skip to main content
10.1145/192161.192266acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Planning motions with intentions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 July 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

We apply manipulation planning to computer animation. A new path planner is presented that automatically computes the collision-free trajectories for several cooperating arms to manipulate a movable object between two configurations. This implemented planner is capable of dealing with complicated tasks where regrasping is involved. In addition, we present a new inverse kinematics algorithm for the human arms. This algorithm is utilized by the planner for the generation of realistic human arm motions as they manipulate objects. We view our system as a tool for facilitating the production of animation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 1.Atkeson, Christopher and Hollerbach, John. Kine-matic Features of Unrestrained Arm Movements. MIT AI Memo 790, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Baraff, David. Analytical Method for Dynamic Simu-lation of Non-Penetrating Rigid Bodies. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'89 (Boston, Massachusetts, July 31 -August 4, 1989). In Computer Graphics 23, 3 (July 1989), 223-232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Barraquand, Jerome and Latombe, Jean-Claude. Robot Motion Planning: A Distributed Representa-tion Approach. Int. J. Robotics Research, 10(6), De-cember 1991, 628-649. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Bobrow, J.E., Dubowsky, S., Gibson, J.S. Time-Optimal Control of Robotic Manipulators Along Specified Paths. Int. J. Robotics Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1985, 3-17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.Bruderlin, Armin and Calvert, Thomas. Goal-directed, dynamic animation of human walking. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'89 (Boston, Massachusetts, July 31 -August 4, 1989). In Computer Graphics 23, 3 (July 1989), 233-242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Ching, Wallace and Badler, Norman. Fast motion planning for anthropometric figures with many de-grees of freedom. Proc. 1992 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, 1992, 2340- 2345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.Ferbach, Pierre and Barraquand, Jerome. A Penalty Function Method for Constrained Motion Planning. Rep. No. 34, Paris Research Lab., DEC, Sept. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Flash, T. and Hogan, N. The Coordination of Arm Movements: An Experimentally Confirmed Mathe-matical Model. MIT AI Memo 786, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Hahn, James K. Realistic Animation of Rigid Bod-ies. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'88 (Atlanta, Geor-gia, August 1-5, 1988). In Computer Graphics 22, 4 (August 1988), 299-308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Hollerbach, John and Atkeson, Christopher. Deducing Planning Variables from Experimental Arm Trajecto-ries: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Biological Cybernetics, 56(5), 1987, 279-292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Koga, Y., Lastennet, T., Latombe, J.C., and Li, T.Y. Multi-Arm Manipulation Planning. Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Automation and Robotics in Construction, Tokyo, June 1992, 281-288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.Koga, Yoshihito. On Computing Multi-Arm Manipu-lation Trajectories. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (in preparation). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Kondo, Koichi. Inverse Kinematics of a Human Arm. Rep. STAN-CS-TR-94-1508, Department of Com-puter Science, Stanford University, CA, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Lacquaniti, F. and Soechting, J.F. Coordination of Arm and Wrist Motion During A Reaching Task. The Jour-nal of Neuroscience, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1982, 399-408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. 15.Laumond, Jean-Paul and Alami, Rachid. A Geomet-rical Approach to Planning Manipulation Tasks: The Case of a Circular Robot and a Movable Circular Object Amidst Polygonal Obstacles. Rep. No. 88314, LAAS, Toulouse, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Latombe, Jean-Claude. Robot Motion Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Lee, P., Wei, S., Zhao, J., and Badler, N.I. Strength guided motion. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'90 (Dal-las, Texas, August 6-10, 1990). In Computer Graphics 24, 4 (August 1990), 253-262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Lengyel, J., Reichert, M., Donald, B.R., and Green-berg, D.P. Real-Time Robot Motion Planning Using Rasterizing Computer Graphics Hardware. Proceed-ings of SIGGRAPH'90 (Dallas, Texas, August 6-10, 1990). In Computer Graphics 24, 4 (August 1990), 327-335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Lozano-P~ erez, Tomas. Spatial Planning: A Configu-ration Space Approach. IEEE Tr. Computers, 32(2), 1983, pp. 108-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.McCormick, E.J. and Sanders, M.S. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill Book Com-pany, New York, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.McKenna, Michael and Zeltzer, David. Dynamic sim-ulation of autonomous legged locomotion. Proceed-ings of SIGGRAPH'90 (Dallas, Texas, August 6-10, 1990). In Computer Graphics 24, 4 (August 1990), 29-38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Pertin-Troccaz, Jocelyn. Grasping: A State of the Art. In The Robotics Review 1, O. Khatib, J.J. Craig, and T. Lozano-P~ erez, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989, 71-98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Pieper, D. and Roth, B. The Kinematics of Manip-ulators Under Computer Control. Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Vol. 2, Zakopane, Poland, 1969, 159-169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Quinlan, Sean. Efficient Distance Computation Be-tween Non-Convex Objects. To appear in Proc. 1994 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.Raibert, Marc and Hodgins, Jessica. Animation of Dynamic Legged Locomotion. Proceedings of SIG-GRAPH'91 (Las Vegas, Nevada, July 28 - August 2, 1991). In Computer Graphics 25, 4 (July 1991), 349-358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Smith, A.M. et al. Group Report: What Do Studies of Specific Motor Acts Such as Reaching and Grasping Tell Us about the General Principles of Goal-Directed Motor Behaviour? Motor Contro: Concepts and Is-sues, D.R Humphrey and H,J, Freund, eds., John Wi-ley and Sons, New York, 1991, 357-381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Soechting, J.F. and Terzuolo, C.A. An Algorithm for the Generation of Curvilinear Wrist Motion in an Arbitrary Plane in Three Dimensional Space. Neu-roscience, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1986, 1393-1405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Soechting, J.F. and Terzuolo, C.A. Organization of Arm Movements in Three Dimensional Space. Wrist Motion is Piecewise Planar. Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1987, 53-61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. 29.Soechting, J.F. and Flanders, M. Sensorimotor Rep-resentations for Pointing to Targets in Three Dimen-sional Space. Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 62, No. 2, 1989, 582-594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.Soechting, J.F. and Flanders, M. Errors in Pointing are Due to Approximations in Sensorimotor Transfor-mations. Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 62, No. 2, 1989, 595-608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. 31.Soechting, J.F. Elements of Coordinated Arm Move-ments in Three-Dimensional Space. Perspectives on the Coordination of Movement, edited by S.A. Wal-lace, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1989, 47-83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Tournassoud, P., Lozano-P~ erez, T., and Mazer, E. Re-grasping. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automa-tion, Raleigh, NC, 1987, 1924-1928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.Webber, B., Badler, N., Baldwin, F.B., Beckett, W., DiEugenio, B., Geib, C., Jung, M., Levinson, L., Moore, M., and White, M. Doing what you're told: followingtask instructions in changing, but hospitable environments. SIGGRAPH '93 Course note 80 "Re-cent Techniques in Human Modeling, Animation and Rendering", 1993, 4.3-4.31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.Wilfong, G. Motion Planning in the Presence of Mov-able Obstacles. Proc. 4th ACM Symp. Computational Geometry, 1988, 279-288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Planning motions with intentions

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
            July 1994
            512 pages
            ISBN:0897916670
            DOI:10.1145/192161

            Copyright © 1994 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 July 1994

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGGRAPH '94 Paper Acceptance Rate57of242submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader