review-article

Usage analysis and the web of data

Online:24 May 2011Publication History

Abstract

The workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) was the first workshop in the field to investigate combinations of usage data with semantics and the Web of Data. Questions the workshop aims to address are for example: How can semantics help in understanding usage data, how can semantic information be derived from usage data, and how can we learn about usage of and on the emerging Web of Data, and what can we learn from it? We report on the findings and results of this workshop, held on March 28, 2011 in conjunction with 20th International World Wide Web Conference, in Hyderabad, India.

References

  1. F. Abel, I. Celik, C. Hauff, L. Hollink, and G.-J. Houben. U-Sem: Semantic enrichment, user modeling and mining usage data on the social web. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Baeza-Yates and A. Tiberi. Extracting semantic relations from query logs. In 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Jose, California, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Benz, B. Krause, G. P. Kumar, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Characterizing semantic relatedness of search query terms. In 1st Workshop on Explorative Analytics of Information Networks, Bled, Slovenia, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Berendt, L. Hollink, V. Hollink, M. Luczak-Rösch, K. H. Möller, and D. Vallet. USEWOD2011 ¿ 1st international workshop on usage analysis and the web of data. In 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2011), Hyderabad, India, pages 305--306, March-April 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Berendt, G. Stumme, and A. Hotho. Usage mining for and on the Semantic Web. In H. Kargupta, A. Joshi, K. Sivakumar, and Y. Yesha (Eds.), Data Mining: Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions, pages 461--480, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Fortuna, D. Mladenic, and M. Grobelnik. User modeling combining access logs, page content and semantics. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. A. Gallego, J. D. Fernández, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, and P. D. L. Fuente. An empirical study of real-world SPARQL queries. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Hofmann, M. de Rijke, B. Huurnink, and E. Meij. A semantic perspective on query log analysis. In Working Notes for CLEF, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. V. Hollink, T. Tsikrika, and A. P. de Vries. The semantics of query modification. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information (RIAO), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Hollink and A. D. Vries. Towards an automated query modification assistant. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Kirchberg, R. K. L. Ko, and B. S. Lee. From linked data to relevant data - time is the essence. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Meij, M. Bron, L. Hollink, B. Huurnink, and M. de Rijke. Learning semantic query suggestions. In 8th International Semantic Web Conference, Chantilly, VA, USA., 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Mika, E. Meij, and H. Zaragoza. Investigating the semantic gap through query log analysis. In 8th International Semantic Web Conference, Chantilly, VA, USA., 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Möller. Lifecycle Support for Data on the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Möller, M. Hausenblas, R. Cyganiak, and G. Grimnes. Learning from linked open data usage: patterns & metrics. In WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Sakai and K. Nogami. Serendipitous search via wikipedia: a query log analysis. In 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Boston, MA, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Sureka. Mining user comment activity for detecting forum spammers in YouTube. In 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data (USEWOD2011) at the 20th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2011), Hydebarabad, India, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Usage analysis and the web of data

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        ACM SIGIR Forum cover image
        ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 45, Issue 1
        June 2011
        79 pages
        ISSN:0163-5840
        DOI:10.1145/1988852
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2011 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Online: 24 May 2011

        Qualifiers

        • review-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!