Abstract
Any observant teacher of computer science at secondary or post-secondary level in an English-speaking country has probably noticed that there are considerably more boys than girls in the class. Many are concerned that there are able girls who would enjoy the challenge of a computing career who are choosing not to study computer science, students who may be more capable than many of the boys selecting these studies. The aim of this paper is to look at some of the factors which may influences the students' decisions to study computer science: the nature of the workforce, the prevalence of male and female role models, stereotyping of computing careers, culturally specific factors, perceived gender differences in ability, attitudes to computing, the organization of computing classes, approaches to assessment, and mentoring.
- Borresen, C. R. (1990). Success in introductory statistics with small groups. College Teaching, 38(1) 128-133.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Caner, R. (1993). Electronics education for women: evolving new approaches. Presentation at the Seventh GASAT Conference . University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: 31 July - 5 August.Google Scholar
- Castles, I. (1989). Year Book Australia, 1989. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.Google Scholar
- Chambers, S. M., & Clarke, V. A. (1987). Is inequity cumulative? The relationship between disadvantaged group membership and students' computing experience, knowledge, attitudes and intentions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(4) 495- 517.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Chert, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience and attitudes. Presentation at the annual meeting of Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.Google Scholar
- Clarke, V. A. (1985). Computing in a social context. In K. Duncan & D. Harris (Eds.), Computers in education: Proceedings of the IFIP 4th Worm Conference on Computers in Education, (pp. 833- 838). Amsterdam: North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Clarke, V. A., & Chambers, S. M. (1989). Gender-based factors in computing enrollments and achievements: Evidence from a study of tertiary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5 409-429.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Clarke, V. A., & Teague, G. J. (1993). Have you considered computing? Correcting inaccurate perceptions of computing careers. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Clarke, V. A., & 'league, G. J. (1994). Encouraging girls to study computer science - should we even try? Australian Educational Coraputing, In Press.Google Scholar
- Department of Employment, Education and Training, Economic and Policy Analysis Division, (1990). Education and Training Needs of Computing Professionals and Para-professionals in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A socialrole interpretation. HUlsdale, NJ: Lawrence Williams Associates.Google Scholar
- Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43 95-103.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Fennema, E. (1983). Success in mathematics. In M. Marland (Ed.), Sex differentiation and schooling London: Heinmann Educational Books.Google Scholar
- Frenkel, K. A. (1990). Women and computing. Communications of the ACM, 11(11) 34-46. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- HaIL R. M., & Sandier, B. R. (1982). The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? Washington, D. C.: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
- Hanchey, C, M. (1993). Labs, learning styles, and gender. In The magic of technology: Proceedings of NECC '93, (pp. 255-258). Orlando, Florida: National Educational Computing Conference.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J., & Fitzgerald, D. (1987). Sex differences in attitudes, achievement and use of computers. Australian Journal of Education, 31(1) 3-26.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Hyde, J. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using w2 and d. American Psychologist, 36 3-26.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jones, T., & Clarke, V. A. (1993). Girls and computers: An assessment of the advantage of single-sex settings. Presentation at Networking in the 90's. The 2rid Women in Computing Conference, Melbourne, July.Google Scholar
- Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. (1989). Gender, mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18 (17-19) 22-27.Google Scholar
- Lovegrove, G., & Hall, W. (1991). Where are the girls now? In G. Lovegrove & B. Segal (Eds.), Women into Computing (pp. 33-45). London: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Maceoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Paay, J., Gibson, R., & Hartnett, J. (1993). Not (the power of one): Building networks with a mentor scheme. In Networking in the 90"s: Proceedings of the 2nd Women in Computing Conference, (pp. 60-69). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Parker, L. H., & Rermie, L. J. (1993). Towards gender-fair assessment in science 1" The process of the research. In S. Haggerty & A. Holmes (Eds.), Transforming Science and Technology: Our Future Depends On It. Contributions to the Seventh GASAT Conference, 2 (pp. 1010-1019). University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Reilly, B,, & Morton, M. (1991). Performance in a nationwide mathematics examination at tertiary entrance level. In L. J. Rennie, L. H. Parker, & G. M. Hildebrand (Eds.), Action for Equity: The Second Decade Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, 1 (pp. 301-309). Melbourne: Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Ruffin, C., & Clarke, V. (1992). Sex role messages and the computing media. Presentation at the Twenty.first Meeting of Australian Social Psychologists,Google Scholar
- Salvano, S. (1993). Non-traditional occupations- 20 years progress? In Networking in the 90's: Proceedings of the 2nd Women in Computing Conference, (pp. 3-8). Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Sampson, S. N. (1991). Progress of women in employment in science related areas of work: the Australian picture. Presentation at Action for Equity: the Second Decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference, Melbourne, 14-19 July.Google Scholar
- Saunders, J., & McGinnis, M. (1989, February, date unknown). Letter to the editor. Encouragement needed, international Herald Tribune.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C. (1992). Contained in a meeting agenda for the Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Board, Information Technology Field of Study, Melbourne, July.Google Scholar
- Teague, G. J., & Clarke, V. A. (1991). Fiction and fact: Students' and professionals' perceptions of women in computer science. In I. V. Ericksson, B. A. Kitchenham, & K. G. Tijdens (Eds.), Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education (pp. 363-375). Amsterdam: North- Holland.Google Scholar
- Teague, G. J., & Clarke, V. A. (1993a). Attracting women to tertiary computing courses. SIGCSE Bulletin, 25(1) 208-212. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Teague, G. J., & Clarke, V. A. (1993b). Choosing a career: why are girls not attracted to computing? Presentation at Networking for the 90's: The 2nd Women in Computing Conference, Melbourne, July.Google Scholar
- Tijdem, K. (1991). Women in EDP departments. In I. V. Eriksson, B. A. Kitchertham, & K. G. Tijdens (Eds.), Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education (pp. 377-390). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Tidwell, J. (1990). Hackers in the Garden: A Case Study of Women in Computer Engineering. MIT: unpublished.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education (1993). Statistics from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educattonal Statistics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Ware, M. C., & Stuck, M. F. (1985). Sex-role messages vis-a-vis microcomputer use: A look at the pictures. Sex Roles, 13 205-231.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Williams, R. E. (1989, February, date unknown.). Letter to the editor. Pioneer programmers. International Herald Tribune.Google Scholar
Index Terms
A psychological perspective on gender differences in computing participation
Recommendations
A psychological perspective on gender differences in computing participation
SIGCSE '94: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science educationAny observant teacher of computer science at secondary or post-secondary level in an English-speaking country has probably noticed that there are considerably more boys than girls in the class. Many are concerned that there are able girls who would ...
Gender Differences in Class Participation in Core CS Courses
ITiCSE '21: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1In terms of students enrolled, post-secondary computer science classes are typically male dominated, which can create a baseline perception of male dominance in class participation. This paper presents our analysis of participation scores received by ...
Age and gender differences in photo tagging gratifications
The immense popularity of Facebook use among people from varying demographic groups has attracted the attention of communication scholars. While much is known about the age and gender differences in Facebook usage patterns and the general gratifications ...






Comments