skip to main content
10.1145/191029.191161acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Engaging students and teaching modern concepts: literate, situated, object-oriented programming

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 March 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes our experience in using situated programming to deliver modern computer science concepts in the introductory programming course at Carnegie Mellon University. We used an artificial life simulation and taught object-oriented programming as well as more traditional material. The course was an experience, not an experiment, since many aspects of the course simultaneously changed from prior offerings. Nevertheless, what we saw was fundamental and potentially far-reaching. The most important result was that students were intellectually engaged. They came to grips with basic object-oriented programming, they mastered the topics of procedural programming, they learned first hand about computer simulation, they learned perhaps a bit about biology. Most importantly, through it all they used programming to express and explore their own powerful and novel ideas.

References

  1. 1."Situated Programming" was coined by Paul Horwitz of Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. at the NSF's Application's of Advarw.exl Technologies Project Director's Meeting, June 23-25, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Koffman, E.P., Miller, P.L. and Wardle, C.E. Recommended Curriculum of CSI, 1984: A Report of the ACM Curriculum Committee Taskforce for CSI., Communications ofthe ACM, 27(10) pp. 998-1001, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Abelson, H. and Sussman, G. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Claney, Michael J. and Linn, Marcia C., Ftmctional Fun, Proceedings of the Twenty.First SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, February 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Henderson, Peter B, and Romero, francisco, J, Teaching Recursion as a Problem Solving Tool Using Standard ML, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second SIGCSE Technical Sym. posium on Computer Science Education, M~Tch 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Roberts, Eric, Using C in CSI: Evaluating the Stanford Experience, Proceedings of the Twenty.Fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Ibid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Denning, Peter J.; et. al., Computing as a Discipline. (Final Report of the Task Force on the Core of Computer Science), Conununications of the ACM, v32 p9(15) Jan 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Cohen, B., The Inverted Curriculum, National Economics Development Council, London 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Hilburn, Thomas B., ATop~Down Approach to Teaching an Introductory Computer Science Course, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Stehlik, Mark, report for the panel Approaches to Progrmmning Assignments in CS i and CS2, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Corn. purer Science Education, March 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Meyer, Bertrand, Toward an Object-Oriented Curriculum, Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, v6 p76(6) May 1993,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Lima, Marcia C., and Clancy, Michael J. The Case for Case Studies of Programming Problems, Communications oftheACM, v35 p121(12) March 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Decker, Rick and Hirshiield, Smart, Top-Down Teaching with OOE Proceedings of the Twenty.Fourth SIGCSE Techra'cal Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Wu, C. Thomas, Teaching OOP to Beginners, Journal of Object-Orlented Programming. v6 p47(4) March-April 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Meyer, Bertrand, Ibid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Pattis, Richard E., Karel the Robot. A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Programming, john Wiley & Sons, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Brusilovslcy, Peter, Calabrese, E., Hvorecky, J., Kouchnierenko, A., Miller, P., Mini-languages: a way for learning the principles of programming. Workshop at CAL 93, University of York, Alxil 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.However, unlike Karel, SmallTalk is used for industrial programming in many parts of the country.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.In addition to our ~intments in Computer Science at CMU we are a part of the Center for Light Microscope Imaging and Biotechnology, a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Miller, P. and Chsndhok, R. The Design and Implementation of the Pascal Genie, Proceedings of the Twentieth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Educat/o~ Louisville, KY, February 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.MacApp, ~ Apple Computer Co. 1984 - 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Pattis, Richard E., Ibid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Pane, J. and Miller, P. The ACSE Multimedia Science Learning Environment, International Conference on Computers in Education, Taipei, Taiwan, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Fazarinc, Zvonko, Overhead in Writing Physics Courseware, Proceedings of the Asia.Pacific Conference on Com. purer Education, October 26-28, 1988, Shanghai China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Engaging students and teaching modern concepts: literate, situated, object-oriented programming

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '94: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education
          March 1994
          414 pages
          ISBN:0897916468
          DOI:10.1145/191029

          Copyright © 1994 ACM

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 March 1994

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader
        About Cookies On This Site

        We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

        Learn more

        Got it!