skip to main content
10.1145/2371574.2371612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Text entry on smartphones is far slower and more error-prone than on traditional desktop keyboards, despite sophisticated detection and auto-correct algorithms. To strengthen the empirical and modeling foundation of smartphone text input improvements, we explore touch behavior on soft QWERTY keyboards when used with two thumbs, an index finger, and one thumb. We collected text entry data from 32 participants in a lab study and describe touch accuracy and precision for different keys. We found that distinct patterns exist for input among the three hand postures, suggesting that keyboards should adapt to different postures. We also discovered that participants' touch precision was relatively high given typical key dimensions, but there were pronounced and consistent touch offsets that can be leveraged by keyboard algorithms to correct errors. We identify patterns in our empirical findings and discuss implications for design and improvements of soft keyboards.

References

  1. Bao, P., Pierce, P., Whittaker, S., and Zhai, S. (2011). Smart phone use by non-mobile business users. Proc. MobileHCI '11, 445--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Clarkson, E., Lyons, K., Clawson, J., and Starner, T. (2007). Revisiting and validating a model of two-thumb text entry. Proc. CHI '07, 163--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clawson, J., Lyons, K., Rudnick, A., Iannucci, Jr., R., and Starner, T. (2008). Automatic whiteout++: correcting mini-QWERTY typing errors using keypress timing. Proc. CHI '08, 573--582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J. O., and Wigdor, D. (2011). Typing on flat glass: examining ten-finger expert typing patterns on touch surfaces. Proc. CHI '11, 2453--2462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gong, J., Tarasewich, P., and MacKenzie, I. S. (2008). Improved word list ordering for text entry on ambiguous keypads. Proc. NordiCHI '08, 152--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goodman, J., Venolia, G., Steury, K., Parker, C. 2002. Language modeling for soft keyboards. Proc. IUI '02, 194--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gunawardana, A., Paek, T., and Meek, C. (2010). Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards. Proc. IUI '10, 111--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Henze, N., Rukzio, E., and Boll, S. (2011). 100,000,000 taps: analysis and improvement of touch performance in the large. Proc. MobileHCI '11, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Himberg, J., Häkkilä, J., Kangas, P., and Mäntyjärvi, J. (2003). On-line personalization of a touch screen based keyboard. Proc. IUI '03, 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S., & Johnston, J. (2008). Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. Proc. of CHI '08, 1573--1582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Holz, C. and Baudisch, P. (2010). The Generalized Per-ceived Input Point Model and How to Double Touch Accuracy by Extracting Fingerprints. Proc. CHI '10, 581--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Holz, C. and Baudisch, P. (2011). Understanding Touch. Proc. CHI '11, 2501--2510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kristensson, P.-O., Zhai, S. (2005). Relaxing Stylus Typing Precision by Geometric Pattern Matching. Proc. IUI '05, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kristensson, P. O. and Zhai, S. (2004). SHARK2: A Large Vocabulary Shorthand Writing System for Pen-based Computers. Proc. UIST '04, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kristensson, P. O., and Vertanen, K. (2012). Performance comparisons of phrase sets and presentation styles for text entry evaluations. Proc. IUI '12, 29--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lee, S., Zhai, S. (2009). The performance of touch screen soft buttons. Proc. CHI '09, 309--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. (2003). Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques. Proc. EACHI '03. 754--755 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. (2002). A Model of Two-Thumb Text Entry. Proc. GI '02, 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, S. X. (1999) The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. Proc. CHI '99, 25--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Paek, T., and Hsu, B.-J. P. (2011). Sampling representative phrase sets for text entry experiments: a procedure and public resource. Proc. CHI '11, 2477--2480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rudchenko, D., Paek, T., and Badger, E. (2011). Text Text Revolution: A game that improves text entry on mobile touchscreen keyboards. Proc. Pervasive '11, 206--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kumiko Tanaka-ishii. (2007). Word-based predictive text entry using adaptive language models. Nat. Lang. Eng. 13, 1 51--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wang, F. and Ren, X. (2009). Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. Proc. CHI '09, 1063--1072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wobbrock, J. O., and Myers, B. A. (2006). Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM TOCHI 13 (4), pp. 458--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Aung, H. H. (2008) The performance of hand postures in front- and back-of-device interaction for mobile computing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66, 12, 857--875. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yamada, H. (1980). A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: from the position of planning Japanese parallels. Journal of Information Processing, 1980. 2(4): 175--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhai, S. and Kristensson, P.-O. (2003). Shorthand Writing on Stylus Keyboard. Proc. CHI '03, 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Zhai, S. and Kristensson, P. O. (2006). Introduction to Shape Writing. IBM Research Report RJ10393 (also as Chapter 7 of I. S. MacKenzie and K. Tanaka-Ishii (eds), Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 139--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Touch behavior with different postures on soft smartphone keyboards

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '12: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2012
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450311052
      DOI:10.1145/2371574

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader