10.1145/1541948.1542006acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespersuasiveConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A theory-based framework for evaluating exergames as persuasive technology

Published:26 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Exergames are video games that use exertion-based interfaces to promote physical activity, fitness, and gross motor skill development. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of an organizing framework based on principles of learning theory to classify and rank exergames according to embedded behavior change principles. Behavioral contingencies represent a key theory-based game design principle that can be objectively measured, evaluated, and manipulated to help explain and change the frequency and duration of game play. Case examples are presented that demonstrate how to code dimensions of behavior, consequences of behavior, and antecedents of behavior. Our framework may be used to identify game principles which, in the future, might be used to predict which games are most likely to promote adoption and maintenance of leisure time physical activity.

References

  1. Anders, M. 2008. As good as the real thing? ACE FitnessMatters. 14, 4 (July/Aug. 2008), 7--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranowski, T., Buday, R., Thompson, D. I., Baranowski, J., 2008. Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am. J. Prev. Med. 34, 1(Jan. 2008), 74--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults: United States, 2001 and 2005. 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56, 1209--1212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chance, P. 1999. Learning and Behavior 4th edition. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., Heward, W. L. 2006. Applied Behavior Analysis. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferster, C. B., Skinner, B. F. 1957. Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogg, B. J. 2003. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hursh, S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. 1980. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanningham-Foster, L., Jensen, T. B., Foster, R. C., Redmond, A. B., Walker, B. A., Heinz, D., et al. Energy expenditure of sedentary screen time compared with active screen time for children. Pediatrics, 118, 6 (Dec. 2006), e1831-e1835.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mellecker, R. R., McManus, A. M. Energy expenditure and cardiovascular responses to seated and active gaming in children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 162, 9 (Sept. 2008), 886--896.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan B., Aziz, A. R., Chua, K., The, K. C. 2002. Aerobic demands of the dance simulation game. Int. J. Sports. Med. 23, 2 (Feb. 2002), 125--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Troiano, R., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K., Mâsse, L., Tilert, T., McDowell, M. 2008. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sport. Exer. 40, 1 (Jan. 2008), 181--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A theory-based framework for evaluating exergames as persuasive technology

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        Persuasive '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology
        April 2009
        279 pages
        ISBN:9781605583761
        DOI:10.1145/1541948

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Persuasive '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 66 submissions, 32%Overall Acceptance Rate 32 of 137 submissions, 23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!