skip to main content
10.1145/1882992.1883041acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"…is it normal to be this sore?":: using an online forum to investigate barriers to physical activity

Published:11 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The importance of regular physical activity to overall health has been well established, yet U.S. adults are leading increasingly sedentary lives. Research suggests that lowering perceived barriers to physical activity is a critical part of interventions that encourage physical activity. In this paper, we describe the top five barriers---two of which have not been reported as principle barriers in the literature---that emerged from our systematic qualitative coding of an online forum used to support a three-month healthy lifestyle intervention. Based on our analysis, we identify design considerations for technologies that encourage and support physical activity. Understanding the needs of a population is a critical step in the design process, and this paper offers unique insights for those working in this growing domain.

References

  1. Ali-Hasan, N., Gavales, D., Peterson, A., Raw, M. Fitster: Social Fitness Information Visualizer. In Extended Abstracts of CHI '06, (Apr 2006), 1795--800. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arguello, J., et al. Talk to Me: Foundations for Successful Individual-Group Interactions in Online Communities. Proc CHI 2006, (2006), 959--968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bickmore, T.W., Caruso, L. & Clough-Gorr, K. Acceptance and Usability of a Relational Agent Interface by Urban Older Adults, In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts, (Apr 2005), 1212--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Booth, M.L., Bauman, A., Owen, N., & Gore, C.J. Physical Activity Preferences, Preferred Sources of Assistance, and Perceived Barriers to Increased Activity among Physically Active Australians, Preventative Medicine, 26(1), (1997), 131--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brown, P., et al.. Perceived Constraints and Social Support for Active Leisure Among Mothers with Young Children. Leis Sciences, 23(3), (2001) 131--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brownson, R.C., et al. Environmental and Policy Determinants of Physical Activity in the United States. Am J Public Health 91, 12 (2001) 1995--2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chinn, D.J., et al. Barriers to Physical Activity and Socioeconomic Position: Implications for Health Promotion. J Epidem Comm H, 53(3), (1999), 191--2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Christakis, N.A. & Fowler, J.H. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years, New England J of Medicine, 357, (2007), 370--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., & Landay, J.A. Design Requirements for Technologies that Encourage Physical Activity, In Proc. of CHI '06, (Apr 2006), 457--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Consolvo, S., et al. Flowers or a Robot Army? Encouraging Awareness & Activity with Personal, Mobile Displays. In Proc. of UbiComp '08, (Sep 2008), 54--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Consolvo, S., et al. Activity Sensing in the Wild: A Field Trial of UbiFit Garden, In Proc. of CHI '08, (Apr 2008), 1797--806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dishman, R.K. Exercise adherence. In R.N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L.K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of sports psychology. NY: Macmillan, (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishman, R.K., Washburn, R.A., & Heath, G.W. Physical Activity Epidemiology. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dworkin, S. "Holding Back": Negotiating a Glass Ceiling on Women's Muscular Strength. Sociological Perspectives, 44(3), (2001) 333--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Eyler, A.A., et al. Physical Activity and Minority Women: A Qualitative Study. Health Education & Behavior, 25(5), (1998), 640--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fahrenwald, N.L. & Walker, S.N. Application of the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change to the Physcial Activity Behavior of WIC Mothers. Public Health Nursing, 20(4), (2003), 307--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Farnham, S. et al. HutchWorld: clinical study of computer-mediated social support for cancer patients and their caregivers. Proc. CHI 2002, (2002), 375--382 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Festinger, L., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Univ Press, (1957).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Finch, C., Owen, N., & Price, R. Current Injury or Disability as a Barrier to Being More Physically Active. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(5), (2001), 778--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fogg, B.J. & Eckles, D. (Eds.), Mobile Persuasion: 20 Perspectives on the Future of Behavior Change, Stanford Captology Media, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Gasser, R., Brodbeck, D., Degen, M., Luthiger, J., Wyss, R., & Reichlin, S. Persuasiveness of a Mobile Lifestyle Coaching Application Using Social Facilitation. In Proc of Persuasive '06, (2006), 27--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY, USA: Doubleday Anchor, (1959).