skip to main content
column

Distributed quantum computing: a new frontier in distributed systems or science fiction?

Published: 01 September 2008 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Quantum computing and distributed systems may enter a mutually beneficial partnership in the future. On the one hand, it is much easier to build a number of small quantum computers rather than a single large one. On the other hand, the best results concerning some of the fundamental problems in distributed computing can potentially be dramatically improved upon by taking advantage of the superior resources and processing power that quantum mechanics offers. This survey has the purpose to highlight both of these benefits. We first review the current results regarding the implementation of arbitrary quantum algorithms on distributed hardware. We then discuss existing proposals for quantum solutions of leader election - a fundamental problem from distributed computing. Quantum mechanics allows leader election to be solved with no communication, provided that certain pre-shared entanglement is already in place. Further, an impossibility result from classical distributed computing is circumvented by the quantum solution of anonymous leader election - a unique leader is elected in finite time with certainty. Finally, we discuss the viability of these proposals from a practical perspective. Although, theoretically, distributed quantum computing looks promising, it is still unclear how to build quantum hardware and how to create and maintain robust large-scale entangled states. Moreover, it is not clear whether the costs of creating entangled states and working with them are smaller than the costs of existing classical solutions.

    References

    [1]
    Bell, J. S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1 (1964), 195--200.
    [2]
    Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., and Wootters, W. K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Physical Review A 54, 5 (Nov 1996), 3824--3851.
    [3]
    Bennett, C. H., Popescu, S., Rohrlich, D., Smolin, J. A., and Thapliyal, A. V. Exact and asymptotic measures of multipartite pure-state entanglement. Physical Review A 63, 1 (Dec 2000), 012307.
    [4]
    Brassard, G., Hoyer, P., Mosca, M., and Tapp, A. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation, 2000, quant-ph/0005055.
    [5]
    Cubitt, T. S., Verstraete, F., Dür, W., and Cirac, J. I. Separable states can be used to distribute entanglement. Physical Review Letters 91, 3 (Jul 2003), 037902.
    [6]
    D'Hondt, E. Distributed quantum computation: a measurement-based approach. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2005.
    [7]
    D'Hondt, E., and Panangaden, P. The Computational Power of the W and GHZ states. Quantum Information and Computation 6, 2 (2006), 173--183.
    [8]
    Dur, W., Vidal, G., and Cirac, J. I. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Physical Review A 62 (2000), 062314.
    [9]
    Eberhard, P. H. Bell's theorem and the different concepts of locality. Nuovo Cimento 46B (1978), 392--419. LBL-7537.
    [10]
    Eck, M., Wocjan, P., and Beth, T. Design and implementation of a simulator for quantum circuits. Tech. rep., University of Karlsruhe, Department of Informatics, Institute for Algorithms and Cognitive Systems, 2000.
    [11]
    Eibl, M., Gaertner, S., Bourennane, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Żukowski, M., andWeinfurter, H. Experimental observation of four-photon entanglement from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 20 (May 2003), 200403.
    [12]
    Einstein, A. Relativity: the special and general theory. Methuen and Co Ltd, 1916.
    [13]
    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 10 (May 1935), 777--780.
    [14]
    Eisert, J., Jacobs, K., Papadopoulos, P., and Plenio, M. B. Optimal local implementation of non-local quantum gates. Physical Review A 62 (2000), 052317.
    [15]
    Ekert, A., and Jozsa, R. Quantum algorithms: Entanglement enhanced information processing. ArXiv Quantum Physics e-prints (1998), quant-ph/9803072.
    [16]
    Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., and Zeilinger, A. Bell's theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe. Kluwer Academic Press, 1989, ch. Going beyond Bell's theorem, pp. 73--76.
    [17]
    Grover, L. K. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In STOC (1996), pp. 212--219.
    [18]
    Jozsa, R. Entanglement and quantum computation. In The Geometric Universe, S. Huggett, L. Mason, K. P. Tod, S. T. Tsou, and N. Woodhouse, Eds. Oxford University Press, January 1998.
    [19]
    Jozsa, R., and Linden, N. On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up. Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A 459 (Aug. 2003), 2011--2032.
    [20]
    Linden, N., and Popescu, S. Good dynamics versus bad kinematics. Is entanglement needed for quantum computation? Physical Review Letters 87 (2001), 047901.
    [21]
    Lynch, N. Distributed algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1997.
    [22]
    Meter III, R. D. V. Architecture of a Quantum Multicomputer Optimized for Shor's Factoring Algorithm. PhD thesis, Keio University, 2006, quant-ph/0607065.
    [23]
    Mikami, H., Li, Y., and Kobayashi, T. Generation of the four-photon W state and other multiphoton entangled states using parametric down-conversion. Physical Review A 70, 5 (Nov. 2004), 052308.
    [24]
    Nielsen, M., and Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Informaiton. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    [25]
    Pal, S. P., Singh, S. K., and Kumar, S. Multi-partite Quantum Entanglement versus Randomization: Fair and Unbiased Leader Election in Networks. ArXiv Quantum Physics e-prints (June 2003), quantph/ 0306195.
    [26]
    Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H., and Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: Entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 18 (May 1998), 3891--3894.
    [27]
    Shimony, A. Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1984), S. Kamefuchi, Ed., The Physical Society of Japan.
    [28]
    Shor, P. W. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal on Computing 26, 5 (1997), 1484--1509.
    [29]
    Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., and Pal, S. P. Characterizing the combinatorics of distributed EPR pairs for multi-partite entanglement. ArXiv Quantum Physics e-prints (June 2003), quant-ph/0306049.
    [30]
    Tani, S. A study on algorithms for efficient multi-point communication in autonomous distributed networks. PhD thesis, University of Tokyo, 2006.
    [31]
    Tani, S., Kobayashi, H., and Matsumoto, K. Exact quantum algorithms for the leader election problem. In Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science Proceedings (2005), V. Diekert and B. Durand, Eds., vol. 3404 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 581--592.
    [32]
    Tani, S., Kobayashi, H., and Matsumoto, K. Quantum leader election via exact amplitude amplification. In Proceedings of ERATO conference on Quantum Information Science (2005), pp. 11--12.
    [33]
    Tel, G. Introduction to distributed algorithms. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    [34]
    Weinfurter, H., and Żukowski, M. Four-photon entanglement from down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 64, 1 (Jun 2001), 010102.
    [35]
    Yimsiriwattana, A., and Lomonaco, Jr., S. J. Distributed quantum computing: a distributed Shor algorithm. In Quantum Information and Computation II (Aug. 2004), E. Donkor, A. R. Pirich, and H. E. Brandt, Eds., vol. 5436 of Proceedings of Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers Conference, pp. 360--372.
    [36]
    Yimsiriwattana, A., and Lomonaco, Jr., S. J. Generalized GHZ States and Distributed Quantum Computing. ArXiv Quantum Physics e-prints (Feb. 2004), quant-ph/0402148.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)On the Power of Quantum Distributed ProofsProceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3662158.3662788(220-230)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Efficient Remote Entanglement Distribution in Quantum Networks: A Segment-Based MethodIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2023.329667221:1(249-265)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Concurrent Entanglement Routing for Quantum Networks: Model and DesignsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.334374832:3(2205-2220)Online publication date: Jun-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGACT News
    ACM SIGACT News  Volume 39, Issue 3
    September 2008
    113 pages
    ISSN:0163-5700
    DOI:10.1145/1412700
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2008
    Published in SIGACT Volume 39, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Column

