ABSTRACT
Zooming and multiple windows are two techniques designed to address the focus-in-context problem. We present a theoretical model of performance that models the relative benefits of these techniques when used by humans for completing a task involving comparisons between widely separated groups of objects. The crux of the model is its cognitive component: the strength of multiple windows comes in the way they aid visual working memory. The task to which we apply our model is multiscale comparison, in which a user begins with a known visual pattern and searches for an identical or similar pattern among distracters. The model predicts that zooming should be better for navigating between a few distant locations when demands on visual memory are low, but that multiple windows are more efficient when demands on visual memory are higher, or there are several distant locations that must be investigated. To evaluate our model we conducted an experiment in which users performed a multiscale comparison task using both zooming and multiple-window interfaces. The results confirm the general predictions of our model.
- Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 8, New York, Academic Press, 1974, pp. 47--89Google Scholar
- Baddeley, A. D, N. Thompson, and M. Buchanan. Word Length and the Structure of Short-Term Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 1975, pp. 575--589.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bederson, B. B. and Hollan, J. D. Pad++: A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '94), ACM Press, New York, 1994, pp. 17--26. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Combs, T. T. A. and Bederson, B. B. Does Zooming Improve Image Browsing? Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM Press, New York, 1999, pp. 130--137. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Guo, H., V. Zhang, and J. Wu. The Effect of Zooming Speed in a Zoomable User Interface. Student CHI Online Research Experiments (SHORE), http://otal.umd.edu/SHORE2000/zoom/, 2000.Google Scholar
- Jiang, Y., I. R. Olson, and M. M. Chun. Organization of Visual Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 2000, pp. 683--702.Google Scholar
- Kandogan, E. and Shneiderman, B. Elastic Windows: Evaluation of Multi-Window Operations. CHI '97 Proceedings, Atlanta, ACM Press/Addison Wesley, New York, 1997, pp. 250--257. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Miller, G. A. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63, 1956, pp. 81--97.Google Scholar
- Miyake, A. and Shah, P. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- North, C., and Shneiderman, B. Snap-Together Visualization: A User Interface for Coordinating Visualizations via Relational Schemata. Proceedings of AVI 2000, Palermo, Italy, May 2000, pp 128--135. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Phillips, W. A. On the Distinction Between Sensory Storage and Short-Term Visual Memory. Perception&Psychophysics, 16, 1974, pp. 283--290.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Plaisant, C., D. Carr, and H. Hasegawa. When an Intermediate View Matters: A 2D Browser Experiment. University of Maryland Technical Report CS-TR-2980, http://www.cs.umd.edu/Library/TRs/CS-TR-2980/CS-TR-2980.ps.Z, 1992.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, D., Z. Zuo, S. Greenberg, L. Bartram, J. Dill, S. Dubs, and M. Roseman. Navigating Hierarchically Clustered Networks Through Fisheye and Full-Zoom Methods. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2), June 1996, pp. 162--199. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Vogel, E. K., G. F. Woodman, and S. J. Luck. Storage of Features, Conjunctions, and Objects in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 2001, pp. 92--114.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wang Baldonado, M. Q., A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky. Guidelines for Using Multiple Views in Information Visualization. Proceedings of AVI 2000, Palermo, Italy, May 2000, pp 110--119. Google Scholar
Digital Library
Index Terms
Zooming, multiple windows, and visual working memory
Recommendations
Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive costs of visual comparisons
In order to investigate large information spaces effectively, it is often necessary to employ navigation mechanisms that allow users to view information at different scales. Some tasks require frequent movements and scale changes to search for details ...
Working Memory for Visual and Haptic Targets: A Study Using the Interference Paradigm
EuroHaptics '08: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Haptics: Perception, Devices and ScenariosWe investigated the effect of different types of interference in visual and haptic working memory using a dual-task paradigm. At encoding, 16 young adults performed both, a haptic and a visual primary task followed by the performance of a secondary ...
Does (multi-)touch aid users' spatial memory and navigation in 'panning' and in 'zooming & panning' UIs?
AVI '12: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual InterfacesRecent findings from Embodied Cognition reveal strong effects of arm and hand movement on spatial memory. This suggests that input devices may have a far greater influence on users' cognition and users' ability to master a system than we typically ...





Comments