10.1145/129712.129782acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract)

Published:01 July 1992Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this note, we present new zero-knowledge interactive proofs and arguments for languages in NP. To show that x ε L, with an error probability of at most 2-k, our zero-knowledge proof system requires O(|x|c1)+O(lgc2|x|)k ideal bit commitments, where c1 and c2 depend only on L. This construction is the first in the ideal bit commitment model that achieves large values of k more efficiently than by running k independent iterations of the base interactive proof system. Under suitable complexity assumptions, we exhibit zero knowledge arguments that require O(lgc|x|kl bits of communication, where c depends only on L, and l is the security parameter for the prover. This is the first construction in which the total amount of communication can be less than that needed to transmit the NP witness. Our protocols are based on efficiently checkable proofs for NP[4].

References

  1. 1.J. Boyar, G. Brassard and R. Peralta. Subquadratic Zero-knowledge Proc. of Focsgl Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.G. Brassard and C. Cr#peau. Non-Transitive Transfer of Confidence: A Perfect Zero-Knowledge Interactive Protocol for SAT and Beyond, Proc. of FOCS86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.G. Brassard, D. Chaum, and C. Cr#peau. Minimum Disclosure Proofs of Knowledge, J. Comp#t. System Sci. 37 (1988), 156-189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.L. Bahai, L. Fortnow, L. Levin and M. Szegedy. Checking computation in polylogarithmic time. Proc. of STOC91 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.J. Boyar, M. Krentel and S. Kurtz. A discrete logarithm implementation of perfect zero-knowledge blobs. Journal of Cryptology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 63- 76, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff. The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems, SIAM J. Comput. 18 (1989), 186-208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and R. Rivest. A Paradoxical Solution to the Signature Problem. Proc. of. FOCS84 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson. Proofs that Yield Nothing but Their Validity and a Methodology of Cryptographic Protocol Design, Proc. of FOCS86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson. How to Play ANY Mental Game, Proc. of STOC87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.R. Impagliazzo and M. Yung. Direct Minimum- Knowledge Computation, Proc. of CRYPTO87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.J. Kilian, S. Micali and R. Ostrovsky. Minimum Resource Zero-Knowledge Proofs, Proc. of FOCS89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract)

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            STOC '92: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
            July 1992
            794 pages
            ISBN:0897915119
            DOI:10.1145/129712

            Copyright © 1992 ACM

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 1992

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 1,369 of 4,226 submissions, 32%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!