column

POPL'12 program chair's report: (or, how to run a medium-sized conference)

First page image

References

  1. Alex Aiken. Advice for program chairs. SIGPLAN Not., 46(4):19--25, April 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kathleen Fisher. In support of (quasi-)randomness in the order of considering conference submissions at program committee meetings. SIGPLAN Not., 46(4):17, April 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Hicks. POPL'12 materials. http://www.cs.umd.edu/~mwh/popl12-materials.html, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kathryn S. McKinley. Improving publication quality by reducing bias with double-blind reviewing and author response. SIGPLAN Not., 43(8):5--9, September 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mooly Sagiv. POPL'11 program chair report. SIGPLAN Not., 47(4), April 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard Snodgrass. Single- versus double-blind reviewing: an analysis of the literature. SIGMOD Rec., 35(3):8--21, September 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rhea E. Steinpreis, Katie A. Anders, and Dawn Ritzke. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national emprical study. Sex Roles, 41(718), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. POPL'12 program chair's report

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader
    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!