An empirical BSSRDF model

Abstract

We present a new model of the homogeneous BSSRDF based on large-scale simulations. Our model captures the appearance of materials that are not accurately represented using existing single scattering models or multiple isotropic scattering models (e.g. the diffusion approximation). We use an analytic function to model the 2D hemispherical distribution of exitant light at a point on the surface, and a table of parameter values of this function computed at uniformly sampled locations over the remaining dimensions of the BSSRDF domain. This analytic function is expressed in elliptic coordinates and has six parameters which vary smoothly with surface position, incident angle, and the underlying optical properties of the material (albedo, mean free path length, phase function and the relative index of refraction). Our model agrees well with measured data, and is compact, requiring only 250MB to represent the full spatial- and angular-distribution of light across a wide spectrum of materials. In practice, rendering a single material requires only about 100KB to represent the BSSRDF.

References

1. Blinn, J. F. 1982. Light reflection functions for simulation of clouds and dusty surfaces. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 82), vol. 16, 21--29.
2. Bouthors, A., Neyret, F., Max, N., Bruneton, E., and Crassin, C. 2008. Interactive multiple anisotropic scattering in clouds. In I3D '08: Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, 173--182.
3. Cerezo, E., Perez-Cazorla, F., Pueyo, X., Seron, F., and Sillion, F. 2005. A survey on participating media rendering techniques. The Visual Computer.
4. Dana, K., Ginneken, B., Nayar, S., and Koenderink, J. 1999. Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces. ACM Trans. Graphic. 18, 1, 1--34.
5. Donner, C., and Jensen, H. W. 2005. Light diffusion in multi-layered translucent materials. ACM Trans. Graphic. 24, 3, 1032--1039.
6. Donner, C., and Jensen, H. W. 2007. Rendering translucent materials using photon diffusion. In Rendering Techniques, 243--251.
7. Goesele, M., Lensch, H. P. A., Lang, J., Fuchs, C., and Siedel, H.-P. 2004. DISCO: aquisition of translucent objects. ACM Trans. Graphic. 23, 3, 835--844.
8. Hanrahan, P., and Krueger, W. 1993. Reflection from layered surfaces due to subsurface scattering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1993, 164--174.
9. Jensen, H. W., and Buhler, J. 2002. A rapid hierarchical rendering technique for translucent materials. ACM Trans. Graphic. 21, 576--581.
10. Jensen, H. W., Legakis, J., and Dorsey, J. 1999. Rendering of wet materials. In Rendering Techniques, 273--282.
11. Jensen, H. W., Marschner, S. R., Levoy, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2001. A practical model for subsurface light transport. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 511--518.
12. Jensen, H. W. 1996. Global illumination using photon maps. In Rendering Techniques, 21--30.
13. Jensen, H. W. 2001. Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping. AK Peters.
14. Joshi, N., Donner, C., and Jensen, H. W. 2006. Noninvasive measurement of scattering anisotropy in turbid materials by nonnormal incident illumination. Opt. Lett. 31, 936--938.
15. Kajiya, J. T. 1986. The rendering equation. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 86), 143--150.
16. Korn, G. A., and Korn, T. M. 2000. Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers: Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review. Courier Dover Publications.
17. Li, H., Pellacini, F., and Torrance, K. 2005. A hybrid monte carlo method for accurate and efficient subsurface scattering. In Rendering Techniques, 283--290.
18. Matusik, W., Pfister, H., Brand, M., and McMillan, L. 2003. A data-driven reflectance model. ACM Trans. Graphic. 22, 3, 759--769.
19. Narasimhan, S. G., Gupta, M., Donner, C., Ramamoorthi, R., Nayar, S., and Jensen, H. W. 2006. Acquiring scattering properties of participating media by dilution. ACM Trans. Graphic. 25, 1003--1012.
20. Nicodemus, F. E., Richmond, J. C., Hsia, J. J., Ginsberg, I. W., and Limperis, T. 1977. Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance. National Bureau of Standards.
21. Peers, P., Vom Berge, K., Matusik, W., Ramamoorthi, R., Lawrence, J., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Dutré, P. 2006. A compact factored representation of heterogeneous subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graphic. 25, 3, 746--753.
22. Pharr, M., and Hanrahan, P. 2000. Monte carlo evaluation of non-linear scattering equations for subsurface reflection. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 75--84.
23. Premože, S., Ashikhmin, M., and Shirley, P. 2003. Path integration for light transport in volumes. In Rendering Techniqes, 52--63.
24. Premoze, S., Ashikhmin, M., Tessendorf, J., Ramamoorthi, R., and Nayar, S. 2004. Practical rendering of multiple scattering effects in participating media. In Rendering Techniques, 363--374.
25. Stam, J. 1995. Multiple scattering as a diffusion process. In Rendering Techniques, 41--50.
26. Tong, X., Wang, J., Lin, S., Guo, B., and Shum, H.-Y. 2005. Modeling and rendering of quasi-homogeneous materials. ACM Trans. Graphic. 24, 3, 1054--1061.
27. Ward, G. J. 1992. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 92), 265--272.
28. Westin, S. H., Arvo, J. R., and Torrance, K. E. 1992. Predicting reflectance functions from complex surfaces. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 92), 255--264.
29. Zhang, Z. 1999. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 11, 1330--1334.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Computer vision

      • Image and video acquisition

        • 3D imaging

  • Computer graphics

    • Animation

    • Shape modeling

  • Modeling and simulation

    • Model development and analysis

      • Modeling methodologies

• Theory of computation

  • Randomness, geometry and discrete structures

    • Computational geometry