10.1145/2071423.2071447acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedings
research-article

Hands-on interactive tabletop LEGO application

ABSTRACT

Presently, multi-touch interactive surfaces have widespread adoption as entertainment devices. Taking advantage of such devices, we present an interactive LEGO application, developed accordingly to an adaptation of building block metaphors and direct multi-touch manipulation. Our solution (LTouchIt) allows users to create 3D models on a tabletop surface. To prove the validity of our approach, we compared LTouchIt with two LEGO applications, conducting a user study with 20 participants. The results suggest that our touch-based application can compete with existing mouse-based applications. It provides users with a hands-on experience, which we believe to be more adequate for entertainment purposes.

References

  1. A. Cohé, F. Decle, and M. Hachet. tBox: A 3D Transformation Widget designed for Touch-screens. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Conner, S. Snibbe, K. Herndon, D. Robbins, R. Zeleznik, and A. Van Dam. Three-dimensional widgets. In Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, pages 183--188. ACM, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Hancock, S. Carpendale, and A. Cockburn. Shallow-depth 3d interaction: Design and evaluation of one-, two-and three-touch techniques. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 1147--1156, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Hancock, T. ten Cate, and S. Carpendale. Sticky tools: Full 6DOF force-based interaction for multi-touchtables. In Proc. ITS, pages 145--152, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. S. Hancock, F. Vernier, D. Wigdor, S. Carpendale, and C. Shen. Rotation and translation mechanisms for tabletop interaction. In Proc. Tabletop, pages 79--86. IEEE Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Kin, M. Agrawala, and T. DeRose. Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009, pages 119--124. Canadian Information Processing Society, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Kruger, S. Carpendale, S. Scott, and A. Tang. Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 601--610. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Martinet, G. Casiez, and L. Grisoni. The design and evaluation of 3d positioning techniques for multi-touch displays. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, pages 115--118. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Martinet, G. Casiez, and L. Grisoni. The effect of dof separation in 3d manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 111--118. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Mendes and A. Ferreira. Virtual lego modelling on multi-touch surfaces. In WSCG'2011 Full Papers Proceedings, pages 73--80, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Nacenta, P. Baudisch, H. Benko, and A. Wilson. Separability of spatial manipulations in multi-touch interfaces. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009, pages 175--182. Canadian Information Processing Society, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Reisman, P. Davidson, and J. Han. A screen-space formulation for 2d and 3d direct manipulation. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 69--78. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Santos, A. Ferreira, F. Dias, and M. J. Fonseca. Using sketches and retrieval to create lego models. EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Shoemake. Arcball: a user interface for specifying three-dimensional orientation using a mouse. In Graphics Interface, volume 92, pages 151--156, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Van Dam. Post-wimp user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 40(2):63--67, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Wilson. Simulating grasping behavior on an imaging interactive surface. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pages 125--132. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. O. Wobbrock, M. R. Morris, and A. D. Wilson. User-defined gestures for surface computing. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '09, pages 1083--1092, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hands-on interactive tabletop LEGO application

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader
      About Cookies On This Site

      We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

      Learn more

      Got it!