skip to main content
10.1145/1383422.1383453acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshpdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Managing SLAs of heterogeneous workloads using dynamic application placement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we address the problem of managing heterogeneous workloads in a virtualized data center. We consider two different workloads: transactional applications and long-running jobs. We present a technique that permits collocation of these workload types on the same physical hardware. Our technique dynamically modifies workload placement by leveraging control mechanisms such as suspension and migration, and strives to optimally trade off resource allocation among these workloads in spite of their differing characteristics and performance objectives. Our approach builds upon our previous work on dynamically placing transactional workloads. This paper extends our framework with the capability to manage long-running workloads. We achieve this goal by using utility functions, which permit us to compare the performance of various workloads, and which are used to drive allocation decisions. We demonstrate that our technique maximizes heterogeneous workload performance while providing service differentiation based on high-level performance goals.

References

  1. D. Carrera, M. Steinder, I. Whalley, J. Torres, and E. Ayguadé. Managing SLAs of heterogeneous workloads using dynamic application placement. Technical Report RC 24469, IBM Research, Jan. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Carrera, M. Steinder, I. Whalley, J. Torres, and E. Ayguadé. Utility-based placement of dynamic web applications with fairness goals. In 11th IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS 2008), Salvador Bahia, Brazil, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. E. D. Jensen, C. D. Locke, and H. Tokuda. A time-driven scheduling model for real-time operating systems. In IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 112--122, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. B. Lee and A. E. Snavely. Precise and realistic utility functions for user-centric performance analysis of schedulers. In HPDC '07: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on High performance distributed computing, pages 107--116, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Steinder, I. Whalley, D. Carrera, I. Gaweda, and D. Chess. Server virtualization in autonomic management of heterogeneous workloads. In 10th IEEE/IFIP Symposium on Integrated Management (IM 2007), Munich, Germany, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sun Microsystems. Behavior of mixed workloads consolidated using Solaris Resource Manager software. Technical report, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Managing SLAs of heterogeneous workloads using dynamic application placement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HPDC '08: Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on High performance distributed computing
      June 2008
      252 pages
      ISBN:9781595939975
      DOI:10.1145/1383422

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate166of966submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader