Susan Elizabeth Ryan
ABSTRACT
This paper elucidates two positions (the positivist and the critical) that inform the creative design of technological fashion. On the one side is the instrumentalist trend toward the minimized or disappearing interface. On the other, some theorists and artists suggest that increased invisibility presents social and ethical concerns (such as invasiveness and control) when networking and communication devices are involved.
The positivist side has roots in modernist design. Positivist designers create responsive and controllable fabrics using shape-changing polymers, e-textiles, and nano-scale electronics to resolve clumsy and prohibitive problems of hardware vs. body. The critical side draws upon archetypal ideas about technology and the body that are familiar from literature and science fiction, and includes writers and media artists who emphasize the intractable or mechanic nature of technological clothing to enhance, rather than erase, the body. The paper concludes that both positions must be considered as the field of technological fashion moves forward.
Supplemental Material
- William Gibson, Neuromancer (New York: Ace Books, 2000) 66--67, original publication 1984.Google Scholar
- http://www.design.philips.com/probes/projects/dresses/index.page, and http://news.softpedia.com/news/Flammable-Ego-Philips-lights-Up-Your-Inner-Self-74355.shtml.Google Scholar
- http://www.primidi.com/2008/10/15.html.Google Scholar
- http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/May07/nanofibers.fashion.aj.html.Google Scholar
- Smart Second Skin Dress: http://www.smartsecondskin.com/main/scentsorydesign.htm.Google Scholar
- Gilles Lipovetsky, The Empire of Fashion: Dressing Modern Democracy, trans. Catherine Porter (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994) 264.Google Scholar
- Bernadette Wegenstein, Getting Under the Skin: The Body and Media Theory (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006) 12--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lipovetsky, The Empire of Fashion, 131.Google Scholar
- Berzowska, "Electronic Textiles: Wearable Computers, Reactive Fashion, and Soft Computation," Textile, Vol. 3, No. 1, 16 (2005).Google Scholar
- Susan Elizabeth Ryan, "A Virtual Interview With Geert Lovink," Intelligent Agent, Vol. 8, No. 1 (2008).Google Scholar
- Gilles Deleuze, "Postscript on Societies of Control" (October 1988), reprinted in The Cybercities Reader, ed. Stephen Graham (London: Routledge, 2004) 73--77.Google Scholar
- Peter Galloway, The Exploit (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2007) 78.Google Scholar
- Andraž Petrovčič, "Reconfiguring Socialities: The Personal Networks of ICT Users and Social Cohesion," tripleC, Vol. 6, No. 2, 163 (2008).Google Scholar
Index Terms
Re-visioning the interface: technological fashion as critical media
Recommendations
(Un)dressing the interface: Exposing the foundational HCI metaphor "computer is woman"
Two fundamental (and oftentimes opposing) metaphors have directed much of HCI design: HCI is communication and HCI is direct manipulation. Beneath these HCI metaphors, however, is the unspoken metaphor of computer is woman. In this paper we expose this ...
The Paranoid Interface
This paper explores the rise of paranoid perception. It reasons that in recent years, a distinctly paranoid and conspiratorial understanding of reality has emerged in mainstream society, one that brings opportunities and implications for mixed, ...
Politics at the interface: a Foucauldian power analysis
At the birth of participatory design, there was a strong political consciousness surrounding the design of new technology, the design process in particular, establishing a rich set of methods and tools for user-centered design. Today, the term design ...
Comments