Abstract
For several decades universities have taught programming languages as a fundamental part of their un-dergraduate curriculum. These courses cover the core topics used in the design of good programming languages. However, widely used commercial languages quite often seem to go against the conventional wisdom of good language design that is taught in these courses. This disconnect between what is taught as good language design and what languages are used in industry has put the programming language course in a bind. Specifically, as computer science departments feel the increased pressure to add new emerging topics, many departments are choosing to remove the programming language course from the core curriculum. In this position paper, we argue that the disconnect between good language design and industry practice is exactly why a programming language course should be a crucial ingredient in any undergraduate computer science education.
Index Terms
Addressing the disconnect between the good and the popular
Recommendations
Rethinking pedagogy for teaching PL with more than PL concepts in mind
Individual department goals drive undergraduate computer science educators to teach with varying priorities on preparing students for continuing to graduate school or embarking on a career that leverages their education immediately after college. ...
An aspect-oriented approach to the undergraduate programming language curriculum
Three key forces are shaping the modern Computer Science (CS) curriculum: (1) new topics/courses are squeezing out existing ones; (2) a focus on "big picture" and interdisciplinary aspects of CS is leading to curricula in which the traditional core ...
Programming languages in a liberal arts education
Liberal arts curricula emphasize breadth of a student's educational experience, critical reasoning, and intellectual discourse to a greater degree than pre-professional training or engineering programs. This substantially impacts how the topic of ...






Comments