10.1145/1978942.1979402acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedings
research-article

Ease of juggling: studying the effects of manual multitasking

ABSTRACT

Everyday activities often involve using an interactive device while one is handling various other physical objects (wallets, bags, doors, pens, mugs, etc.). This paper presents the Manual Multitasking Test, a test with 12 conditions emulating manual demands of everyday multitasking situations. It allows experimenters to expose the effects of design on "manual flexibility": users' ability to reconfigure the sensorimotor control of arms, hands, and fingers in order to regain the high performance levels they experience when using the device on its own. The test was deployed for pointing devices on laptops and Qwerty keyboards of mobile devices. In these studies, we identified facilitative design features whose absence explains, for example, why the mouse and stylus function poorly in multi-object performance. The issue deserves more attention, because interfaces that are nominally similar (e.g., "one-handed input") can vary dramatically in terms of "ease of juggling".

References

  1. American Time Use Survey ATUS. Tables for 2009. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/tus/tables/a1_2009.pd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan, R., and MacKenzie, I. Performance dif-ferences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. In Proc. CHI'97, ACM Press (1997), pp. 303--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Crossan, A., Williamson, J., Brewster, S., and Murray-Smith, R. Wrist rotation for interaction in mobile contexts. In Proc. MobileHCI'08, ACM Press (2008), pp. 435--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gokturk, M., and Sibert, J. An analysis of the index finger as a pointing device. In Ext. Abst. CHI'99, ACM Press (1999), pp. 286--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. González, V., and Mark, G. Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. In Proc. CHI'04, ACM Press (2004), pp. 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Guiard, Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behavior 19 (1987), 486--517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Haley, S., Jette A., Coster W. J., et al. Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 57 (2002), 217--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hoggan, E., and Brewster, S. Designing audio and tactile crossmodal icons for mobile devices. In Proc. ICMI'07, ACM Press (2007), pp. 162--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Isokoski, P., and Linden, T. Effect of foreign language on text transcription performance: Finns writing English. In Proc. NordiCHI'04, ACM Press (2004), pp. 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jones, L. A., and Lederman, S. Human Hand Function. Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, L. A., and Piateski, E. Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force. Experimental Brain Research 168 (2006), 298--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Klauer, S. G. et al. An analysis of driver inattetion using a case-crossover approach on 100-car data: Final report. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: DOT HS 811 334, USA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, Y., and Su, M. Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device. Applied Ergonomics 39, 3 (2008), 399--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leganchuk, A., Zhai, S., and Buxton, W. Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study. ACM TOCHI 5, 4 (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lewis, J., Potosnak, K., and Magyar, R. Keys and keyboards. In Helander et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum (1997), NJ, USA, pp. 1285--1315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Loukopoulos, L., Dismukes, R., and Barshi, I. Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study. In Proc. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus: Ohio State University (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Luk, J., Pasquero, J., Little, S., MacLean, K., Levesque, V., and Hayward, V. A role for haptics in mobile interaction. In Proc. CHI'06, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lyons, K., Starner, T., Plaisted, D., Fusia, J., Lyons, A., Drew, A., and Looney, E. Twiddler typing: One-handed chording text entry for mobile phones. In Proc. CHI'04, ACM Press (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. MacKenzie, I., and Soukoreff, R. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In Ext. Abst. CHI'03, ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mainwaring, S. D., Anderson, K., and Chang, M. F. Living for the global city: Mobile kits, urban interfaces, and ubicomp. In Proc. Ubicomp'05, Springer-Verlag (2005), pp. 268--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 2Oakley, I., Sunwoo, J., and Cho, I. Pointing with fingers, hands and arms for wearable computing. In Ext. Abst. CHI'08, ACM Press (2008), pp. 3255--3260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Oulasvirta, A., and Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J. A simple index for multimodal flexibility. In Proc. CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), pp. 1475--1484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ronkainen, S., Koskinen, E., Liu, Y., and Korhonen, P. Environment analysis as a basis for designing multi-modal and multidevice user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2010), 148--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sawhney, N., and Schmandt, C. Nomadic radio: speech and audio interaction for contextual messaging in nomadic environments. ACM TOCHI 7, 3 (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Smith, B. IDTest Cursor Motion Test Application, 1999, http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/basmith/testapp.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stanton, N. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergo-nomics Methods. CRC Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Statistics Finland Time Use Study 1999-2000. http://pxweb2.stat.fi/Database/StatFin/klt/akay/akay_en.as.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A., Toiskallio, K., and Kankainen, A. Understanding mobile contexts. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 2 (2004), 135--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. van Nierop, O., van der Helm, A., Overbeeke, K., and Djajadiningrat, T. A natural human hand model. Visual Computer 24, 1 (2008), 31--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Westbrook, J., Ampt, A., Kearney, L., and Rob, M. All in a day's work: an observational study to quantify how and with whom doctors on hospital wards spend their time. Medical Journal of Australia 188, 9 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Wickens, C. D. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3, 2 (2002), 159--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Witt, H., Nicolai, T., and Kenn, H. Designing a wear-able user interface for hands-free interaction in maintenance applications. In Proc. Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, IEEE (2006), pp. 655--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhai, S., Milgram, P., and Buxton, W. The influence of muscle groups on performance of multiple degree-of-freedom input. In Proc. CHI'96, ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader
About Cookies On This Site

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Learn more

Got it!