
- Birnbaum, A. (1968) Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability, in F.M. Lord, & M.R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory : Principles and Applications. Boston Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lawley, D. N. (1943) On problems connected with item selection and test construction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 6, 273-287.Google Scholar
- Lawley, D. N. (1944) The factorial analysis of multiple item tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 62-A, 74-82.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lord, F. M. (1952) A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph, 7.Google Scholar
- Lord, F. M. (1953) The relation of test score to the trait underlying the test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 517-548.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Raseh, G. (1960) Probabitistic Models for some Intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Roberts, F. C. & Park, O. (1983) intelligent computer-. assisted instruction: An explanation and overview. Educational Technology, 23, 7-12.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute, Inc. (1985) SAS user's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- Syang, A. A., (1992) A QUANTITATIVE STUDENT MODEL FOR INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS: STUDENT PROGRAMMING ABILITY, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Wainer & Kiely, (1987) Item clusters and computer adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Wright, B. D., Rossner, M., & Congdon, R. T. (1987) A User's Guide to MSTEPS: Computer Program and Users' Guide, Version 2.0, Department of Education, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Index Terms
Computerized adaptive testing in computer science: assessing student programming abilities






Comments