skip to main content
research-article

Autonomous vehicle coordination with wireless sensor and actuator networks

Published:19 November 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A coordinated team of mobile wireless sensor and actuator nodes can bring numerous benefits for various applications in the field of cooperative surveillance, mapping unknown areas, disaster management, automated highway and space exploration. This article explores the idea of mobile nodes using vehicles on wheels, augmented with wireless, sensing, and control capabilities. One of the vehicles acts as a leader, being remotely driven by the user, the others represent the followers. Each vehicle has a low-power wireless sensor node attached, featuring a 3D accelerometer and a magnetic compass. Speed and orientation are computed in real time using inertial navigation techniques. The leader periodically transmits these measures to the followers, which implement a lightweight fuzzy logic controller for imitating the leader's movement pattern. We report in detail on all development phases, covering design, simulation, controller tuning, inertial sensor evaluation, calibration, scheduling, fixed-point computation, debugging, benchmarking, field experiments, and lessons learned.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. and Kasimoglu, I. 2004. Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. J. 2, 4, 351--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Allred, J., Hasan, A., Panichsakul, S., W. Pisano, P. G., J. Huang, R. H., Lawrence, D., and Mohseni, K. 2007. Sensorflock: An airborne wireless sensor network of micro-air vehicles. In Proceedings of the SenSys Conference. ACM, 117--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Balch, T. and Arkin, R. C. 1998. Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 14, 6, 926--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bih, J. 2006. Paradigm shift—An introduction to fuzzy logic. IEEE Potent. 25, 1, 6--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Burgard, W., Moors, M., Stachniss, C., and Schneider, F. 2005. Coordinated multi-robot exploration. IEEE Trans. Robotics 21, 3, 376--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Caruso, M., Bratland, T., Smith, C., and Schneider, R. 1998. A new perspective on magnetic field sensing. Sensors 15, 12, 34--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Caruso, M. J. 2000. Applications of magnetic sensors for low cost compass systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium. 177--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Coates, A., Abbeel, P., and Ng, A. 2008. Learning for control from multiple demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'08). A. McCallum and S. Roweis, Eds. Omnipress, 144--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Das, A., Fierro, R., Ostrowski, V. K. J., Spletzer, J., and Taylor, C. 2002. A vision-based formation control framework. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18, 5, 813--825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Egerstedt, M., Hu, X., and Stotsky, A. 2001. Control of mobile platforms using a virtual vehicle approach. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 46, 11, 1777--1782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. FollowMe. 2008. Demonstration video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzWYO5dbo1M.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fredslund, J. and Mataric, M. 2002. A general algorithm for robot formations using local sensing and minimal communication. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18, 5, 837--846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fritz, H. 1999. Longitudinal and lateral control of heavy duty trucks for automated vehicle following in mixed traffic: Experimental results from the chauffeur project. Control Appl. 2, 1348--1352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaura, E. and Newman, R. 2006. Wireless sensor networks: The quest for planetary field sensing. In Proceedings of the LCN Conference. 596--603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayat, D. 2002. Traffic regulation system for the future automated highway. Syst. Man Cybernet. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Henkind, S. J. and Harrison, M. 1988. An analysis of four uncertainty calculi. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 18, 5, 700--714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., and Morse, A. 2003. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 6, 988--1001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Liu, S., Tan, D., and Liu, G. 2007. Robust leader-follower formation control of mobile robots based on a second order kinematics model. Acta Autom. Sinica 33, 9, 947--955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mamdani, E. H. and Assilian, S. 1975. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man-Mach. Studies 7, 1, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Marin-Perianu, M. and Havinga, P. 2007. D-FLER: A distributed fuzzy logic engine for rule-based wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the UCS Conference. 86--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ögren, P., Egerstedt, M., and Hu, X. 2002. A control lyapunov function approach to multiagent coordination. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18, 5, 847-851.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. PNI Corporation. 2008. PNI corporation homepage. http://www.pnicorp.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Reynolds, C. 1987. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Comput. Graph. 21, 4, 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Samarasooriya, V. N. S. and Varshney, P. K. 2000. A fuzzy modeling approach to decision fusion under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 1, 59--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stipanovic, D., Inalhan, G., Teo, R., and Tomlin, C. 2004. Decentralized overlapping control of a formation of unmanned aerial vehicles. Automatica 40, 8, 1285--1296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. STMicroelectronics. 2008. ST Microelectronics homepage. http://www.st.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Swaroop, D. and Hedrick, J. 1996. String stability of interconnected systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 3, 41, 349--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Tanner, H., Jadbabaie, A., and Pappas, G. 2004. Flocking in teams of nonholonomic agents. In Cooperative Control. Springer, 229--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Titterton, D. and Weston, J. 2004. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology, 2nd ed. Institution of Electrical Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuck, K. 2007. Tilt sensing using linear accelerometers. Tech. rep. AN3461, Freescale Semiconductor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vidal, R., Shakernia, O., and Sastry, S. 2004. Following the flock. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 11, 4, 14-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Wang, Z., Chen, P., Song, Z., Chen, Y., and Moore, K. 2005. Formation control in mobile actuator/sensor networks. Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technol. VII 5804, 1, 706--717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, Z., Song, Z., Chen, P.-Y., Arora, A., Stormont, D., and Chen, Y. 2004. Masmote—A mobility node for mas-net (mobile actuator sensor networks). Robot. Biomim. 816--821.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Autonomous vehicle coordination with wireless sensor and actuator networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!