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, A.E. Perceived barriers to and benefits of physical activity among Black and White women. Women in Sport & Phys Act Journal, 7(2), (1998) 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ionescu, A. Bedsider. Presented at Mobile Health, Stanford, CA, USA (May 25, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Janz, N.K., & Becker, M.H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Quart, 11, 1--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. King, A.C., et al. Personal and Environmental Factors Associated with Physical Inactivity Among Different Racial-Ethnic Groups of U.S. Middle-Ages and Older-Aged Women. Health Psych, 19(4), (2000), 354--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, (1977), 159--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Leary, M.R., Tchividjian, L.R., Kraxberger, B.E. Self-Presentation Can Be Hazardous to Your Health: Impression Mangement and Health Risk. Health Psychology, 13(6), (1994) 461--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin, J.J., et al. "Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game," In Proc of UbiComp '06, (Sep 2006), 261--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maitland, J. et al. Increasing the Awareness of Daily Activity Levels with Pervasive Computing, In Proc. of Pervasive Healthcare '06, (Nov/Dec 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E.D., Davidson, P.R. & Greenblatt, D. MAHI: Investigation of Social Scaffolding for Reflective Thinking in Diabetes Management, In Proc. of CHI '08, (Apr 2008), 477--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Nat'l Institute of Health http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/ {link verified 24 Aug 2010}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Preece, J. Empathic communities: Balancing Emotional and Factual Communication. Interacting with Computers 12 (1999), 63--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Rachlin, H. The Science of Self-Control, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ransdell, L.G., et al. Can Physical Activity Interventions Change Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers. Am J of Health Studies, 19(4), (2004), 195--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sallis, J.F., et al. A Multivariate Study of Determinants of Vigorous Exercise in a Community Sample. Preventive Medicine, 18(1), (1989), 20--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sallis, J.F & Owen, N. Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Pub, (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sechrist, K.R., Walker, S.N., & Pender, N.J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefits/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health, 10(6), (1987), 357--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Seefeldt, V., Malina, R.M., Clark, M.A. Factors Affecting Levels of Physical Activity in Adults. Sports Medicine, 32(3), (2002) 143--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Toscos, T. et al. Encouraging Physical Activity in Teens: Can technology help reduce barriers to physical activity in adolescent girls. In Proc. of Pervasive Healthcare '08, (Jan/Feb 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Toscos, T. & Connelly, K. Chapter 10: Using Behavior Change Theory to Understand and Guide Technological Interventions. In B. Hayes and W. Aspray (Eds.) Health Informatics: A Patient-Centered Approach to Diabetes, MIT Press (in press, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Trost, S.G., et al. Correlates of Adults' Participation in Physical Activity: Review and Update. Med & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34(12), (2002) 1996--2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. U.S. Dept of Health & Human Svcs, Pub Health Svc, Centers for Dis Control & Prev, Nat'l Ctr for Chronic Dis Prev & Health Prom, & Div of Nut and Phys Act, Promoting Physical Activity: A Guide for Community Action, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Dept of Health & Human Svcs (2003) Physical Activity Fundamental to Preventing Disease, http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reportsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Viera, A.J. & Garrett, J.M. Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic. Family Medicine 37(5), (May 2005), 360--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilcox, S., et al. Determinants of Leisure Time Physical Activity in Rural Compared with Urban Older and Ethnically Diverse Women in the United States. J of Epidemiology Community Health, 54(9), (2000) 667--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Williams, B.R., et al. The Effect of a Walking Program on Perceived Benefits and Barriers to Exercise in Postmenopausal African American Women. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 29(2), (2006), 43--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Zunft, H.F., et al. Perceived Benefits and Barriers to Physical Activity in a Nationally Representative Sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutrition, 2(1A), (1999), 153--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "…is it normal to be this sore?":: using an online forum to investigate barriers to physical activity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHI '10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium
      November 2010
      886 pages
      ISBN:9781450300308
      DOI:10.1145/1882992

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader