How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas?

ABSTRACT

Personas are a critical method for orienting design and development teams to user experience. Prior work has noted challenges in justifying them to developers. In contrast, it has been assumed that designers and user experience professionals - whose goal is to focus designs on targeted users - will readily exploit personas. This paper examines that assumption. We present the first study of how experienced user-centered design (UCD) practitioners with prior experience deploying personas, use and perceive personas in industrial software design. We identify limits to the persona approach in the context studied. Practitioners used personas almost exclusively for communication, but not for design. Participants identified four problems with personas, finding them abstract, impersonal, misleading and distracting. Our findings argue for a new approach to persona deployment and construction. Personas cannot replace immersion in actual user data. And rather than focusing on creating engaging personas, it is critical to avoid persona attributes that mislead or distract.

References

1. Blomquist, A., Arvola, M. (2002). Personas in action: Ethnography in an interaction design team. Proc. of NordiCHI. 197--200.
2. Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design: Setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with computers, 13(1), 61--75.
3. Chang, Y., Lim, Y., Stolterman, E. Personas: From theory to practices. Proceedings of NordiCHI. 439--442.
4. Chapman, C. N., Milham, R. (2006). The personas' new clothes: Methodological and practical arguments against a popular method. Proc. of HFES. 634--636.
5. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Sams Publishers.
6. Cooper, A., Reimann, R. (2003). About face 2.0: The essentials of interaction design. Wiley Publishing.
7. Goodwin, K., Cooper, A. (2009). Designing for the digital age: How to create human-centered products and services. Wiley Publishing.
8. DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., and Muller, M. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. In Proc. CSCW 2008. ACM Press.
9. Dotan, A., Maiden, N., Lichtner, V., Germanovich, L. (2009). Designing with only four people in mind?: A case study of using personas to redesign a workintegrated learning support system. Proceedings of INTERACT. 497--509.
10. Ehrlich, K., Shami, N. S. (2010). Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. Proc. of ICWSM.
11. Faily, S., Flechais, I. (2011). Persona cases: A technique for grounding personas. Proc. of CHI. 2267--2270.
12. Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92--105.
13. Grudin, J. (2006). Why personas work: The psychological evidence. In J. Pruitt and T. Adlin (eds.) The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout the product design, 642--664. Morgan Kaufman.
14. Grudin, J., Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. Proc. of the Participatory Design Conference. 144--161.
15. Judge, T., Matthews, T., Whittaker, S. (2012). Comparing collaboration and individual personas for the design and evaluation of collaboration software. Proc. of CHI.
16. Long, F (2009). Real or Imaginary; The effectiveness of using personas in product design. Proc. of the Irish Ergonomics Society Annual Conference. 1--10.
17. Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S., Judge, T. (2012). Productive Interrelationships Between Collaborative Groups Ease the Challenges of Dynamic and Multi-Teaming. Computer Supported Co-operative Work, doi=10.1007/s10606-011-9154-y.
18. Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S. (2011). Collaboration personas: A new approach to designing workplace collaboration tools. Proc. of CHI. 2247--2256.
19. McGinn, J., Kotamraju, N. Data-driven persona development. Proceedings of CHI. 1521--1524.
20. Nielsen, L. (2004). Engaging Personas and Narrative Scenarios. Copenhagen, Samfundslitteratur. Ph.D. Dissertation.
21. Pruitt, J., Adlin, T. (2006). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout the product design. Morgan Kaufman.
22. Pruitt, J., Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and theory. Proceedings of DUX.
23. Rönkkö, K. (2005). An empirical study demonstrating how different design constraints, project organization, and contexts limited the utility of personas. Proc. of HICSS.
24. Rönkkö, K., Hellman, M., Kilander, B., Dittrich, Y. (2004). Personas is not applicable: local remedies interpreted in a wider context. Proc. of Participatory Design Conference. 112--120.
25. Sinha, R. (2003). Persona development for information-rich domains. Proceedings of CHI. 830--831.
26. Skeels, M. M., Grudin, J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. Proc. of GROUP. 95--104.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing