skip to main content
10.1145/192161.192272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 July 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe an implemented system which automatically generates and animates conversations between multiple human-like agents with appropriate and synchronized speech, intonation, facial expressions, and hand gestures. Conversation is created by a dialogue planner that produces the text as well as the intonation of the utterances. The speaker/listener relationship, the text, and the intonation in turn drive facial expressions, lip motions, eye gaze, head motion, and arm gestures generators. Coordinated arm, wrist, and hand motions are invoked to create semantically meaningful gestures. Throughout we will use examples from an actual synthesized, fully animated conversation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. 1.M. Argyle and M. Cook. Gaze and Mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.N. I. Badler, B. A. Barsky, and D. Zeltzer, editors. Making ThemMove: Mechanics, Control, and Animation of Articulated Figures. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.N. I. Badler, C. Phillips and B. L. Webber. Simulating Humans: Computer Graphics, Animation, and Control. Oxford University Press, June 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Welton M. Becket. The jack lisp api. Technical Report MS-CIS-94-01/Graphics Lab 59, University of Pennsylvania, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Tom Calvert. Composition of realistic animation sequences for multiple human figures. In Norman I. Badler, Brian A. Barsky, and David Zeltzer, editors, Making Them Move: Mechanics, Control, and Animation of Articulated Figures, pages 35-50. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.J. Cappella. personal communication, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Justine Cassell, Mark Steedman, Norm Badler, Catherine Pelachaud, Matthew Stone, Brett Douville, Scott Prevost and Brett Achorn. Modeling the interaction between speech and gesture. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Annual Conference, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. 8.Justine Cassell and David McNeill. Gesture and the poetics of prose. Poetics Today, 12:375-404, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.Justine Cassell, David McNeill, and Karl-Erik McCullough. Kids, don't try this at home: Experimental mismatches of speech and gesture. presented at the International Communication Association annual meeting, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.D. T. Chen, S. D. Pieper, S. K. Singh, J. M. Rosen, and D. Zeltzer. The virtual sailor: An implementation of interactive human body modeling. In Proc. 1993 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Seattle, WA, September 1993. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M.M. Cohen and D.W. Massaro. Modeling coarticulation in synthetic visual speech. In N.M. Thalmann and D.Thalmann, editors, Models and Techniques in Computer Animation, pages 139-156. Springer-Verlag, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.G. Collier. Emotional expression. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.W.S. Condon and W.D. Osgton.Speech and body motion synchrony of the speaker-hearer. In D.H. Hortonand J.J. Jenkins, editors, The perceptionof Language, pages 150-184. Academic Press, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.S. Duncan. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. In Weitz, editor, Nonverbal Communication. Oxford University Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.P. Ekman. Movements with precise meanings. The Journal of Communication, 26, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.P. Ekman. About brows: emotional and conversational signals. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, and D. Ploog, editors, Humanethology: claims and limits of a new disipline: contributions to the Colloquium, pages 169-248. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England; New-York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.P. Ekmanand W. Friesen. Facial Action Coding System. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Jean-Paul Gourret, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and Daniel Thalmann. Simulation of object and human skin deformations in a grasping task. Computer Graphics, 23(3):21-30, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.P. Kalra, A. Mangili, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, and D. Thalmann. Smile: A multilayeredfacial animationsystem. In T.L. Kunii, editor, Modeling in Computer Graphics. Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.A. Kendon. Movement coordination in social interaction: some examples de-scribed. In Weitz, editor, Nonverbal Communication. Oxford University Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.AdamKendon. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M.R.Key, editor, The Relation between Verbal and Nonverbal Communication, pages 207-227. Mouton, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.Jintae Lee and Tosiyasu L. Kunii. Visual translation: From native language to sign language. In Workshop on Visual Languages, Seattle, WA, 1993. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Philip Lee, Susanna Wei, Jianmin Zhao, and Norman I. Badler. Strength guided motion. Computer Graphics, 24(4):253-262, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Mark Liberman and A. L. Buchsbaum. Structure and usage of current Bell Labs text to speech programs. Technical MemorandumTM 11225-850731-11, AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Jeffrey Loomis, Howard Poizner, Ursula Bellugi, Alynn Blakemore, and John Hollerbach. Computer graphic modeling of American Sign Language. Computer Graphics, 17(3):105-114, July 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann and Daniel Thalmann. Human body deformations using joint-dependent local operators and finite-element theory. In Norman I. Badler, Brian A. Barsky, and David Zeltzer, editors, Making Them Move: Me-chanics, Control, and Animation of Articulated Figures, pages 243-262.Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.David McNeill. Handand Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. University of Chicago, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.M. Patel. Making FACES. PhD thesis, School of Mathematical Sciences, Univer-sity of Bath, Bath, AVON, UK, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.C. Pelachaud, N.I. Badler, and M. Steedman. Linguistic issues in facial animation. In N. Magnenat-Thalmann and D. Thalmann, editors, Computer Animation '91, pages 15-30. Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.Richard Power. The organisation of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Scott Prevost and Mark Steedman. Generating contextually appropriate intonation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 332-340, Utrecht, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. 32.Ellen F. Prince. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In S. Thompson and W. Mann, editors, Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text, pages 295-325. John Benjamins B.V., 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. 33.Hans Rijpkema and Michael Girard. Computer animation of hands and grasping. Computer Graphics, 25(4):339-348, July 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. 34.Barbara Robertson. Easy motion. Computer Graphics World, 16(12):33-38, December 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.Klaus R. Scherer. The functions of nonverbal signs in conversation. In H. Giles R. St. Clair, editor, The Social and Physhological Contexts of Language, pages 225-243. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.Mark Steedman. Structure and intonation. Language, 67:260-296, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. 37.Akikazu Takeuchi and Katashi Nagao. Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality. In ACM/IFIP INTERCHI'93, Amsterdam, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. 38.K. Tuite. The production of gesture. Semiotica, 93(1/2), 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGGRAPH '94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
        July 1994
        512 pages
        ISBN:0897916670
        DOI:10.1145/192161

        Copyright © 1994 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 July 1994

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGGRAPH '94 Paper Acceptance Rate57of242submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader