani, A. 2001a. Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Physical Review E 63, 066117.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pastor-Satorras, R. and Vespignani, A. 2001b. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters 86, 14 (2 April), 3200--3203.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pastor-Satorras, R. and Vespignani, A. 2002a. Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. Physical Review E 65, 035108.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Pastor-Satorras, R. and Vespignani, A. 2002b. Epidemics and immunization in scale-free networks. In Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet, S. Bornholdt and H. G. Schuster, Eds. Wiley-VCH, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Richardson, M. and Domingos, P. 2001. Mining the network value of customers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco, CA. 57--66. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ripeanu, M., Foster, I., and Iamnitchi, A. 2002. Mapping the gnutella network: Properties of large-scale peer-to-peer systems and implications for system design. IEEE Internet Computing Journal 6, 1. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wang, C., Knight, J. C., and Elder, M. C. 2000. On computer viral infection and the effect of immunization. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wang, Y., Chakrabarti, D., Wang, C., and Faloutsos, C. 2003. Epidemic spreading in real networks: An eigenvalue viewpoint. In SRDS.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Epidemic thresholds in real networks
Recommendations
Structure optimization based on memetic algorithm for adjusting epidemic threshold on complex networks
Graphical abstractIn the paper, the control of epidemic spreading is modeled as an optimization problem. The threshold of a network depends fundamentally on the network structure itself, so we can control the threshold by adjust the network structure. ...
Push- and pull-based epidemic spreading in networks: Thresholds and deeper insights
Understanding the dynamics of computer virus (malware, worm) in cyberspace is an important problem that has attracted a fair amount of attention. Early investigations for this purpose adapted biological epidemic models, and thus inherited the so-called ...
The viral conductance of a network
Besides the epidemic threshold, the recently proposed viral conductance @j by Kooij et al. [11] may be regarded as an additional characterizer of the viral robustness of a network, that measures the overall ease in which viruses can spread in a ...






Comments