skip to main content
research-article

Design of self-supporting surfaces

Published:01 July 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Self-supporting masonry is one of the most ancient and elegant techniques for building curved shapes. Because of the very geometric nature of their failure, analyzing and modeling such strutures is more a geometry processing problem than one of classical continuum mechanics. This paper uses the thrust network method of analysis and presents an iterative nonlinear optimization algorithm for efficiently approximating freeform shapes by self-supporting ones. The rich geometry of thrust networks leads us to close connections between diverse topics in discrete differential geometry, such as a finite-element discretization of the Airy stress potential, perfect graph Laplacians, and computing admissible loads via curvatures of polyhedral surfaces. This geometric viewpoint allows us, in particular, to remesh self-supporting shapes by self-supporting quad meshes with planar faces, and leads to another application of the theory: steel/glass constructions with low moments in nodes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp185_12.mp4

References

  1. Andreu, A., Gil, L., and Roca, P. 2007. Computational analysis of masonry structures with a funicular model. J. Engrg. Mechanics 133, 473--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ash, P., Bolker, E., Crapo, H., and Whiteley, W. 1988. Convex polyhedra, Dirichlet tessellations, and spider webs. In Shaping space (Northampton 1984). Birkhäuser, 231--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, M. R. 2009. Form finding and analysis of tension structures by dynamic relaxation. Int. J. Space Struct. 14, 2, 89--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Block, P., and Lachauer, L. 2011. Closest-fit, compression-only solutions for free form shells. In IABSE --- IASS 2011 London Symposium, Int. Ass. Shell Spatial Structures. {electronic}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, P., and Ochsendorf, J. 2007. Thrust network analysis: A new methodology for three-dimensional equilibrium. J. Int. Assoc. Shell and Spatial Structures 48, 3, 167--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Block, P. 2009. Thrust Network Analysis: Exploring Three-dimensional Equilibrium. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Block, P., 2011. Project webpage at http://block.arch.ethz.ch/projects/freeform-catalan-thin-tile-vaulting.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bobenko, A., and Suris, Yu. 2008. Discrete differential geometry: Integrable Structure. No. 98 in Graduate Studies in Math. American Math. Soc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobenko, A., Pottmann, H., and Wallner, J. 2010. A curvature theory for discrete surfaces based on mesh parallelity. Math. Annalen 348, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cohen-Steiner, D., and Morvan, J.-M. 2003. Restricted Delaunay triangulations and normal cycle. In Proc. 19th Symp. Computational Geometry, ACM, 312--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Davis, L., Rippmann, M., Pawlofsky, T., and Block, P. 2011. Efficient and expressive thin-tile vaulting using cardboard formwork. In IABSE --- IASS 2011 London Symposium, Int. Ass. Shell Spatial Structures. {electronic}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraternali, F., Angelillo, M., and Fortunato, A. 2002. A lumped stress method for plane elastic problems and the discrete-continuum approximation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 6211--6240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fraternali, F. 2010. A thrust network approach to the equilibrium problem of unreinforced masonry vaults via polyhedral stress functions. Mechanics Res. Comm. 37, 2, 198--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Friedlander, M. P., 2007. BCLS: Bound constrained least squares. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mpf/bcls.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Giaquinta, M., and Giusti, E. 1985. Researches on the equilibrium of masonry structures. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 88, 4, 359--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Green, A., and Zerna, W. 2002. Theoretical Elasticity. Dover. Reprint of the 1968 edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gründig, L., Moncrieff, E., Singer, P., and Ströbel, D. 2000. A history of the principal developments and applications of the force density method in Germany 1970--1999. In 4th Int. Coll. Computation of Shell & Spatial Structures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Heyman, J. 1966. The stone skeleton. Int. J. Solids Structures 2, 249--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Heyman, J. 1995. The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heyman, J. 1998. Structural Analysis: A Historical Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kilian, A., and Ochsendorf, J. 2005. Particle-spring systems for structural form finding. J. Int. Assoc. Shell and Spatial Structures 46, 77--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotnik, T., and Weinstock, M. 2012. Material, form and force. Architectural Design 82, 104--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Linkwitz, K., and Schek, H.-J. 1971. Einige Bemerkungen zur Berechnung von vorgespannten Seilnetzkonstruktionen. Ingenieur-Archiv 40, 145--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipman, Y., Sorkine, O., Cohen-Or, D., Levin, D., Rossi, C., and Seidel, H. 2004. Differential coordinates for interactive mesh editing. In Shape Modeling Applications, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Liu, Y., Pottmann, H., Wallner, J., Yang, Y.-L., and Wang, W. 2006. Geometric modeling with conical meshes and developable surfaces. ACM Trans. Graphics 25, 3, 681--689. Proc. SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Livesley, R. K. 1992. A computational model for the limit analysis of three-dimensional masonry structures. Meccanica 27, 161--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. O'Dwyer, D. 1998. Funicular analysis of masonry vaults. Computers and Structures 73, 187--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Paige, C. C., and Saunders, M. A. 1975. Solution of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations. SIAM J. Num. Analysis 12, 617--629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Pottmann, H., and Liu, Y. 2007. Discrete surfaces in isotropic geometry. In Mathematics of Surfaces XII, M. Sabin and J. Winkler, Eds. Springer, 341--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pottmann, H., Liu, Y., Wallner, J., Bobenko, A., and Wang, W. 2007. Geometry of multi-layer freeform structures for architecture. ACM Trans. Graphics 26, 3, #65,1--11. Proc. SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schiftner, A., and Balzer, J. 2010. Statics-sensitive layout of planar quadrilateral meshes. In Advances in Architectural Geometry 2010, C. Ceccato et al., Eds. Springer, Vienna, 221--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schiftner, A. 2007. Planar quad meshes from relative principal curvature lines. Master's thesis, TU Wien. http://dmg.tuwien.ac.at/aschiftner/doc/diplomarbeit.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorkine, O., Cohen-Or, D., and Toledo, S. 2003. High-pass quantization for mesh encoding. In Symposium Geometry processing, L. Kobbelt, P. Schröder, and H. Hoppe, Eds. Eurographics Assoc., 42--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Van Mele, T., and Block, P. 2011. A novel form finding method for fabric formwork for concrete shells. J. Int. Assoc. Shell and Spatial Structures 52, 217--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wächter, A., and Biegler, L. T. 2006. On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Progr. 106, 25--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wardetzky, M., Mathur, S., Kälberer, F., and Grinspun, E. 2007. Discrete Laplace operators: No free lunch. In Symposium on Geometry Processing, A. Belyaev and M. Garland, Eds. Eurographics Assoc., 33--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2009. Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM Trans. Graphics 28, 5, #112,1--9. Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design of self-supporting surfaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 31, Issue 4
        July 2012
        935 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/2185520
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 2012
        Published in tog Volume 31, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader