skip to main content
research-article

Reciprocal frame structures made easy

Published:21 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A reciprocal frame (RF) is a self-supported three-dimensional structure made up of three or more sloping rods, which form a closed circuit, namely an RF-unit. Large RF-structures built as complex grillages of one or a few similar RF-units have an intrinsic beauty derived from their inherent self-similar and highly symmetric patterns. Designing RF-structures that span over large domains is an intricate and complex task. In this paper, we present an interactive computational tool for designing RF-structures over a 3D guiding surface, focusing on the aesthetic aspect of the design.

There are three key contributions in this work. First, we draw an analogy between RF-structures and plane tiling with regular polygons, and develop a computational scheme to generate coherent RF-tessellations from simple grammar rules. Second, we employ a conformal mapping to lift the 2D tessellation over a 3D guiding surface, allowing a real-time preview and efficient exploration of wide ranges of RF design parameters. Third, we devise an optimization method to guarantee the collinearity of contact joints along each rod, while preserving the geometric properties of the RF-structure. Our tool not only supports the design of wide variety of RF pattern classes and their variations, but also allows preview and refinement through interactive controls.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp179.mp4

References

  1. Baverel, O., Nooshin, H., and Kuroiwa, Y. 2004. Configuration processing of nexorades using genetic algorithms. Jour. of the Intl. Assoc. for Shell and Spatial Structures 45, 2, 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertin, V. 2001. Variations of lever beam structures. In Proceedings of Conference on Growth and Form: The Engineering of Nature, School of Architecture, University of Waterloo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brocato, M., and Mondardini, L. 2010. Geometric methods and computational mechanics for the design of stone domes based on Abeille's bond. In Advances in Architectural Geometry, Springer, 149--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chilton, J. 1995. History of timber structures, Lecture E1. In STEP 2, Timber Engineering. STEP 2, Timber Engineering 2, E1--E13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilton, J. 2009. Development of timber reciprocal frame structures in the UK. In Proceedings of IASS Symposium 2009: Evolution and trends in design, analysis and construction of shell and spatial structures, 1877--1884.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Douthe, C., and Baverel, O. 2009. Design of nexorades or reciprocal frame systems with the dynamic relaxation method. Computers & Structures 87, 21 (Nov.), 1296--1307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Eigensatz, M., Kilian, M., Schiftner, A., Mitra, N., Pottmann, H., and Pauly, M. 2010. Paneling architectural freeform surfaces. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 29, 4, 45:1--45:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fu, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., He, Y., and Cohen-Or, D. 2010. K-set tileable surfaces. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 29, 4, 44:1--44:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Alken, P., Booth, M., and Rossi, F. 2009. GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual. 3rd Ed., ISBN 0954612078.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelez, S., and Saby, V. 2011. Nexorades, facing an emergency situation. Intl. Jour. of Space Structures 26, 4 (Nov.), 359--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. GRünbaum, B., and Shephard, G. C. 1986. Tilings and patterns. W. H. Freeman & Co. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Igarashi, Y., Igarashi, T., and Mitani, J. 2012. Beady: interactive beadwork design and construction. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 31, 4, 49:1--49:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kohlhammer, T., and Kotnik, T. 2010. Systemic behaviour of plane reciprocal frame structures. Structural Engineering Intl. 21, 1, 80--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Larsen, O. P. 2008. Reciprocal Frame Structures. Elsevier Science and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, X.-Y., Shen, C.-H., Huang, S.-S., Ju, T., and Hu, S.-M. 2010. Popup: automatic paper architectures from 3D models. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 29, 4, 111:1--111:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mitani, J., and Suzuki, H. 2004. Making papercraft toys from meshes using strip-based approximate unfolding. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 23, 3, 259--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mori, Y., and Igarashi, T. 2007. Plushie: an interactive design system for plush toys. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 26, 3, 45:1--45:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paczkowski, P., Kim, M. H., Morvan, Y., Dorsey, J., Rushmeier, H., and O'Sullivan, C. 2011. Insitu: sketching architectural designs in context. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH ASIA) 30, 6, 182:1--182:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Parigi, D., and Pugnale, A. 2012. Three-dimensional reciprocal structures: morphology, concepts, generative rules. In IASS-APCS Proc. from spatial structures to space structures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Parigi, D., KirkeGaard, P. H., and Sassone, M. 2012. Hybrid optimization in the design of reciprocal structures. In Proceedings of the IASS Symposium 2012: from spatial structures to spaces structures. 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pugnale, A., Parigi, D., Kirkegaard, P. H., and Sassone, M. 2011. The principle of structural reciprocity: history, properties and design issues. In IASS: Intl. Conference on Space Structures, 414--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheffer, A., Lévy, B., Mogilnitsky, M., and Bogomyakov, A. 2005. ABF++: Fast and robust angle based flattening. ACM Tran. on Graphics 24, 2 (Apr.), 311--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Singh, M., and Schaefer, S. 2010. Triangle surfaces with discrete equivalence classes. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 29, 46:1--46:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Thönnissen, U., and Werenfels, N. 2011. Reciprocal frames - teaching experiences. Intl. Jour. Of Space Structures 26, 4, 369--372. (Rhino-script developed by Prof. Annette Spiro).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Umetani, N., Igarashi, T., and Mitra, N. 2012. Guided exploration of physically valid shapes for furniture design. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 31, 4, 86:1--86:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2009. Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH ASIA) 28, 5, 112:1--112:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Whiting, E., Shin, H., Wang, R., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2012. Structural optimization of 3D masonry buildings. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH ASIA) 31, 6, 159:1--159:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Xin, S.-Q., Lai, C.-F., Fu, C.-W., Wong, T.-T., He, Y., and Cohen-Or, D. 2011. Making burr puzzles from 3D models. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 30, 4, 97:1--97:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yang, Y.-L., Yang, Y.-J., Pottmann, H., and Mitra, N. J. 2011. Shape space exploration of constrained meshes. ACM Tran. on Graphics (SIGGRAPH ASIA) 30, 6, 124:1--124:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reciprocal frame structures made easy

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
        ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 32, Issue 4
        July 2013
        1215 pages
        ISSN:0730-0301
        EISSN:1557-7368
        DOI:10.1145/2461912
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 July 2013
        Published in tog Volume 32, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader