research-article

Distributed state estimation in sensor networks with randomly occurring nonlinearities subject to time delays

Published:30 November 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article is concerned with a new distributed state estimation problem for a class of dynamical systems in sensor networks. The target plant is described by a set of differential equations disturbed by a Brownian motion and randomly occurring nonlinearities (RONs) subject to time delays. The RONs are investigated here to reflect network-induced randomly occurring regulation of the delayed states on the current ones. Through available measurement output transmitted from the sensors, a distributed state estimator is designed to estimate the states of the target system, where each sensor can communicate with the neighboring sensors according to the given topology by means of a directed graph. The state estimation is carried out in a distributed way and is therefore applicable to online application. By resorting to the Lyapunov functional combined with stochastic analysis techniques, several delay-dependent criteria are established that not only ensure the estimation error to be globally asymptotically stable in the mean square, but also guarantee the existence of the desired estimator gains that can then be explicitly expressed when certain matrix inequalities are solved. A numerical example is given to verify the designed distributed state estimators.

References

  1. Bekmezci, I. and Alagöz, F. 2009. Energy efficient, delay sensitive, fault tolerant wireless sensor network for military monitoring. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 5, 6, 729--747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Boyd, S., Ghaoui, L. E., Feron, E., and Balakrishnan, V. 1994. Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, R., Ramanathan, P., and Sayeed, A. 2003. Distributed target classification and tracking in sensor networks. Proc. IEEE 91, 8, 1163--1171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cao, J., Chen, G., and Li, P. 2008. Global synchronization in an array of delayed neural networks with hybrid coupling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 38, 2, 488--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cattivelli, F. S., Lopes, C. G., and Sayed, A. H. 2008. Diffusion strategies for distributed kalman filtering: Formulation and performance analysis. In Proceedings of the IAPR Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing. 36--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cattivelli, F. S. and Sayed, A. H. 2008. Diffusion mechanisms for fixed-point distributed kalman smoothing. In European Signal Processing Conference. EUSIPCO. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cattivelli, F. S. and Sayed, A. H. 2009. Diffusion distributed kalman filtering with adaptive weights. In Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 908--9123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cattivelli, F. S. and Sayed, A. H. 2010a. Diffusion LMS strategies for distributed estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 58, 3, 1035--1048. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cattivelli, F. S. and Sayed, A. H. 2010b. Diffusion strategies for distributed Kalman filtering and smoothing. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55, 9, 2069--2084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cohen, R. and Kapchits, B. 2009. An optimal wake-up scheduling algorithm for minimizing energy consumption while limiting maximum delay in a mesh sensor network. IEEE ACM Trans. Networking 17, 2, 570--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Egea-Lopez, E., Vales-Alonso, J., Martinez-Sala, A., Pavon-Marino, P., and Garcia-Haro, J. 2006. Simulation scalability issues in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44, 7, 64--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gao, H. and Chen, T. 2007. H&infty; estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 52, 11, 2070--2084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gao, H., Wu, J., and Shi, P. 2009. Robust sampled-data H&infty; control with stochastic sampling. Automatica 45, 7, 1729--1736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Goodall, D. P. and Postoyan, R. 2010. Output feedback stabilisation for uncertain nonlinear time-delay systems subject to input constraints. Int. J. Control 83, 4, 676--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Karimi, H. R. and Gao, H. 2010. New delay-dependent exponential H&infty; synchronization for uncertain neural networks with mixed time delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 40, 1, 173--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kim, J. H., West, M., Scholte, E., and Narayanan, S. 2008. Multiscale consensus for decentralized estimation and its application to building systems. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. 888--893.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin, C., Wang, Z., and Yang, F. 2009. Observer-based networked control for continuous-time systems with random sensor delays. Automatica 45, 2, 578--584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Liu, H., Sun, F., He, K., and Sun, Z. 2004. Design of reduced-order H&infty; filter for Markovian jumping systems with time delay. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Express Briefs 51, 11, 607--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, J., and Liu, X. 2008. Synchronization and state estimation for discrete-time complex networks with distributed delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 38, 5, 1314--1325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lu, J. Q. and Ho, D. W. C. 2010. Globally exponential synchronization and synchronizability for general dynamical networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 40, 2, 350--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lu, J. Q., Ho, D. W. C., and Wu, L. 2009. Exponential stabilization of switched stochastic dynamical networks. Nonlinearity 22, 4, 889--911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mao, X. 1997. Stochastic Differential Equations and Their Applications. Horwood, Chichester.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mao, X., Koroleva, N., and Rodkina, A. 1998. Robust stability of uncertain stochastic differential delay equations. Syst. Control Lett. 35, 5, 325--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Meng, X., Lam, J., and Gao, H. 2009. Network-based H&infty; control for stochastic systems. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 19, 3, 295--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mou, S., Gao, H., Qiang, W., and Chen, K. 2008. New delay-dependent exponential stability for neural networks with time delay. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 38, 2, 571--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mou, S., Gao, H., Zhao, Y., and Qiang, W. 2008. Further improvement on synchronization stability of complex networks with coupling delays. Int. J. Comput. Math. 85, 8, 1255--1263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Naghshtabrizi, P. and Hespanha, J. P. 2005. Designing an observer-based controller for a network control system. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference. 848--853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Olfati-Saber, R. 2007. Distributed kalman filtering for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 1814--1820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Olfati-Saber, R. and Shamma, J. S. 2005. Consensus filters for sensor networks and distributed sensor fusion. In Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference. 6698--6703.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Schuss, Z. 1980. Theory and Applications of Stochastic Differential Equations. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen, B., Wang, Z., Hung, Y. S., and Chesi, G. 2011. Distributed H&infty; filtering for polynomial nonlinear stochastic systems in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58, 5, 1971--1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Shi, P., Mahmoud, M., Nguang, S., and Ismail, A. 2006. Robust filtering for jumping systems with mode-dependent delays. Signal Process. 86, 1, 140--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sinopoli, B., Sharp, C., Schenato, L., Schaffert, S., and Sastry, S. S. 2003. Distributed control applications within sensor networks. Proc. IEEE 91, 8, 1235--1246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Song, Q. and Cao, J. 2007. Impulsive effects on stability of fuzzy Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybernet. 37, 3, 733--741. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Speranzon, A., Fischione, C., Johansson, K. H., and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. 2008. A distributed minimum variance estimator for sensor networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 26, 4, 609--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wang, X., Wang, S., and Bi, D. 2009. Distributed visual-target-surveillance system in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 39, 5, 1134--1146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., and Liang, J. 2008. A delay fractioning approach to global synchronization of delayed complex networks with stochastic disturbances. Phys. Lett. A 372, 39, 6066--6073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., and Liang, J. 2009. Global synchronization for delayed complex networks with randomly occurring nonlinearities and multiple stochastic disturbances. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wang, Z., Wang, Y., and Liu, Y. 2010. Global synchronization for discrete-time stochastic complex networks with randomly occurred nonlinearities and mixed time delays. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 21, 1, 11--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Wu, L., Shi, P., Gao, H., and Wang, C. 2008. H&infty; filtering for 2D Markovian jump systems. Automatica 44, 7, 1849--1858. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Xiong, J. and Lam, J. 2006. Fixed-order robust H&infty; filter design for Markovian jump systems with uncertain switching probabilities. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54, 4, 1421--1430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Xiong, Z., Liveris, A. D., and Cheng, S. 2004. Distributed source coding for sensor networks. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 21, 5, 80--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yu, W., Chen, G., Wang, Z., and Yang, W. 2009. Distributed consensus filtering in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 39, 6, 1568--1577. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yuan, K., Cao, J., and Li, H. X. 2006. Robust stability of switched Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with mixed time-varying delays. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 36, 6, 1356--1363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yue, D., Han, Q., and Peng, C. 2004. State feedback controller design of networked control systems. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Express Briefs 51, 11, 640--644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Yue, D., Tian, E., Wang, Z., and Lam, J. 2009. Stabilization of systems with probabilistic interval input delays and its applications to networked control systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 39, 4, 939--945. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Zečević, A. I. and Šiljak, D. D. 2004. Design of robust static output feedback for large-scale systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 49, 11, 2040--2044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Zhang, H., Feng, G., Duan, G., and Lu, X. 2006. H&infty; filtering for multiple-time-delay measurements. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54, 5, 1681--1688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Distributed state estimation in sensor networks with randomly occurring nonlinearities subject to time delays

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader
                About Cookies On This Site

                We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

                Learn more

                Got it!