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)135
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)On the Power of Quantum Distributed ProofsProceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3662158.3662788(220-230)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Efficient Remote Entanglement Distribution in Quantum Networks: A Segment-Based MethodIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2023.329667221:1(249-265)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Concurrent Entanglement Routing for Quantum Networks: Model and DesignsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.334374832:3(2205-2220)Online publication date: Jun-2024
    • (2024)Near-term distributed quantum computation using mean-field corrections and auxiliary qubitsQuantum Science and Technology10.1088/2058-9565/ad3f459:3(035022)Online publication date: 3-May-2024
    • (2024)End-to-end entanglement establishment with lower latency in quantum networksQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-023-04241-523:2Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Exact distributed quantum algorithm for generalized Simon’s problemActa Informatica10.1007/s00236-024-00455-x61:2(131-159)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Discrete‐Modulated Continuous‐Variable Quantum Key Distribution in Satellite‐to‐Ground CommunicationAdvanced Quantum Technologies10.1002/qute.202400140Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
    • (2023)The Min-Entropy of Classical-Quantum Combs for Measurement-Based ApplicationsQuantum10.22331/q-2023-12-12-12067(1206)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
    • (2023)QUANT-NET: A testbed for quantum networking research over deployed fiberProceedings of the 1st Workshop on Quantum Networks and Distributed Quantum Computing10.1145/3610251.3610561(31-37)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Distributed Transport Protocols for Quantum Data NetworksIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.326254731:6(2777-2792)Online publication date: Dec-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media