skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1754199acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Best of both worlds: improving gmail labels with the affordances of folders

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gmail's filing system for email conversations is based around labels, which are more flexible and powerful than folders. With its original user interface, many users did not discover labels, and wondered why Gmail had no folders. The Gmail team redesigned the user interface for labeling to make it more discoverable and understandable, and to add the most useful functionality of folders. The new design works for the simple use case (a conversation with only one label), while still making the more complex use case (multiple labels) easily available. It has been launched to millions of users worldwide and has resulted in much higher adoption of labels, especially by new users of Gmail.

References

  1. Akers, D., Simpson, M., Jeffries, R., and Winograd, T. Undo and erase events as indicators of usability problems. Proc. CHI'09, ACM, 2009, pp. 659--668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bälter, O. Keystroke level analysis of email message organization. Proc. CHI'00, ACM, 2000, pp. 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Civan, A., Jones, W., Klasnja, P., and Bruce, H. Better to organize personal information by folders or by tags?: The devil is in the details. Proc. ASIS&T Annual Meeting, Wiley, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dabbish, L.A., and Kraut, R.E. Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. Proc. CSCW'06, ACM, 2006, pp. 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dabbish, L.A., Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S., and Kiesler, S. Understanding email use: Predicting action on a message. Proc. CHI'05, ACM, 2005, pp. 691--700. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eklund, E.A. New ways to label with "move to" and auto-complete. Official Gmail Blog, February 2009. http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-ways-to-label-with-move-to-and-auto.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gajda, D. Labels: Drag and drop, hiding, and more. Official Gmail Blog, July 2009. http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/labels-drag-and-drop-hiding-and-more.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gmail. http://mail.google.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leggett, M. The evolution of Gmail labels. Official Google Blog, July 2009. http://googleblog.blogspot.com /2009/07/evolution-of-gmail-labels.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mackay, W. Diversity in the use of electronic mail: A preliminary inquiry. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1988), pp. 380--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tang, J.C., Wilcox, E., Cerruti, J.A., Badenes, H., Schoudt, J., and Nusser, S. Tag-it, snag-it, or bag-it: Combining tags, threads, and folders in e-mail. Ext. Abstracts of CHI 2008, ACM, 2008, pp. 2179--2194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Venolia, G., Dabbish, L., Cadiz, J.J., & Gupta, A. Supporting email workflow. MSR Tech Report, MSR-TR-2001-88, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Whittaker, S. and Sidner, C. Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proc. CHI'96, ACM, 1996, pp. 276--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Best of both worlds: improving gmail labels with the affordances of folders

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader