skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441781acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Closure vs. structural holes: how social network information and culture affect choice of collaborators

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Collaboration is important to successful organizations and how coworkers are selected is crucial to the dynamics of effective collaborations. In this study we explore how people use social network information, which is increasingly accessible on enterprise systems in organizations, to choose people with whom to collaborate. We conducted a scenario-based study of 459 respondents in a global high-tech company. Our data indicate cultural differences in how social network information was valued when choosing a collaborator. The Chinese, consistent with the cultural value of Guanxi, more closely followed a closure model, whereas Americans favored neither a closure nor a structural holes model. These results provide new insights into how needs for social network information may vary between cultures and how social networking sites might support workers in choosing collaborators from within and across national cultures.

References

[1]
Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27, 1 (2002), 17--40.
[2]
Alston, J. P. Wa, Guanxi, and Inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea. Business Horizons 32, 2 (1989), 26--31.
[3]
Balakrishnan, A. D., Fussell, S. R. and Kiesler, S. Do visualization improve synchronous remote collaboration? In Proc. of CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1227--1236.
[4]
Bian, Y. J. Bring strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Research 62, 3 (1997), 366--385.
[5]
Burt, R. S. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. Pp 31--56 in Social Capital: Theory and Research (edited by Lin, N., Cook, K. S. and Burt, R. S.), Aldine Press, Chicago, US, 2001.
[6]
Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M. and Michaud, C. The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science 11, 1 (2000), 123--147.
[7]
Chai, S. K. and Rhee, M. Confusion capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review 6, 1 (2009), 5--29.
[8]
Chandler, A. D., Jr. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in The History of The American Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1962/199
[9]
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., and Sloan, L. R. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 3 (1976), 366--375.
[10]
Coleman, J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociological Review 64, 1 (1988), 682--686.
[11]
Coleman, J. S. Foundation of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
[12]
Diamant, E. I., Fussell, S. R., and Lo, F. Where did we turn wrong? Unpacking the effects of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. In Proc. of CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 383--391.
[13]
Dunning, J. H. and Kim, C. The cultural roots of Guanxi: An exploratory study. The Word Economy 30, 2 (2007), 329--341.
[14]
Fisher, D. and Dourish, P. Social and temporal structures in everyday collaboration. In Proc. of CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 551--558.
[15]
Gelfand, M., Erez, M., and Aycan, Z. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58 (2007), 479--514.
[16]
Hinds, P. J., Carley, K. M., Krackhardt, D., and Wholey, D. Choosing group members: Balancing similarity, competence and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 2 (2000), 226--251.
[17]
Hinds, P. J., Liu, L., and Lyon, J. Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the process of cross-national collaboration. Academy of Management Annals. 5 (2012), 1--54.
[18]
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. E. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. In Proc. of CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1311--1320.
[19]
Kautz, H., Selman, B. and Shah, M. Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the ACM 40, 3 (1997), 63--65.
[20]
Keegan, B., Gergle, D. and Contractor, N. Do editors or articles drive collaboration? Multilevel statistical network analysis of Wikipedia coauthorship. In Proc. of CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 427--436.
[21]
Lampe, C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. A familiar Facebook: Profile elements as signals in an online social network. In Proc. of CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 435--444.
[22]
Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S. and Rybski, P. Gracefully Mitigating Breakdowns in Robotic Services. In Proc. of HRI 2010, 203--210.
[23]
Lim, B. Y., Dey, A. K. Assessing demand for intelligibility in context-aware applications. In Proc. Of the 11th internal conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM Press (2009), 195--204.
[24]
Luo, J. D. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familiar ties in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organization Review 7, 2 (2011), 329--351.
[25]
Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S., and Judge, T. Productive interrelationships between collaborative groups ease the challenges of dynamic and multi-teaming. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2012, doi=10.1007/s10606-011-9154-y.
[26]
McDonald, D. W. Recommending collaboration with social networks: A comparative evaluation. In Proc. of CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 593--600.
[27]
Morris, M. W., Podolny, J. and Sullivan, B. N. Patterns of coworker relations: Interpersonal patterns in American, Chinese, German, and Spanish divisions of a global retail bank. Organizational Science 19, 4 (2008), 517--532.
[28]
Mortensen, M., From teams to recombinant collaboration: Understanding the evolution of organizational work (January 6, 2012). INSEAD Working Paper No. 2012/02/OB. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1980698
[29]
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 11, 1-2 (2002), 205--242.
[30]
Nisbett, R. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently & and Why. New York: Free Press, 2003.
[31]
Nisbett, R. E., and Masuda, T. Culture and point of view. PNAS, 100, 19 (2003), 11163--11170.
[32]
Okhuysen, G. A., and Bechky, B. A. Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3 (2009), 463--502.
[33]
Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2000), 139--178.
[34]
Ordonez de Pablos, P. Western and eastern views on social networks, Learning Organization 12, 5 (2005), 436--456.
[35]
Setlock, L. D., and Fussell, L. R. What's it worth to you? The costs and affordances of CMC tools to Asian and American users. In Proc. of CSCW 2010, ACM Press (2010), 341--349.
[36]
Setlock, L. D., and Fussell, L. R. Culture or fluency? Unpacking interaction between culture and communication medium. In Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1137--1140.
[37]
Tang, J. C., Zhao, C., Cao, X. and Inkpen, K. Your time zone or mine? A study of globally time zone-shifted collaboration. In Proc. of CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 235--244.
[38]
Tong, S. T., Heide, B. V. D., Langwell, L., and Walther, J. B. Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impression on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 1 (2008), 531--549.
[39]
Utz, S. Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15, 2 (2010), 314--335.
[40]
Xiao, Z. X. and Tsui, A. S. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 52, 1 (2007), 1--31.
[41]
Yuan, Y. C., Carboni, I. and Enrlich, K. The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise retrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 4 (2010), 700--714.
[42]
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., and Takemura, K. Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group- based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, 1 (2005), 48--62.
[43]
Zhao, C., Hinds, P. J., and Gao, G. How and to whom people share: the role of culture in self--disclosure in online communities. In Proc. Of CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 67--76.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Structural Hole Theory in Social Network Analysis: A ReviewIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2021.30703219:3(724-739)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2022)Teammate invitation networks: The roles of recommender systems and prior collaboration in team assemblySocial Networks10.1016/j.socnet.2021.04.00868(84-96)Online publication date: Jan-2022
  • (2021)Understanding the User Interactions on GitHub: A Social Network Perspective2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD49262.2021.9437744(1148-1153)Online publication date: 5-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Closure vs. structural holes: how social network information and culture affect choice of collaborators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
    February 2013
    1594 pages
    ISBN:9781450313315
    DOI:10.1145/2441776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. closure
    2. guanxi
    3. national culture
    4. social network sites (sns)
    5. structural holes
    6. willingness to collaborate

