skip to main content
10.1145/1366110.1366194acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesglsvlsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Using reiterative LFSR based X-masking to increase output compression in presence of unknowns

Published:04 May 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of increasing unknowns in the output response data by exploring reiterative LFSR reseeding based X-masking. This approach takes advantage of the data correlation in the output response data to enable LFSR encoded masks to be reused for multiple scan slices while guaranteeing that all unknowns are masked and all bits required for fault detection are allowed to propagate to the compactor. This paper also investigates a hybrid approach that combines conventional LFSR reseeding based X-masking with fixed-interval reiterative LFSR X-masking. Experimental results for applying this approach to industrial designs indicate that significant amounts of output compression can be achieved without any pattern count inflation or loss in fault coverage.

References

  1. Touba, N.A., "Survey of Test Vector Compression Techniques," IEEE Design & Test, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 294-303, Jul. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Wang, L.T., C.-W. Wu, X. Wen, VLSI Test Principles and Architectures, Morgan Kaufmann, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barnhart, C., V. Brunkhorst, F. Distler, O. Farnsworth, B. Keller, and B. Koenemann, "OPMISR: the Foundation for Compressed ATPG Vectors," Proc. of International Test Conference , pp. 748-757, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wohl, P., J.A. Waicukauski, S. Patel, and M.B. Amin, "X-Tolerant Compression and Application of Scan-ATPG Patterns in a BIST Architecture," Proc. of International Test Conference, pp. 727-736, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wohl, P., J.A. Waicukauski, and S. Patel, "Scalable Selector Architecture for X-Tolerant Deterministic BIST," Proc. of Design Automation Conference, pp. 934-939, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pomeranz, I., S. Kundu, and S.M. Reddy, "On Output Response Compression in the Presense of Unknown Output Values," Proc. of Design Automation Conference, pp. 255-258, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chickermane, V., B. Foutz, and B. Keller, "Channel Masking Synthesis for Efficient On-Chip Test Compression," Proc. of International Test Conference, pp. 452-461, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Naruse, M., I. Pomeranz, S.M. Reddy, and S. Kundu, "On-Chip Compression of Output Responses with Unknown Values Using LFSR Reseeding," Proc. of International Test Conference, pp. 1060-1068, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Volkerink, E.H., and S. Mitra, "Response Compaction with Any Number of Unknowns Using a New LFSR Architecture," Proc. of Design Automation Conference, pp. 117-122, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chao, M. C.-T., S. Wang, S.T. Chakradhar, and K.-T. Cheng, "Response Shaper: A Novel Technique to Enhance Unknown Tolerance for Output Response Compaction," Proc. of International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 80-87, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mitra, S., and K.S. Kim, "X-Compact: An Efficient Response Compaction Scheme," IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 421-432, Mar. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rajski, J., J. Tyszer, C. Wang, and S.M. Reddy, "Finite Memory Test Response Compactors for Embedded Test Applications," IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 622-634, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Touba, N.A., "X-Canceling MISR -- An X-Tolerant Methodology for Compacting Output Responses with Unknowns Using a MISR," Proc. of International Test Conference, Paper 6.2, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using reiterative LFSR based X-masking to increase output compression in presence of unknowns

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GLSVLSI '08: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI
        May 2008
        480 pages
        ISBN:9781595939999
        DOI:10.1145/1366110

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 May 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate312of1,156submissions,27%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader