Abstract
We present a modeling laboratory, Virtual Laboratory for the Simulation and Analysis of Social Group Evolution (ViSAGE), that views the organization of human communities and the experience of individuals in a community as contingent upon on the dynamic properties, or micro-laws, of social groups. The laboratory facilitates the theorization and validation of these properties through an iterative research processes that involves (1) forward simulation experiments, which are used to formalize dynamic group properties, (2) reverse engineering from real data on how the parameters are distributed among individual actors in the community, and (3) grounded research, such as participant observation, that follows specific activities of real actors in a community and determines if, or how well, the micro-laws describe the way choices are made in real world, local settings. In this article we report on the design of ViSAGE. We first give some background to the model. Next we detail each component. We then describe a set of simulation experiments that we used to further design and clarify ViSAGE as a tool for studying emergent properties/phenomena in social networks.
- Adamic, L. and Ader, E. 2003. Friends and neighbours on the web. Social Netw., 211--230.Google Scholar
- Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., and Lan, X. 2006. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 44--54. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Billari, F., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., and Scheffran, J., Eds. 2006. Agent-Based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bloor, D. 1999. Anti-latour. Studies Hist. Philos. Sci. 30, 1, 80--112.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., and Everett, M. G. 1998. Network measures of social capital. Connections 21, 2, 10.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Butler, B. S. 1999. The Dynamics of cyberspace: Examining and modelling online social structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. 2002. Interpreting Quantitative Data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Chattoe, E. 2002. Review: computational techniques for modelling learning in economics. J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 5, 1.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. 1994. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery science. Sociol. Forum 9, 2, 155--177.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Diwan, R. 2000. Relational wealth and the quality of life. J. Socio-Econ. 29, 305--340.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Epstein, J. M. 1999. Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4, 5, 41--60. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Epstein, J. M. and Axtell, R. 1996. Growing Artifical Societies: Social Science From the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Freeman, L. C. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver.Google Scholar
- Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., and Taskar, B. 2003. Learning probabilistic models of link structure. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 679--707. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Glasser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Reserach. Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, M., Horn, P., Magdon-Ismail, M., Riposo, J., Wallace, W., and Yener, B. 2003. Statistical modeling of social groups on communication networks. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science.Google Scholar
- Grimm, V. and Railsback, S. F. 2005. Individual-Based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton series in theoretical and computational biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Hoff, P., Raftery, A., and Handcock, M. 2002. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. Amer. Statis. Assoc., 1090--1098.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kadushin, C. 2004. Too much social capital? Soc. Netw. 26, 75--90.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kohler, T. A. and Gumerman, G. J. 2000. Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies: Agent-Based Modeling of Social and Spatial Processes. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Kohler, T. A., Johnson, D. C., Varien, M., Ortman, S., Reynolds, R., Kobti, Z., Cowan, J., Kolm, K., Smith, S., and Yap, L. 2007. Settlment ecodynamics in the prehispanic central mesa verde region. In The Model-Based Archaeology of Socionatural Systems, T. A. Kohler and S. E. van der Leeuw, Eds. SAR Press, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., and Couper, M. 2004. Psychological reserach online: Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. Amer. Psych. 59, 2, 105--117.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Kuznar, L. A. and Sedlmeyer, R. 2005. Collective violence in darfur: An agent-based model of pastoral nomad/sedentary peasant interaction. Math. Anthr. Cult. Theory: Int. J. 1, 4, 22.Google Scholar
- Lustick, I. S. and Miodownik, D. 2002. The institutionalization of identity: Micro adaptation, macro effects, and collective consequences. Studies Compar. Int. Devel. 37, 2, 24--53.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 16, 435--463.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Minar, N., Burkhardt, R., Langston, C., and Askanazi, M. 1996. The Swarm simulation system: A toolkit for building multi-agent simulations. Tech. rep., Sante Fe Institute.Google Scholar
- Monge, P. R. and Contractor, N. S. 2003. Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- North, M. J., Collier, N. T., and Vos, J. R. 2006. Experiences creating three implementations of the Repast Agent Modeling Toolkit. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 10, 2, 1--25. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ortner, S. B. 2003. New Jersey Dreaming: Capital, Culture, and the Class of '58. Duke, University Press.Google Scholar
- Parker, M. T. 2001. What is Ascape and why you should care? The J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 4, 1, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/1/5.html.Google Scholar
- Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24, 1--24.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Sallach, D. L. 2003. Social theory and agent architectures: prospective issues in rapid-discovery social science. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 21, 2, 175--195. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sallach, D. L. and Mellarkod, V. S. 2005. Typifying situations: Contextualizing and cohering action. In Proceedings of the North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS'05). Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
- Sanil, A., Banks, D., and Carley, K. 1996. Models for evolving fixed node networks: Model fitting and model testing. J. Math. Sociol. 21, 1-2, 173--196.Google Scholar
- Sarkar, P. and Moore, A. 2005. Dynamic social network analysis using latent space models. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 31--40. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Sierhuis, M., Clancey, W. J., Seah, C., Trimble, J. P., and Sims, M. H. 2003. Modeling and simulation for mission operations work system design. J. Manag. Inform. Sys. 19, 4, 85--128. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Snijders, T. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In Sociological Methodology Dynamics, M. Sobel and M. Becker, Eds. Basil Blackwell, London, UK, 361--395.Google Scholar
- Somekh, B. and Lewin, C., Eds. 2005. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Van der Veen, A. M., Lustick, I. S., and Miodownik, D. 2001. Studying performance and learning with ABIR. Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 19, 3, 263--280.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Zuboff, S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine. Heinemann.Google Scholar
Index Terms
ViSAGE: A Virtual Laboratory for Simulation and Analysis of Social Group Evolution
Recommendations
The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being
Using a two-wave panel in Hong Kong, this study examines how different uses of mobile social media contribute to individuals' social capital and psychological well-being. Findings showed that communicative use and self-disclosure on mobile social media ...
Seniors' loyalty to social network sites
Bonding social capital affects interpersonal and group attachment to SNSs.Bridging social capital highly influences interpersonal and group attachment.Group attachment is significantly influenced by interpersonal attachment to SNSs.Group attachment has ...
Does social capital affect SNS usage? A look at the roles of subjective well-being and social identity
Examines the effects of social capital on SNS use (qualitative and quantitative use).Found that bridging capital significantly impacts qualitative SNS use.Verified the mediating role of subjective well-being between bonding capital and quantitative SNS ...






Comments