
- S. Hill and F. Provost. The myth of the double-blind review?: Author identification using only citations. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 5(2):179--184, 2003. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D.N. Laband and M.J. Piette. Citation analysis of blinded peer review. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA): The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, 272(2):147--149, July 1994Google Scholar
- R.T. Snodgrass. Single-versus double-blind reviewing: An analysis of the literature. ACM SIGMOD Record, 35(3):8--21, 2006. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R.T. Snodgrass. Editorial: Single-versus double-blind reviewing reviewing. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 32(1):1--31, 2007. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- R.T. Snodgrass. Frequently asked questions about double-blind reviewing. ACM SIGMOD Record, 36(1):60--62, 2007. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A.K.H. Tung. Impact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication: A more detailed analysis. ACM SIGMOD Record, 35(3):6--7, 2006. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- D. Watson, A.C. Andersen, and J. Hjorth. Mysterious disappearance of female investigators. Nature, 436(7048):174, July 2005.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Wenneras and A. Wold. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387(6631):341--343, May 1997.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
Index Terms
Improving publication quality by reducing bias with double-blind reviewing and author response
Recommendations
Double-blind reviewing: more placebo than miracle cure?
In double-blind reviewing (DBR), both reviewers and authors are unaware of each others' identities and affiliations. DBR is said to increase review fairness. However, DBR may only be marginally effective in combating the randomness of the typical ...
Impact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication rates
Starting with the 2001 SIGMOD conference, the SIGMOD Chair, in consultation with the SIGMOD Advisory Committee, imposed a double blind rule on all future SIGMOD conferences. While there are many reasons why double-blind reviewing might be a good idea, ...






Comments