skip to main content
10.1145/1556262.1556270acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Zooming, multiple windows, and visual working memory

Published:22 May 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Zooming and multiple windows are two techniques designed to address the focus-in-context problem. We present a theoretical model of performance that models the relative benefits of these techniques when used by humans for completing a task involving comparisons between widely separated groups of objects. The crux of the model is its cognitive component: the strength of multiple windows comes in the way they aid visual working memory. The task to which we apply our model is multiscale comparison, in which a user begins with a known visual pattern and searches for an identical or similar pattern among distracters. The model predicts that zooming should be better for navigating between a few distant locations when demands on visual memory are low, but that multiple windows are more efficient when demands on visual memory are higher, or there are several distant locations that must be investigated. To evaluate our model we conducted an experiment in which users performed a multiscale comparison task using both zooming and multiple-window interfaces. The results confirm the general predictions of our model.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 8, New York, Academic Press, 1974, pp. 47--89Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. D, N. Thompson, and M. Buchanan. Word Length and the Structure of Short-Term Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 1975, pp. 575--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bederson, B. B. and Hollan, J. D. Pad++: A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '94), ACM Press, New York, 1994, pp. 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Combs, T. T. A. and Bederson, B. B. Does Zooming Improve Image Browsing? Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM Press, New York, 1999, pp. 130--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Guo, H., V. Zhang, and J. Wu. The Effect of Zooming Speed in a Zoomable User Interface. Student CHI Online Research Experiments (SHORE), http://otal.umd.edu/SHORE2000/zoom/, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang, Y., I. R. Olson, and M. M. Chun. Organization of Visual Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 2000, pp. 683--702.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kandogan, E. and Shneiderman, B. Elastic Windows: Evaluation of Multi-Window Operations. CHI '97 Proceedings, Atlanta, ACM Press/Addison Wesley, New York, 1997, pp. 250--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Miller, G. A. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63, 1956, pp. 81--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyake, A. and Shah, P. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. North, C., and Shneiderman, B. Snap-Together Visualization: A User Interface for Coordinating Visualizations via Relational Schemata. Proceedings of AVI 2000, Palermo, Italy, May 2000, pp 128--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Phillips, W. A. On the Distinction Between Sensory Storage and Short-Term Visual Memory. Perception&Psychophysics, 16, 1974, pp. 283--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Plaisant, C., D. Carr, and H. Hasegawa. When an Intermediate View Matters: A 2D Browser Experiment. University of Maryland Technical Report CS-TR-2980, http://www.cs.umd.edu/Library/TRs/CS-TR-2980/CS-TR-2980.ps.Z, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schaffer, D., Z. Zuo, S. Greenberg, L. Bartram, J. Dill, S. Dubs, and M. Roseman. Navigating Hierarchically Clustered Networks Through Fisheye and Full-Zoom Methods. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2), June 1996, pp. 162--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vogel, E. K., G. F. Woodman, and S. J. Luck. Storage of Features, Conjunctions, and Objects in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 2001, pp. 92--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Wang Baldonado, M. Q., A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky. Guidelines for Using Multiple Views in Information Visualization. Proceedings of AVI 2000, Palermo, Italy, May 2000, pp 110--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Zooming, multiple windows, and visual working memory

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AVI '02: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
            May 2002
            382 pages
            ISBN:1581135378
            DOI:10.1145/1556262

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 22 May 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader