skip to main content
research-article

ViSAGE: A Virtual Laboratory for Simulation and Analysis of Social Group Evolution

Published:13 August 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present a modeling laboratory, Virtual Laboratory for the Simulation and Analysis of Social Group Evolution (ViSAGE), that views the organization of human communities and the experience of individuals in a community as contingent upon on the dynamic properties, or micro-laws, of social groups. The laboratory facilitates the theorization and validation of these properties through an iterative research processes that involves (1) forward simulation experiments, which are used to formalize dynamic group properties, (2) reverse engineering from real data on how the parameters are distributed among individual actors in the community, and (3) grounded research, such as participant observation, that follows specific activities of real actors in a community and determines if, or how well, the micro-laws describe the way choices are made in real world, local settings. In this article we report on the design of ViSAGE. We first give some background to the model. Next we detail each component. We then describe a set of simulation experiments that we used to further design and clarify ViSAGE as a tool for studying emergent properties/phenomena in social networks.

References

  1. Adamic, L. and Ader, E. 2003. Friends and neighbours on the web. Social Netw., 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. 2006. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Billari, F., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., and Scheffran, J., Eds. 2006. Agent-Based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bloor, D. 1999. Anti-latour. Studies Hist. Philos. Sci. 30, 1, 80--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., and Everett, M. G. 1998. Network measures of social capital. Connections 21, 2, 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Butler, B. S. 1999. The Dynamics of cyberspace: Examining and modelling online social structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, D. 2002. Interpreting Quantitative Data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chattoe, E. 2002. Review: computational techniques for modelling learning in economics. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 5, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, R. 1994. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociol. Forum 9, 2, 155--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Diwan, R. 2000. Relational wealth and the quality of life. J. Socio-Econ. 29, 305--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Epstein, J. M. 1999. Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4, 5, 41--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Epstein, J. M. and Axtell, R. 1996. Growing Artifical Societies: Social Science From the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Freeman, L. C. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., and Taskar, B. 2003. Learning probabilistic models of link structure. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 679--707. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Glasser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Reserach. Aldine Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg, M., Horn, P., Magdon-Ismail, M., Riposo, J., Wallace, W., and Yener, B. 2003. Statistical modeling of social groups on communication networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Grimm, V. and Railsback, S. F. 2005. Individual-Based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton series in theoretical and computational biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoff, P., Raftery, A., and Handcock, M. 2002. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. Amer. Statis. Assoc., 1090--1098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kadushin, C. 2004. Too much social capital? Soc. Netw. 26, 75--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kohler, T. A. and Gumerman, G. J. 2000. Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies: Agent-Based Modeling of Social and Spatial Processes. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kohler, T. A., Johnson, D. C., Varien, M., Ortman, S., Reynolds, R., Kobti, Z., Cowan, J., Kolm, K., Smith, S., and Yap, L. 2007. Settlment ecodynamics in the prehispanic central mesa verde region. In The Model-Based Archaeology of Socionatural Systems, T. A. Kohler and S. E. van der Leeuw, Eds. SAR Press, Santa Fe, NM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., and Couper, M. 2004. Psychological reserach online: Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. Amer. Psych. 59, 2, 105--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kuznar, L. A. and Sedlmeyer, R. 2005. Collective violence in darfur: An agent-based model of pastoral nomad/sedentary peasant interaction. Math. Anthr. Cult. Theory: Int. J. 1, 4, 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lustick, I. S. and Miodownik, D. 2002. The institutionalization of identity: Micro adaptation, macro effects, and collective consequences. Studies Compar. Int. Devel. 37, 2, 24--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 16, 435--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Minar, N., Burkhardt, R., Langston, C., and Askanazi, M. 1996. The Swarm simulation system: A toolkit for building multi-agent simulations. Tech. rep., Sante Fe Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Monge, P. R. and Contractor, N. S. 2003. Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. North, M. J., Collier, N. T., and Vos, J. R. 2006. Experiences creating three implementations of the Repast Agent Modeling Toolkit. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 10, 2, 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ortner, S. B. 2003. New Jersey Dreaming: Capital, Culture, and the Class of '58. Duke, University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker, M. T. 2001. What is Ascape and why you should care? The J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 4, 1, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/1/5.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sallach, D. L. 2003. Social theory and agent architectures: prospective issues in rapid-discovery social science. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 21, 2, 175--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sallach, D. L. and Mellarkod, V. S. 2005. Typifying situations: Contextualizing and cohering action. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS'05). Notre Dame, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanil, A., Banks, D., and Carley, K. 1996. Models for evolving fixed node networks: Model fitting and model testing. J. Math. Sociol. 21, 1-2, 173--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarkar, P. and Moore, A. 2005. Dynamic social network analysis using latent space models. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sierhuis, M., Clancey, W. J., Seah, C., Trimble, J. P., and Sims, M. H. 2003. Modeling and simulation for mission operations work system design. J. Manag. Inform. Sys. 19, 4, 85--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Snijders, T. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In Sociological Methodology Dynamics, M. Sobel and M. Becker, Eds. Basil Blackwell, London, UK, 361--395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Somekh, B. and Lewin, C., Eds. 2005. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Van der Veen, A. M., Lustick, I. S., and Miodownik, D. 2001. Studying performance and learning with ABIR. Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 19, 3, 263--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Zuboff, S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine. Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ViSAGE: A Virtual Laboratory for Simulation and Analysis of Social Group Evolution

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!