Initial results from a study of the effects of meditation on multitasking performance

ABSTRACT

This paper reports initial results from a study exploring whether training in meditation or relaxation can improve office workers' ability to multitask on a computer more effectively andor with less stress. Human resource (HR) personnel were given 8 weeks of training in either mindfulness meditation or body relaxation techniques, and were given a stressful multitasking test both before and after training. (A third group, a control group, received no intervention during the 8-week period but was tested both before and after this period.) Results indicate that overall task time and errors did not differ significantly among the three groups. However, the meditation group reported lower levels of stress and showed better memory for the tasks they had performed; they also switched tasks less often and remained focused on tasks longer.

References

1. Adamczyk, P. D. and Bailey, B. P. (2004). If not now, when?: The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). New York: ACM Press, 271--278.
2. Baer, R.A., Smith, G.T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney. L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27--45.
3. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822--848.
4. Carlson, C.R., & Hoyle, R.H. (1993). Efficacy of abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation training: A quantitative review of behavioral medicine research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 1059--1067.
5. Cohen, D. (2004). The one who is not busy: Connecting with work in a deeply satisfying way. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith.
6. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). New York: ACM Press, 175--182.
7. Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M. and Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). New York: ACM Press, 321--330.
8. Mark, G., Gudith, D. and Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). New York: ACM Press, 107--110.
9. Nielsen, L., & Kaszniak, A. W. (2006). Awareness of subtle emotional feelings: A comparison of long-term meditators and non-meditators. Emotion, 6, 392--405.
10. Ortner, C.N.M., Kilner, S.J., & Zelazo, P.D. (2007). Mindfulness meditation and reduced emotional interference on a cognitive task. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 271--283.
11. Rogers, R. & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207--231.
12. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763--797.
13. Salvucci, D. D. and Bogunovich, P. (2010). Multitasking and monotasking: The effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). New York: ACM Press, 85--88.
14. Slagter, H.A., Lutz, A., Greischar, L.L., Francis, A. Nieuwenhuis, S., Davis, J.M., & Davidson, R.J. (2007). Mental training affects distribution of limited brain resources. PLoS Biology, 5 (6), e138.
15. Yeung, N. & Monsell, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455--469.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing