10.1145/1958824.1958839acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedings
research-article

Improving visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration

ABSTRACT

Collaborative distributed tabletop activities involving real objects are complicated by invisibility factors introduced into the workspace. In this paper, we propose a technique called "remote lag" to alleviate the problems caused by the invisibility of remote gestures. The technique provides people with instant playback of remote gestures to recover from the missed context of coordination. To examine the effects of the proposed technique, we studied four-person groups who engaged in two mentoring tasks using physical objects with and without remote lags. Our results show that remote lags effectively alleviated the invisibility problems, resulting in fewer questions/confirmations and redundant instructions during collaboration. The technique also decreased the overall workload of workers as well as the temporal demands for both helpers and workers.

References

  1. Benford, S., Bowers, J., Lennart, E. F., Greenhalgh, C., and Snowdon, D., 1995. User embodiment collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of CHI'95, ACM Press (1995), 242--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brave, S., Ishii, H., and Dahley, A., Tangible Interfaces for Remote Collaboration and Communication. Proceedings of CSCW'98, ACM Press (1998), 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clark, H. H. and Krych, M. A., Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), (2004), 62--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. and Kramer, A., Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, (2004), 273--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gaver, W. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW'92, ACM Press (1992), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gergle, D., Kraut, R.E., and Fussell, S.R., Language Efficiency and Visual Technology: Minimizing Collaborative Effort with Visual Information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), (2004), 491--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gutwin, C., Improving interpretation of remote gestures with telepointer traces. Proceedings of CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), 49--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gutwin, C., The Effects of Local Lag on Tightly-Coupled Interaction in Distributed Groupware. Proceedings of CSCW'08, ACM Press (2008), 447--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Heath, C. and Luff, P., Disembodied Conduct: Communication Through Video in a Multi-media Office Environment. Proceedings of CHI'91, ACM Press, (1991), 99--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., and Greenhalgh, C., 1998. Fragmented Interaction: establishing mutual orientation virtual environments. Proceedings of CSCW'98, ACM Press, (1998), 217--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 1Jordà,S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M. and Kaltenbrunner, M., The reacTable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. Proceedings of TEI'07, ACM Press, (2007), 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kaji, K., Yamashita, N. and Hirata, K. A Method for Supporting Recognition of Remote Gestures in a Video Communication System. Proceedings of ASIAGRAPH'09, (2009), 84--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirk, D., Crabtree, A., and Rodden, T., Ways of the hands. Proceedings of ECSCW'05, Springer (2005), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kirk, D. Fraser, D., Comparing Remote Gesture Technologies for Supporting Collaborative Physical Tasks. Proceedings of CHI'06, ACM Press, (2006), 1191--1200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kraut, R. E., Gergle, D., and Fussell, S. R., The Use of Visual Information in Shared Visual Spaces: Informing the Development of Virtual Co-Presence. Proceedings of CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kuzuoka, H., Yamashita, J., Yamazaki, K., and Yamazaki, A. Agora: A Remote Collaboration System that Enables Mutual Monitoring, Extended Abstracts of CHI'99, ACM Press (1999), 190--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., and Yamashita, J., Handling documents and discrimination objects in hybrid spaces. Proceedings of CHI'06, ACM Press (2006), 561--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Moore, R., Ducheneaut, N., and Nickell, E., Doing Virtually Nothing: Awareness and Accountability in Massively Multiplayer Online Worlds, JCSCW, 16, 3, (2006), 265--305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ou, J., Fussell, S. R., Chen, X., Setlock, L. D., and Yang, J., Gestural communication over video stream: Supporting multimodal interaction for remote collaborative physical tasks. Proceedings of ICMI'03, ACM Press (2003), 242--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sato, T., Mamiya, H., Koike, H. and Fukuchi, K., PhotoelasticTouch: transparent rubbery interface using a LCD and photoelasticity, Proceedings of UIST'09, ACM Press (2009), 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 2Scott, S. D., Grant, K. D., and Mandryk, R. L., System guidelines for co-located collaborative work on a tabletop display. Proceedings of ECSCW'03, Springer (2003), 159--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 2Sellen, A. Buxton, B., and Arnott, J. Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing. Proceedings of CHI'92, ACM Press (1992), 651--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tang, A., Neustaedter, C., and Greenberg, S., VideoArms: embodiments for mixed presence groupware. Proceedings of British-HCI'06, Springer (2006), 85--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tang, A., Pahud, M., Inkpen, K., Benko, H., Tang, J. C., and Buxton, B., Three's Company: Understanding Communication Channels in Three-way Distributed Collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW'10, ACM Press, (2010), 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tang, J. and Minneman, S., VideoDraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 9, 2 (1991), 453--469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Underkoffler, J. and Ishii, H., Urp: A luminous-tangible workbench for urban planning and design. Proceedings of CHI'99, ACM Press (1999), 386--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yamashita, N, Hirata, K, Aoyagi, S, Kuzuoka, H, Harada, Y., Impact of Seating Positions on Group Video Communication, Proceedings of CSCW'08, ACM Press (2008), 177--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yarosh, S. Inkpen, K., and Brush, A. J. B., Video Playdate: Toward Free Play across Distance. Proceedings of CHI'10, ACM Press, (2010), 1251--1260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. http://www.nrl.navy.mil/aic/ide/NASATLX.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Improving visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader
          About Cookies On This Site

          We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

          Learn more

          Got it!