10.1145/1940761.1940801acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpsprocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Migrants' information practices and use of social media in Ireland: networks and community

Authors Info & Claims
Online:08 February 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Migrants, having left their home society and community, often depend on electronic modes of communication to maintain contacts with distant friends and relations. Their practices illustrate the affordances provided by social media when face to face communication is not available. This paper describes the information and communication practices of Polish and Filipino nationals in Ireland, based on interviews with over sixty-five migrants in 2009. Migrants display increased dependence on the Internet as an information source and use various electronic media to maintain significant contacts with friends and relations in their home societies. Social media (including Web 2.0) practices have an impact on long distance relations that previous technologies have not had, due to differences in the way these technologies are utilized. Social media usage is a passive monitoring that complements the active communication of first generation technologies; this monitoring creates a background awareness and presence in terms of which active communication takes place, which facilitates bonding as well as bridging capital. This enables resilient and durable transnational links, while also facilitating greater mobility for migrants.

References

  1. Slater, D. and Tacchi, J. 2004. ICT innovations for poverty reduction. UNESCO, Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau for Communication and Information. New Delhi. http://cirac.qut.edu.au/ictpr/downloads/research.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R. and Smith, A. 2007. Teens and social media. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D. C. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Teens-and-Social-Media.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B. and Rainie, L. 2006. The strength of Internet ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D.C. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_ties.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B. and Lin, M.-C. Social interactions across media. 2004. New Media Soc, 6, 3, 299--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Feenberg, A. and Bakardjieva, M. Virtual community: no 'killer implication'. 2004. New Media Soc, 37--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Komito, L. 2004. The Information Revolution & Ireland: prospects and challenges. UCD Press, Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernback, J. 2007. Beyond the diluted community concept: a symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations. New Media Soc, 49--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Postill, J. 2008. Localizing the internet beyond communities and networks. New Media Soc, 413--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Komito, L. 2001. Electronic community in the Information Society: paradise, mirage or malaise? J Doc, 57, 1, 115--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Komito, L. 1998. The Net as a foraging society: flexible communities. Inform Soc, 14, 2, 97--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hiller, H. H. and Franz, T. M. 2004. New ties, old ties and lost ties: the use of the internet in diaspora. New Media Soc, 731--752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Burrell, J. and Anderson, K. 2008. 'I have great desires to look beyond my world': trajectories of information and communication technology use among Ghanaians living abroad. New Media Soc, 203--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Parkham, A. A. 2004. Diaspora, community and communication: Internet use in transnational Haiti. Global Netw, 199--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen, T. H. 2009. 'Connected presence' in distributed family life. New Media Soc, 433--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fresnoza-Flot, A. 2009. Migration status and transnational mothering: the case of Filipino migrants in France. Global Netw, 252--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei, R. and Lo, V.-H. 2006. Staying connected while on the move. New Media Soc, 8, 1, 53--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kavanaugh, A. L., Reese, D. D., Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B. 2003. Weak ties in networked communities. Communities and technologies. M. Huysman, E. Wenger and V. Wulf, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 265--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Portes, A. 2001. Introduction: the debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Netws, 1, 3, 181--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Portes, A. 1999. The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic Racial Stud, 22, 2, 217--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Cohen, R. 1997. Global Diasporas: an introduction. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Home truths about telecoms. 2007. Economist, 383, 8532, 16-m16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Caidi, N., Allard, D. and Quirk, L. 2010. Information Practices of Immigrants. Annual review of information science and technology. Cronin, B., Ed. Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ, 493--531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Caidi, N. 2009. Information practices of immigrants. In Proceedings of the Health Nexus Workshop (30 March, 2009). {http://www.slideshare.net/settlementatwork/information-practices-of-immigrants, accessed 29 August 2010}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Karim, K. H. 2003. The media of diaspora. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cairncross, F. 1997. The Death of Distance. Orion Publishing Group, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Castells, M. 2001. The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L. and Sey, A. 2004. The Mobile Communication Society: A cross-cultural analysis of available evidence on the social uses of wireless communication technology. University of Southern California, Annenberg Research Network on International Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L. and Sey, A. 2006. Mobile communication and society: a global perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wellman, B. and Haythornthwaite, C. A. Eds. 2002 The Internet in everyday life. Blackwell Pub., Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., de Diaz, I. I. and Miyata, K. 2003. The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer Medicated Communication, 8, 3. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/wellman.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rheingold, H. 1994. The virtual community: finding connection in a computerized world. Secker & Warburg, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. 1999. Virtual communities as communities: net surfers don't ride alone. Communities in cyberspace, M. A. Smith and P. Kollock, eds., Routledge, London, 167--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Komito, L. and Bates, J. 2009. Virtually Local: social media and community amongst Polish nationals in Dublin. Aslib Proceedings: new information perspectives, 61, 3, 232--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Universal McCann 2008. Universal McCann Social Media Tracker Wave 3, March 2008. Universal McCann, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Central Statistics Office. 2008. Non-Irish Nationals Living in Ireland. Government Stationery Office, Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert, N. 1993. Researching social life. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hammersley, M. 1993. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 2005. The Sage Hanbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE publications, Newbury Park.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Central Statistics Office. 2009. Persons usually resident and present in the State on Census Night, classified by ethnic or cultural background and nationality, 2006 Census. Government Stationery Office, Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Amárach Research. 2009. Life Online 2009. Amárach Research, Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Wellman, B., Carrington, P. and Hall, 1988. A. Networks as personal communities. Social structures: a network approach, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences vol 2, B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Fischer, C. S. 1982. To dwell among friends: personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wellman, B. 1979. The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1201--1231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Knoke D. and Kuklinkski, J. H. 1982. Network Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. The Migration and Citizenship Research Initiative UCD. 2008. Getting on: from migration to integration. Chinese, Indian, Lithuanian and Nigerian migrants' experiences in Ireland. a report prepared by The Migration and Citizenship Research Initiative, UCD. Immigrant Council of Ireland, Dublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A. and Zickuhr, K. 2010. Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D. C. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360--1380Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ito, M., Okabe, D. and Matsuda, M. 2005. Personal, portable, pedestrian: mobile phones in Japanese life. MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Diminescu, D. 2008. The connected migrant: an epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information, 47, 565--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Migrants' information practices and use of social media in Ireland: networks and community

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!