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '13
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 23 - 27, 2013
    Texas, San Antonio, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Structural Hole Theory in Social Network Analysis: A ReviewIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2021.30703219:3(724-739)Online publication date: Jun-2022
    • (2022)Teammate invitation networks: The roles of recommender systems and prior collaboration in team assemblySocial Networks10.1016/j.socnet.2021.04.00868(84-96)Online publication date: Jan-2022
    • (2021)Understanding the User Interactions on GitHub: A Social Network Perspective2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD49262.2021.9437744(1148-1153)Online publication date: 5-May-2021
    • (2019)A Research Literature Study of Enterprise SocialMedia Platforms in OrganizationsBeta10.18261/issn.1504-3134-2019-01-0633:1(84-112)Online publication date: 7-May-2019
    • (2019)Who Would You Like to Work With?Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300889(1-15)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2017)Does Collectivism Inhibit Individual Creativity?Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998261(2344-2358)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
    • (2016)Exploring Trust and Cooperation Development with Agent-Based Simulation in A Pseudo Scale-free NetworkProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/2957276.2957305(121-130)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2016
    • (2016)Embeddedness and sequentiality in social mediaProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2820008(1052-1064)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
    • (2016)Culture and HCIUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-015-0445-915:4(629-642)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016
    • (2015)Connect Me! Antecedents and Impact of Social Connectedness in Enterprise Social SoftwareBusiness & Information Systems Engineering10.1007/s12599-015-0379-z57:3(181-196)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media