10.1145/1836135.1836143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedings
research-article

Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games

Published:28 July 2010

ABSTRACT

Psychophysiological methods are becoming more popular in game research as covert and reliable measures of affective player experience, emotions, and cognition. Since player experience is not well understood, correlations between self-reports from players and psychophysiological data may provide a quantitative understanding of this experience. Measurements of electrodermal activity (EDA) and heart rate (HR) allow making inferences about player arousal (i.e., excitement) and are easy to deploy. This paper reports a case study on HR and EDA correlations with subjective gameplay experience, testing the feasibility of these measures in commercial game development contexts. Results indicate a significant correlation (p < 0.01) between psychophysiological arousal (i.e., HR, EDA) and self-reported gameplay experience. However, the covariance between psychophysiological measures and self-reports varies between the two measures. The results are consistent across three different contemporary major commercial first-person shooter (FPS) games (Prey, Doom 3, and Bioshock).

References

  1. Boucsein, W. 1992. Electrodermal Activity. Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brave, S. and Nass, C. 2002. Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications. J. A. Jacko, A. Sears, Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2002, 81--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G. and Berntson, G. G. 2007. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Drachen, A. and Canossa, A. 2009. Analyzing Spatial user Behavior in Computer Games using Geographic Information Systems. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference, ACM, 182--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frijda, N. H. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ijsseltein, W. A., Poels, K., and De Kort, Y. 2008. The game experience questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess player experiences of digital games. FUGA technical report, Deliverable 3.3, Technical University Eindhoven.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Law, E., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., Hassenzahl, M., and Blythe, M. 2007. Towards a UX manifesto. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2008: People and Computers XXI: HCI...but not as we know it, vol. 2, 205--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mandryk, R. L., Inkepn, K. M., and Calvert, W. 2006. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. In Behavior &amp; Information Technology. ACM. 25: 2, 141--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mandryk, R. L., Atkins, M. S. and Inkpen, K. M. 2006. A Continuous and Objective Evaluation of Emotional Experience with Interactive Play Environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM, 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mandryk, R. L. and Atkins, M. S. 2007. A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 329--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mandryk, R. L. 2008. Physiological Measures for Game Evaluation. In Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience. Elsevier Science &amp; Technology Books, 207--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Martinez, H. P., Jhala, A., and Yannakakis, G. 2009. Analyzing the Impact of Camera Viewpoint on Player Psychophysiology. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Affective Computing &amp; Intelligent Interaction, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nacke, L. E. 2009. Affective Ludology: Scientific Measurement of User Experience in Interactive Entertainment. Ph.D. Thesis. Blekinge Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nacke, L. and Lindley, C. 2009. Affective Ludology, Flow and Immersion in a First-Person Shooter: Measurement of Player Experience. Loading... 3, 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nacke, L. E., Drachen, A. and Goebel, S. 2010. Methods for Evaluating Gameplay Experience in a Serious Gaming Context. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport. 9, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pagulayan, R., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R. L., and Fuller, T. 2003. User-centered design in games. In The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 883--906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M. and Kivikangas, M. 2006. Spatial Presence and Emotions During Video Game Playing: Does It Matter with Whom You Play? PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 4, 381--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ravaja, N. 2004. Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology 6, 193--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Saari, T., Puttonen, S. and Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. 2008. The psychophysiology of James Bond: Phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion 8, 1, 114--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Yannakakis, G. N., Hallam, J. and Lund, H. H. 2008. Entertainment capture through heart rate activity in physical interactive playgrounds. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18, 1, 207--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            ACM Conferences cover image
            Sandbox '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games
            July 2010
            85 pages
            ISBN:9781450300971
            DOI:10.1145/1836135

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 July 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 36 of 121 submissions, 30%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!