An investigation of player to player character identification via personal pronouns

ABSTRACT

The player character is an important feature of many games, where it is through the character that the player interacts with game world. There has been considerable interest in the relationship between the player and the player character. Much of this work has examined the identification of players with their characters, generally taking either a textual analysis approach, or has been empirical work that has explicitly identified the idea of identification through survey instruments, etc. The work presented here takes a different empirical approach, focusing on the use of various pronoun forms (first, second, third) as an indication of the relationship between player and character. Results indicate that the presence of story and information about the player character had no effect on identification with the plater character. However, characteristics of the players, particularly gender and general experience in playing video games, did have a statistically significant affect, indicating that different levels of identification are more dependent on the player than on the game. This indicates that players are not a homogeneous group with respect to player character identification and is an important consideration for designers to recognise.

References

1. 1up.com. 2007. Linked-in: Meet the Man behind Zelda, http://www.1up.com/features/zelda-interview, accessed 23^rd March 2012.
2. Bettelheim, B. 1976. The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. New York: Knopf.
3. Cline, R., & Cline, T. 1980. A structural analysis of risky-shift and cautious-shift discussions: the diffusion-of-responsibility theory. Communication Quarterly, 28, 4 (Fall 1980), 26--36.
4. Conrad, D. C., & Conrad, R. 1956. The use of personal pronouns as categories for studying small group interaction. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 2(Mar. 1956), 277--279.
5. Chris Crawford. 2003. Chris Crawford on Game Design. New Riders Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
6. De Mul, J. 2006. The Game of Life: Narrative and Ludic Identity Formation in Computer Games, in Handbook of Computer Game Studies, (J. Raessens & J. Goldstein, eds.), MIT Press Cambridge, 251--266.
7. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. 2004. Human-Computer Interaction, 3^rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Harlow.
8. Eladhari, M. 2007. The Player's Journey, in The Players' Realm, (J. Williams & J. Smith eds.), McFarland, London. 171--187.
9. Filiciak, M. 2003. Hyperidientities, in The Video Game Theory Reader (J. Wolf & B. Perron eds.), Routledge, New York, 87--102.
10. Huesmann, L. R. & Miller, L. S. 1994. Long-term effects of repeated exposure to media violence in childhood, in. Aggressive Behavior: Current Perspectives (L. R. Huesmann ed.), 153--188, New York: Plenum Press.
11. Kennedy, H. W. 2002. Lara Croft: Feminist icon or cyberbimbo?, Game studies, 2:2, http://gamestudies.org/0202/kennedy/, accessed 29 Feb 2012.
12. Malamuth N. 1986. Repeated Exposure to Violent and Nonviolent Pornography: Likelihood of Raping Ratings and Laboratory Aggression Against Women. Aggressive Behavior {serial online}. April 1986; 12, 2 (Mar. 1986), 129--137. Available from: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Ipswich, MA. Accessed March 13, 2012.
13. Mallon, B. & Webb, B. 2005. Stand up and take your place: Identifying narrative elements in narrative adventure and role-play games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 1 (January 2005), 6--6. DOI=10.1145/1057270.1057285 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1057270.1057285.
14. Mulac A., Bradac, J. & Gibbons, P. 2001. Empirical Support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Hum. Commun. Res. 27, 1 (Jan. 2001), 121--152.
15. Murphy, S. 2004. 'Live in your world, Play in Ours': The Spaces of Video Game Identity, Journal of Visual Culture, 3, 2 (Aug. 2004), 223--238.
16. Newman, J. 2002. The Myth of the Ergodic Videogame. Game Studies, 2, 1 (Jul. 2002), http://gamestudies.org/0102/newman/accessed 29th February 2012.
17. News Limited. 2012. http://www.news.com.au/technology/gaming/crash-test-games-in-review/story-e6frfrt9-1226299336820, accessed 20th March 2012.
18. Pennebaker, J. & King, L. 1999. Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 77, 6 (Dec. 1999), 1296--312.
19. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 1 (Jan. 2003), 547--577.
20. Pinchbeck, D. 2007. I remember Erebus: memory, story and immersion in first person shooters, in Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Conference on Games Research and development (CyberGames '07), pp.121--129, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK, September 2007.
21. Raskin, R., & Shaw, R. 1988. Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. Journal of Personality, 56, 2 (Jun. 1988), 393--404.
22. Redman, C. & Fawns, R. 2010. How to use pronoun grammar analysis as a methodological tools for understanding the dynamic lived space of people, in Using Analytical Frameworks for Classroom Research (S,. Rodrigues, ed.), Routledge, New York, p. 163--182.
23. Rees, A. 1983. Pronouns of Person and Power: A Study of Personal Pronouns in Public Discourse, Unpublished MA dissertation, Sheffield University.
24. Rehak, B. 2003. Playing at Being, in The Video Game Theory Reader (J. Wolf & B. Perron eds.), Routledge, New York, 103--127.
25. Rouse, R. 2005. Game Design: Theory and Practice, 2^nd ed., Wordware Publishing, Salisbury.
26. Schneider, E. F., Lang, A., Shin, M., & Bradley, S. D. 2004. Death with a story: How story impacts emotional, motivational, and physiological responses to first-person shooter video games. Human Communication Research, 30, 3 (Jul. 2004), 361--375.
27. Shaw, A. 2011. "He could be a bunny rabbit for all I care": Exploring identification in digital games. Proceedings from DiGRA 2011: Think Design Play: The fifth international conference of the Digital Research Association (DIGRA). Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/dl/display_html?chid=11313.28005.pdf, accessed 29th February 2012.
28. Tronstadt, R. 2008. Character Identification in World of Warcraft: The Relationship between Capacity and Appearance, in Digital culture, Play and identity, (H. Cornekiussen & J. Rettberg, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, 249--264.
29. Tulloch, R. 2010. 'A man chooses, a slave obeys': agency, interactivity and freedom in video gaming, Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 2, 1 (Jan. 2010), 27--38.
30. Turkle, S. 1994. Constructions and reconstructions of self in virtual reality: playing in the MUDs, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 3 (Summer 1994), 158--167.
31. Tychsen, A., Hitchens, M. & Brolund, T. 2008. Character Play -- The use of game characters in multi-player Role Playing Games across platforms. Comput. Entertain. 6, (July 2008), 24 pages. DOI=10.1145/1371216.1371225 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1371216.1371225.
32. Weintraub, W. 1981. Verbal Behaviour, Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Winer, L., The qualified pronoun count as a measure of change in family psychotherapy. Family Process, 1971, 10:2, 243--247, (1971).
34. Yates, S. & Hiles, D. 2010. 'You can't but 'I do': Rules, ethics and the significance of shifts in pronominal forms for self-positioning in talk. Discourse Studies, 12, 4 (Aug. 2010), 535--551.

Index Terms

• Software and its engineering