Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems

ABSTRACT

The sources of lag (the delay between input action and output response) and its effects on human performance are discussed. We measured the effects in a study of target acquisition using the classic Fitts' law paradigm with the addition of four lag conditions. At the highest lag tested (225 ms), movement times and error rates increased by 64% and 214% respectively, compared to the zero lag condition. We propose a model according to which lag should have a multiplicative effect on Fitts' index of difficulty. The model accounts for 94% of the variance and is better than alternative models which propose only an additive effect for lag. The implications for the design of virtual reality systems are discussed.

References

1. 1.Brooks, F. P., Jr., Ouh-Young, M., Butter, J. J., & Kilpatrick, P. J. (1990). Project GROPE: Haptic displays for scientific visualization. Computer Graphics, 24(4), 177-185.
2. 2.Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Robertson, G. G. (1991). A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 9, 99-122.
3. 3.Card, S. K., Robertson, G. G., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1991). The information visualizer, an information workspace. Proceedings of the CHI '91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 181-188). New York: ACM.
4. 4.Dafoe, C. (1992, September 5). The next best thing to being there. The Globe and Mail, pp. C1, C5.
5. 5.Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
6. 6.Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., & Hughes, J. F. (1990). Computer graphics: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
7. 7.Gibbs, C. B. (1962). Controller design: Interaction of controlling limbs, time-lags, and gains in positional and velocity systems. Ergonomics, 5, 385-402.
8. 8.Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. 9.Liang, J., Shaw, C., & Green, M. (1991). On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual reality environment. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH and SIGCHI Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology- U1ST '91 (pp. 19-25). New York: ACM.
10. 10.MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human- Computer Interaction, 7, 91-139.
11. 11.MacKenzie, I. S., & Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. Proceedings ofthe CH1 '92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 219-226). New York: ACM.
12. 12.MacKenzie, I. S., Sellen, A., & Buxton, W. (1991). A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Proceedings of the CHI '91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 161-167). New York: ACM.
13. 13.Pausch, R. (1991). Virtual reality on five dollars a day. Proceedings of the CHI '91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 265-269). New York: ACM.
14. 14.Sheridan, T. B., & Ferrell, W. R. (1968). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. 1EEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 4, 25- 29.
15. 15.Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals ofskill. London: Methuen.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

      • Virtual reality

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Mixed / augmented reality

      • Virtual reality